PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[profitis]

And here's some more http://www.whale.to/b/magneto_thermodynamics1.html second law violation in electromagnets

[synchro1]

Notice in the latching video, there's a paper spacer between the magnet and keeper. A gadolinmium keeper would yield not only fly back and Piezo power, but maximum adiabatic differential as well.

Coating one of Dr. Jone's steel blocks with a film of Piezo transducer compound like nano powder Barium Titanate in alcohol solution may generate and store enough power in a capacitor to latch and unlatch the magnetic bond. Reversing the spark polarity unlocks the bond. The steel blocks would act as the Piezo transducer electrodes. The charge rate would determine the latch frequency. Thinner plates might bond just as good. The Piezo electric layer spikes power upon release as well as when presurized. The capacitor may store sufficient power to do extra work. A DPDT switch and zener diode would help. Thinner plates could work into a sandwich stack, with one magnet wire threaded between the multiple thin finely machined playing card size plates. Finely machined prefabricated steel spacers or fat steel washers are available off the shelf. 100 grams of Barium Titinate nano powder is available for $41. from this supplier:


http://www.advancedmaterials.us/5622ON-01.htm

[synchro1]

Hildenbrand switch:

[MarkE]

Notice in the latching video, there's a paper spacer between the magnet and keeper. A gadolinmium keeper would yield not only fly back and Piezo power, but maximum adiabatic differential as well.

Coating one of Dr. Jone's steel blocks with a film of Piezo transducer compound like nano powder Barium Titanate in alcohol solution may generate and store enough power in a capacitor to latch and unlatch the magnetic bond. Reversing the spark polarity unlocks the bond. The steel blocks would act as the Piezo transducer electrodes. The charge rate would determine the latch frequency. Thinner plates might bond just as good. The Piezo electric layer spikes power upon release as well as when presurized. The capacitor may store sufficient power to do extra work. A DPDT switch and zener diode would help. Thinner plates could work into a sandwich stack, with one magnet wire threaded between the multiple thin finely machined playing card size plates. Finely machined prefabricated steel spacers or fat steel washers are available off the shelf. 100 grams of Barium Titinate nano powder is available for $41. from this supplier:


http://www.advancedmaterials.us/5622ON-01.htm

Synchro1 since you're interested, the best thing for you to do is to build up an experiment and see if it adheres to your hopes or conventional physics.  A common mistake that people make with biased magnetics is that they miscalculate the input magnetization energy going from B_BIAS to B_{BIAS_PLUS_ENERGIZED}.  For perfectly linear magnetics, which is the case you are trying to approach, the incremental input energy required to magnetize from:  B_BIAS to 2*B_BIAS is 3X the energy required to magnetize from 0 to B_BIAS.

[nul-points]

hello Steven and NerzhDishual

apologies for the long gaps in posting - i am continuing to investigate and log behaviour of related ccts

current tests are looking at 2 pulse ccts, with energy being returned both to their own sources (battery) and to each others - efficiency is high but currently still less than unity

i thought that you guys might be interested in the attached data

prompted by reading a 'paper' recently, describing the possibility of 'inverted population' action when magnetizing the core of a coil, and which suggested that there will be some evidence of energy flow into the core due to negentropic action, i started measuring the temperature inside the inner gap of the toroid compared with the temperature a little distance away from the toroid

the data is showing a definite drop in average temperature within the toroid (measured with two different probes and monitor devices)

the attached data is rather weird in that the temperature readings appear to be 'frequency modulated'!

it is unlikely that the cyclic nature of the temperature data is EMF pickup from the pulse circuit, since the pulse rate is approx 1 Hz and the temperature cycles recorded are many times slower than that (and indeed vary quite significantly themselves, depending on probe location)

data for 'ambient' temperature, as recorded inside one of the monitor cases, is by contrast very flat, increasing slowly from approx 21.25 to 21.5 degC throughout the period of data shown


i've normalised the graph data against the ambient temperature readings, referenced to a representative 21 degC baseline

the graph data represents temperature readings in degC against elapsed time in seconds - the probe was located initially inside the toroid for approx 5 mins, then it was relocated approx 10cms away from the toroid for approx 5 mins, then finally the probe was replaced back inside the toroid

it can be seen that the average temperature is lower within the central gap of the toroid than further away, and also that there is a cyclic nature to the temperature readings which changes significantly in frequency depending on probe location


interesting?

all the best
np


[edited to clarify direction of entropy change]