Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[neptune]

@Webby1.Looks as if you have been busy. I like your use of a water column as an input pump. It looks like you are still at the tuning stage. There are a few questions I would like to ask, if you wish to answer them .
1. You talk about adjustments to the pod. Apart from the water level in the pod chamber, which you mention, are there any other pod adjustments that one can make?
2. Is your apparatus fitted with any air vent valves for use during the initial filling process? In an earlier post, I suggested a filling method that required no vents.The method was to clamp down the risers, and then force water into the inlet until it overflowed from the outer vessel. Then force air into the inlet until it bubbles from the outer vessel.


I am impressed that, as a result of your mathematical analysis, you were confident enough to invest time, energy and money into a build. As regards the tuning process, I would have thought that apart from the water level and stroke length, and ballast weight, there are only a limited number of adjustments you can make. So sooner or later, you will derive "rules of thumb" to enable you to do an optimum set up, whereby you will be able to virtually guarantee best performance every time. I am certain that I don`t need to tell you how important your work is, because in my opinion, once we have the first independent replication with unquestionable proof of OU, then the Genie is well and truly out of the bottle.
Should anything happen to prevent Wayne continuing with his work[heaven forbid], there will be no turning back.

[wildew]

Hi Webby1
Nice work.
Based on all of the information presented prior I would focus on only about a half inch of travel, even that might be a bit much for a system of that height. It looks like you are trying different weights, that is probably significant. Wayne even stated once that the system works better when it's working harder and I think I might be starting to understand why.

Dale

[neptune]

I just had a thought that might be useful or it might not. If we run the device through a complete cycle, we need to input water under pressure to cause the lift. Then , to lower the risers, we need to let some water out of the device, and release some pressure, but not all the pressure. Here is a low tech way to achieve this. Webbby1 is using a vertical tube full of water to inject water into the system. To extract water and pressure for the downstroke, that vertical tube, which appears to be connected to the device by a flexible pipe, simply needs to be tilted over to a predetermined angle, to reduce its head pressure. The vertical tube needs to be long enough to contain all the ejected water. Not certain how you would then measure input energy. Just a thought...

[mondrasek]

On a personal note...

I spent about 3 man hours opening the casing of a refrigerator compressor that I had to have replaced.  My goal was to find the "mechanical" lockup since all the (pre replacement) electrical tests seemed fine, except for current draw.

Found no problem.  Everything moved nicely.  So I tried to disassemble for my own learning, but also because I think little pistons and connecting rods are cool.

I was disappointed that the unit had obviously been manufactured only for assembly, and not disassembly or maintenance (Why would it not be?  Its in a sealed steel pod!).  But I did the best I could to take it apart with the tools in my garage.  And I succeeded!  But with a piston that broke its skirt when I had to punch out the piston pin after not being able to remove the roll pin that secured it.

Either way, I learned a lot.

A question:  I found no permanent magnetic properties in the stator or rotor.  Anyone know why?

I've heard from Dennis and Larry and they are both hard at work and about ready to reveal new information.

Oh, and webby has got some great updates coming.

Just thought I'd offer this info up.

M.

[Xaverius]

On a personal note...

I spent about 3 man hours opening the casing of a refrigerator compressor that I had to have replaced.  My goal was to find the "mechanical" lockup since all the (pre replacement) electrical tests seemed fine, except for current draw.

Found no problem.  Everything moved nicely.  So I tried to disassemble for my own learning, but also because I think little pistons and connecting rods are cool.

I was disappointed that the unit had obviously been manufactured only for assembly, and not disassembly or maintenance (Why would it not be?  Its in a sealed steel pod!).  But I did the best I could to take it apart with the tools in my garage.  And I succeeded!  But with a piston that broke its skirt when I had to punch out the piston pin after not being able to remove the roll pin that secured it.

Either way, I learned a lot.

A question:  I found no permanent magnetic properties in the stator or rotor.  Anyone know why?

I've heard from Dennis and Larry and they are both hard at work and about ready to reveal new information.

Oh, and webby has got some great updates coming.

Just thought I'd offer this info up.

M.

No PMs?  The stator and rotor must be field wound EMs that are powered by the main supply.