Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mondrasek]

I thought of ways to break the thing before I built it

Hmmm.  Sounds similar to TK's methodology for testing.

Well, thorough testing that is.

M.

[mrwayne]

Hello All,

And thank you for the personal e-mails - yes some people ignore the truth, attack and slander - it is poor form.

I have shared and others have confirmed with their own physics - more to come - and the replication of our massively overunity system.

When considering only one aspect of our Z.E.D technology - one portion of the process - one specific number of layers - in particular the discussion concerning the current three layered model:

The Up stroke - by itself - no transfer of energy from the other Z.E.D. - just a stand alone observation - is only better than a standard hydraulic cylinder - input to output by about 700 pounds of lift.

In this three layered model - that is only about 10% more than a hydraulic cylinder - which is not a bad thing - but not where our massive overunity comes from - just part of it (Our Baiter knows this).

Once again - our baiter has twisted out of context my statements.
Seamus101 and Seamus102 - who pays you to disinform people? - you have tipped your hand again.

To All,

To show that I have covered the topic of where our "massive input reduction comes from" - well on this thread -

Would someone else please explain how the Two Z.E.D process works to massively reduce our input costs.
This will help protect the new visitors from the intentional dis-information.
Yes, it is a shame we have to deal with this.

My appreciation in advance, many of you have proven your abilities.

Wayne Travis

[wildew]

Change in ( current ) topic:
A few weeks ago there was considerable discussion about building a square ZED.
Did anyone ever try ?
I've been a little surprised no one took up the challenge then.

I happen to have a half-sheet of .060 acrylite and have ordered a piece of .470 for the base and top riser, and another piece of .250 for the "tank".
I've done a couple of tests and both PVC cement and 2-part epoxy seem to make acceptable bonds and are more tolerant of irregularities than the solvent weld shown in the posted video links.

I've laid out  a mock up for a 4" square x 12" tall, 3 riser test using .060 air gaps for a 5.800 outer dimension. If anyone would care to provide feedback in the thread or PM please do so. One question; would it be better to use a 4" or 6" "extension" for an overall height of 16" or 24"?

At the moment I'm planning on starting from the outside and working inward, I want to see and attempt to measure changes as the layering is increased.

Thanks
Dale

[wildew]

... bad math, that would be 16" or 18" tall
Dale

[mrwayne]

Not bad Webby,

You describe the lateral transfer of the Head pressure well. And you are right the input cost would be about 1/2
(starts making that 700 on the upstroke extra). The cost seems small when we pay 1/2 for the other 7000 pounds we lift.


Now - who will explain how we take advantage of the Non - linear aspect of our Z.E.D? (how much did the weight cost to lift versus the pressure it returned)

Wayne

@ Seamus101 and 102 - to borrow a line from a good show (modified) for you.

"I don't think that word you used 'Ludicrous' means what you think it means."

Please take the time to research - or keep your unintended "condescending" comments until you do your due diligence.

Good day.