Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Overbalancing wheel

Started by SPANG, May 10, 2011, 12:46:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Quote from: Dr on May 21, 2011, 07:03:38 AM
Hi Jerry: Mainstream Science is still using that very lame crutch to lean on: "there has never been a wheel that can turn under its own power, therefore it is safe to say there never will be!" DUH! 100 years from now ,if mankind survives, people will say about this generation, "can you believe those Idiots, and how they wasted all those natural resources!!" There are millions upon millions of combinations to use weights and gravity in a wheel, and Jerry study History and you will see where many slaves ended up being the master, because the master "got lazy"
It is safe to say that mathematics and theory in general supports this statement too. It is not only history which supports the statement. If our mathemathichs was full of errors, we would never be able to land on the moon, nor sending satelites into orbit, nor be able to build one single thing which worked as supposed. Present mathematics are pretty solid. All that we do, make, send into space are based on basic, present, known mathemathics. Why shouldn't the same mathemathics be sufficient to determine the truth about gravity wheels?
If gravity isn't what we think it is, I really think these unknown factors had already been taken care of before we sent people to the moon.

Vidar

AB Hammer

SPANG

Back in the late 1800s there was a design claim that doubled the chain on the descending side for its overbalance. I have a rough drawing of it but I will have to find it. But I thought you might want to try to look it up. It was found before in some old news papers. A member by the name of "broli" may have been the one who originally posted the links.

I will look on my end to find what information I saved.

Alan
With out a dream, there can be no vision.

Alan

Dr

Vidar: It was not math that landed the lunar module, but men, and we still dont know exactly what gravity is, what it does yes. And dont get me started on people and their theoretical what nots, because they are the same as bungholes everyone has one!!!! And guess what ? Newton played around with gravity wheels also, at least two that we know of!!!

Dr

Bill: I apologize for semi- hijacking your thread, rant over! :P

Low-Q

Without calculations they could not land on the moon, nor accurately place and control the Hubble telescope. It is all about gravity and how it affects matter. I am also sure that Newtons wheels did not run. If we base our builds on known factors about gravity, we cannot expect to succeed. We need more than gravity as we know it.
You should know better, but I honestly admire your spirit 'Dr' :)