Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Free Energy prize money

Started by PaulLowrance, April 09, 2005, 11:44:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pirate88179

Quote from: profitis on January 03, 2015, 05:06:58 AM
Its not hard to notice the discrepency for discerning individuals and definitely not hard to notice the discrepency once pointed out to someone who didn't see the discrepency by someone who did see the discrepency.your argument is flawed eg. 3000 people read the textbook up to page 5 while twenty read up to page 30.of the twenty who read up to page 30 only 6 are paying attention subtitle concentration cells.of the 6 that are paying attention to subheading concentration cells only one is reading sub-sub-title section on electrode concentration cells.of the one that is paying attention to sub-sub-title electrode concentration cells only 0.25 is paying attention to sub-sub-sub-title gas electrode concentration cells or gas reference electrodes.you're implying that the whole world must jump upndown and celebrate by doing experiments to verify a discrepency which only 26 people notice globaly/week

Wow!  I should have you talk to the IRS for me.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

profitis

Lol. sarkeizen is turning me into a auditor/lawyer/statistition @pirate.maybe there's more money in those fields than in energy

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on January 03, 2015, 05:06:58 AM
Its not hard to notice the discrepency
Then lots of people will but nobody has published in an journal in an unambiguous way.
Quote
because the global population isn't jumping upndown and celebrating that I must be wrong in my research?
Nope.  I'm saying that if something in science is novel, simple and obvious and accessible to an enormous number of people.  The expectation is that it will be published, clearly and unambiguously.  However we don't see that so it's unlikely that your ideas are correct.  The more obvious you claim things are the more unlikely your claim.  However if you lied about how obvious things are...that's cool...you can just admit that you lied again. :)

Also that you should use quotes around the word "research" when referring to the work you do.

profitis

Quote frm sarkeizen:'the expectation is that it will be published, clearly and unambiguously.'

This is your biggest mistake.this is your expectation.this is not most peoples expectation

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on January 03, 2015, 04:50:31 PM
this is not most peoples expectation
Sorry, you have no knowledge or experience with journals.  So your opinion is pretty much worthless.