A Poll on the current Rosemary Ainslie apparatus

[powercat]

In the last two years that I have followed Rosie's work to get her circuit accepted I have only seen a small number of replications done,
the most recent member on this forum was Woopy and about a year ago Gotoluc and in the early days TinselKoala. Now if they can't make this circuit do what Rosie claims then I have no chance.
The more this drags on and the more the blame game is played then it is more likely this circuit will not work or ever did to the extent that is claimed. 
(those of us who have been here long enough  have seen it all before)
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=videos&search_query=Rosemary+Ainslie+circuit&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&suggested_categories=28&page=2

I admire Rosie's determination very much but in less she comes up with some new and astonishing self running circuit then it will all fade away.

The best bit, it is all very educational and entertaining ,free energy I think not.

[poynt99]

How about:

"I am an electronics expert and what Rosie is doing appears to be very interesting."

"I am an electronics expert and I think Rosie really has it."

"I am an electronics expert but, I do not have enough information to say if Rosie's device works or not."

This poll could have been done, not that it needed to be done, with 2 simple questions.  This topic has an agenda which is plain for all to see.

Bill

1 and 3 will be added, 2 is a repeat.

Please explain Bill, what "agenda" it is that in your opinion is "plain to see".

.99

[MrMag]

I don't want to but in over on her thread but this looks like a good spot to make some comments, if you don't mind.

I really don't understand why it is taking so long to find out if her circuit is OU or not. Can't she just drain a bit off the batteries and run the circuit for a week or so. The batteries will either be charged up or drained. With the size and capacity of the batteries she is using, running it for a couple of hours or so won't prove anything. If she could run the setup continuous for a couple of weeks, there would be no need for measurements, as far as I'm concerned. If it is discovered that it is OU, then yes, you would need to take measurements to see exactly what and why it is happening.

I give Rosie credit for sticking with it but I'm not very impressed with her attitude as of late. In a way I don't blame her, I may be the same way put in her boots. But, she needs to be a little more professional in her words and actions if she want to come across as a professional.
From my point of view, I really don't think that Poynt is picking on her. I feel that he is only trying to get to the bottom of it. Rose has said all along that she has very little background in electronics yet she is arguing with someone who does.

Until an extended run of her circuit is accomplished, I really do not think it will be resolved one way or the other. Even if Poynt has solid proof, she will never agree with it.

[poynt99]

Out of 7 questions, one is positive, one is neutral, and five are negative.  This looks like a CNN poll about Busch. 

Bill

Bill, my interpretation of the selections comes out somewhat different than yours;

2 pos.
3 neg.
2 neut.

I am referring to the selections before I added the last two entries you requested.

Regards,
.99