Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

mrwayne · July 22, 2012, 10:16:26 AM

To All,
It is clear through all of our postings and answers to the questions regarding our system that we us Buoyancy In a very unique way to generate excess power - and that the system is self looped - requiring no input.
As I said before - I have allowed the skeptics and the validation teams to decide how they chose to measure the input and output.
It is elementary to understand that a system such as ours - that requires no input to produce work - "of any kind" requires proper and due dilligense before making claims of any sort.
It has also been explained in regards to comparisons to other systems - Mark Dansie - 99.9% of all claims of FE are - measurement error - poor theory, and a few scams.
Mark has also said publically and on other forums repeatedly - this Oklahoma device is the .1% we have been looking for.
It is a waste of my time to tell you how good our system is - that is why I have helped others to discover for themself.
You can get as complicated as you want - you can get even more sophisticated equipment - you can claim you see nothing - but you can not make the simple math go away.
The truth of the .1% success is right before your eyes - if you just are honerable enough to look.
As I said to MH before - I will not waste my time with the dishonerable - do your home work.
I do not expect anyone to take my word for it - and I have been open and honest.
All the claims to the contrary do not float like the Z.E.D.
P.s. I have asked nothing from any of you - I have offered to share.
I am thankful for the sucess our team has had - and the now 13 replication (modeling) successes that have been reported to me.
Wayne Travis

neptune · July 22, 2012, 10:46:36 AM

@mrwayne. Thanks for that information. Could you please make it clear for us what you mean by modelling. Are you speaking of an actual device, made from sheet metal, plastic or some other substance, or are you speaking of a "Mathematical Model", a computer simulation, or indeed something else entirely. It is important for us to know.
Respectfully Neptune.

neptune · July 22, 2012, 10:49:59 AM

To all members . I have made a big mistake , and I will now apologise. I am very sorry for feeding the Trolls. I promise it is a mistake that I will never repeat. Sorry.

mrwayne · July 22, 2012, 11:05:11 AM

Quote from: neptune on July 22, 2012, 10:46:36 AM
@mrwayne. Thanks for that information. Could you please make it clear for us what you mean by modelling. Are you speaking of an actual device, made from sheet metal, plastic or some other substance, or are you speaking of a "Mathematical Model", a computer simulation, or indeed something else entirely. It is important for us to know.
Respectfully Neptune.

Hello Neptune,
I now remember you asking this before - I am sorry for the delay - lots of interuptions.

As far as I know - Mathematical modeling - simple and complex physics.

You do not need an new form of physics to understand our process - just the ability to see that we have an anomaly in the area of physics that does an 'endaround' to belief that mechanical FE is impossible.

Wayne

MileHigh · July 22, 2012, 11:31:20 AM

QuoteYou do not need an new form of physics to understand our process - just the ability to see that we have an anomaly in the area of physics that does an 'endaround' to belief that mechanical FE is impossible.

I passed Grade 11 physics and because of that I have no desire to "learn" how the system allegedly works. They only thing that counts are results.

Neptune you should look up the definition of "troll" and educate yourself.

The only thing of interest is to see how this story will end. Will it take the form of one of the classic free energy exit strategies? I am willing to bet that it will.

MileHigh