PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[JouleSeeker]

  This is a VERY intriguing conclusion, NP:

operating the 'Tesla Switch' version of this circuit and using the same quantity of input energy would power the same load for 1335/470 = 2.84 times as long - or to put it another way, the 'Tesla Switch' arrangement would deliver 284% of the energy to the same load as that supplied by the regular SJ1 variant circuit
watch this space!
np

A significant development!   Especially considering that energy is being dissipated in the LED and in the coil.

I will "watch this space" -- and thank you for this ongoing research. --Steve

[NerzhDishual]

Hi OU Sirs,

Greeting Dr Steven E. Jones.

As far as I can figure it out, Mister Nul-Point(s), as a genuine British gentleman, you are a master of cryptic humour. RU not?

I have printed out your post and will read it. Thanks for it.
I hate to read too much long technical text on a computer screen.
A matter of age. I guess.
---------------------
Now, trying to be 'general'...

I'm watching this vid from Peter Lindemann: "Electric Motor Secrets"
In a condensed nutshell, P. Lindeman is, notably showing (demonstrating) us that a mere small DC magnet electric motor is about 75% efficient. OK.

But, shoud we get rid of this nasty Back EMF (Counter Electromotive Force) that "one efficiency" of this motor is 300%. I quote : "Conclusion : The back EMF masks the excellent performance of the motor and hides it below a very low COP".
-------------------------
My naive conclusion: coils and capacitiors are intrinsically OU...
------------------------
We, particularly, do not figure it out because of the geometry of our devices.
A guy named Eric Dollard (With a final 'd', please) is saying sometyhing like :
"Just multiply by the square root of -1" = rotate it 90°.

About this, you can consult:
"Longitudinal Waves and Transverse Waves tests".
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lmdtem.htm
You can also see that a vertical mill wind seems to be more efficient and less harmfull. 
It sounds like that, for the moment, humanity is just building devices the wrong way.

I would dare to add : just also take the time into account.
"Delayed" is about time. Is it not?
Please, for that, google "Claus Turtur".
----------------------------------------
And now, the, off topic, musical intermezzo:
Roy Rogers (slide guitar) - Walkin Blues
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW08Rc802MQ
A real US bluesman guy. Is he not?

Very Best

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Dear JouleSeeker
I wonder if you could advise us if you are one and the same person as our member who variously identifies himself as Physics Prof and Steven E Jones?  Surprisingly I'm in receipt of a personal message from B**** - who also, apparently, shares the same name.  Such an extraordinary co-incidence.  Regarding this post of yours.

There is some recent information -- .....Adding ONE proton to a Nickel nucleus as claimed by Rossi and Focardi will produce Copper isotopes, predominately Cu-59 and Cu-61, since the predominate isotopes of nickel are Ni-58 (68%) and Ni-60 (26.2%).  {Add one proton to Ni-58, becomes Cu-59; add proton to Ni-60, becomes Cu-61.) Furthermore, both of these copper isotopes are highly radioactive (releasing gammas) and easily detectable!  And detecting their presence via decay products would conclusively demonstrate the occurrence of the proton-capture reaction on Nickel.

Where exactly have either Rossi and/or Focardi claimed this?  I believe this was a claim made by a 3rd party and is entirely unsubstantiated.  Nor do I find any support of this finding - by anyone at all. Then.  I'm merely a member of that 'vulnerable' public who, thankfully, you're  anxious to 'protect'.  The copper that was found was, as I understood it, 'stable' - is that the right term?  Presumably this means that it had no 'isotopic'? - again terminology - help me out here - imbalance?  Which, again as I understand it - means that it would not, therefore emit that 'radioactive' decay.  Those 'gammas'.  Golly.  One's alarm bells start ringing.  Without any kind of schooling - even I know that 'gamma rays' are somewhat toxic if not lethal.  IF, indeed, this E-Cat was emitting Gamma Rays - then SURELY?  We should do our level best to resist any further progress of this technology?

Unless, of course, there isn't actual PROOF of this or, indeed, any toxic emission.  Poor Rossi.  Neither he nor Focardi - nor any of those academics who actually REPLICATED his E-Cat findings - were able to find any emissions at all.  Which just goes to show.  Give a sample to an independent laboratory for analysis - and God alone knows what they'll find.  One hopes that sample wasn't tampered with.  The comfort is this.  If was - then it was not by Rossi et al.  They're on record.  They can find ABSOLUTELY no toxicity in this technology AT ALL.  Possibly it was simply 'claimed' by whoever it was that's 'claiming' this.  My vote would be to get a second independent laboratory onto the job.  It could be that there's an over zealous detractor at the laboratory who's trying to discredit cold fusion.  We need to look out for such people.  They're those dedicated 'disinformants' who are trying to keep over unity evidence out of the eye of our public.  God forbid that they succeed.  We need to beware.

But there's another point to this.  If, indeed, the E-Cat is able to transmute nickle to copper and iron - and if it comes out in such copious quantities - then - frankly - why bother with using the E-cat as a generator?  I would have thought that Rossi's time would be far better spent in manufacturing copper.  HUGELY profitable.  One should alert him to this potential.  It seems that he's overlooked it.  I'm absolutely satisfied that he would make considerably more money in this way than in trying to sell those working units of his to the needy public. 

Actually, come to think of it - even our academics would know this - and they're not renowned, as a rule, for their business acumen.  Perhaps - after all - it was simply 'contaminated' - as you propose.  But then I wonder if Rossi would have contaminated it.  It rather works against his claim - and simply confuses the issue.  No.  On the whole I would suggest that the contamination was from that 'plant' at the plant.  lol.  Probably he's in the pocket of our rich oil or grid supply monopolists.  Golly.  This is all giving me a headache. 

Anyway - in conclusion - and as a rule - I think we should rather desist from alleging anything at all.  It's like any speculation.  It just goes around in circles.  The best thing to do here is to support any MEASURED EVIDENCE of over unity - in the E-cat - and leave it at that.  And, happily, that evidence is incontestable.  Being, as I am, a member of the vulnerable public - I'm glad there are those such as you to protect our best interests in all things.  Clearly we can hardly assess anything at all - for ourselves.  But actually, I for one would not care if Rossi was a Christian, a Buddhist, an ultruist - or even an outright capitalist.  Golly.  I would just love to see his technology available to us all without any further gossip mongering.  Unless - of course - there are proven FACTS against his good name. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

By the by.  This post of yours has nothing to do with your thread topic.  I notice it's been copied on yet another thread of yours.  Something to do with coins that you're offering as a prize for a perpetually running motor.  Just as an aside - I think a perpetual motor may just earn even more than the value of those coins.  But is is nonetheless, excessively generous of you to offer anything at all.   If you check out the board here you'll see that we have a member who has dedicated a thread to the promotion of the E-Cat.  You may find some answers to those 'allegations' that you're promoting.

Golly.  And I also see that it's the identical post copied at Overunity Research.com.  You've clearly been rather busy. 

Kindest again,
R
I took out B**** 's name to protect his identity.  Sorry about that.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Dear JouleSeeker,

Just another point.  Don't feel bad that Rossi didn't reply to your offer to check out that 'gamma ray' emission.  He's probably rather busy.  I imagine he's be a bit preoccupied at the moment. It's hardly likely to be that he suspects you are out to 'blacken' his good name.  The evidence shows us that you are MOST objective.

Kindest regards again
Rosemary

[NerzhDishual]

Ouch, this thread is suddenly getting cold and harsh even with some
"Dear", "Regards" and "Kindest".

When I was young, I was taught that Maths and Science were the ultimate
non questionable knowledges. Was I being lied to?
Is, for example, Georg Cantor, really right?

Very Nothing.