Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[wildew]

You just made me laugh out load -

You're welcome Wayne 
Dale

[wildew]

Well, does this mean then that the input must go up by the head pressure at a greater value than the increase in pressure???  I mean come on, 1 riser at 22 inches of head giving 8lb of lift and then the 3rd riser head pressure is only up to 42 inches but lift has gone up to 32lb,, and all that for the same volume of input fluid??

Great job by the way!

Thanks for the compliment Webby.
Did you mean force instead of "pressure???" - I think you're just trying to reinforce what I noted, adding layers multiplies output force and it doesn't appear to be linear to input force.

Right?

Now I need to work on getting the weights set up and cleaning up the air plumbing. And probably adding the bottom ports...

Even kind of thinking about setting up manometers on each. Would be cool to watch during stroke but couldn't; too bad.
The air and fluid flows (unless the tubing was tiny, maybe) would really mess with the system. They'd be real nice for setup though; just have to valve closed for operation.

Anyway, 'nough typing - back to the shop
Dale

[LarryC]

Attached is a calculator based on Wayne's calculation instructions to replicators from reply #2505.


Would any of the replicator please apply your specifications and see how it works out. I used made up data that would give me the same results as Wayne had in #2505.


I've been working with this calculator using data from my calculators and an interesting observation that can be made is that the ratio (not shown) of the 'SI of Pod Retainer' to the 'SI of pod retainer water gap' is the key to the OU.


Regards, Larry

[GreenHiker]

Larry! 

I've got the whiteboard in the kitchen full of the numbers from post #2505 right now!

Thanks for the extra fuel. Your efforts are sincerely appreciated.

Tom

[fletcher]

But what has all this to do with a serious technical discussion or dissection of a principle to over-unity ?
So why are you diverting Fletcher ?
You know how the zed works and achieves OU, but you avoid to engage ?
What is your agenda ?

Michel

Hello Michel,

Lets avoid diversions (of agenda debates) - this forum (fringe or not) has brought us some incredible new friendships, team members -  people that have seen the wisdom, felt the purpose and respect the benefit to mankind.

Fletcher is not the first to suggest a better idea - prior design, and or competition. We have room for competition, no worries.

We at HER would rather suggest a dialog of understanding and joining - rather than the direction of threats and theft - be they real or not; greed will naturally separate the two.

Thanks Wayne

Michel .. my agenda has been upfront from the start.

To support, where I am able, any sim builder or model builder prepared to openly & fully discuss their builds in this thread, in a respectful manner - I also said that I was without prejudice quite prepared to let chips fall where they may.

Which Wayne is also cognizant of, & prepared for, judging by his response to you.