Eddy currents and their implications

[e2matrix]

I deleted the earlier ones as I saw no one had downloaded them yet.  I wanted to take care of that before my chance to edit the post timed out.  If there is any reason you would like them (your pre-edit documents) uploaded again I an do that but it is my assumption you will just want the latest one available which you edited.  They are still not perfect in formatting but are much better than the one I put up early today. 

[Dave45]

Coils are the generator, they produce a field that organizes and puts in motion the either, that can be collected, but we have to use a different approach to collect the field. Coils are very inefficient at collecting the field, with a coil there will always be loses.
With permanent magnets there will always be loses because your trying to collect the field outside the magnet where the field expands, it must be done in the core.

I would think a toroid would probably be the best choice because most of the field is pulled into the core.
When you pull energy from the field the either will replace it instantly and we create a sink once this is done energy will be boundless.

Think outside the box
the field must be collected efficiently
it is the field we want, that is the electricity
enough ranting
Dave

[MotovilovDN]

I deleted the earlier ones as I saw no one had downloaded them yet.  I wanted to take care of that before my chance to edit the post timed out.  If there is any reason you would like them (your pre-edit documents) uploaded again I an do that but it is my assumption you will just want the latest one available which you edited.  They are still not perfect in formatting but are much better than the one I put up early today.

Work has been done very much.
The latest version of the PDF was the mostpowerful, almost like the original.
There are some minor errors of machine translation. (Company names, theorems and surnames, first names are correct as: "Rohde and Schwarz", "Casimir Gurskiy". And "Theorem of Motovilov" too).
Thank, e2matrix!

[MotovilovDN]

Последние весÑ,и эÑ,ого сайÑ,а: появился  доброÑ...оÑ,, коÑ,орый выпросил сокращÑ'нный варианÑ, моей книги "Теория поÑ,оков энергии", обещал перевесÑ,и на английский и размесÑ,иÑ,ÑŒ для общего пользования. После Ñ,ого, как перевод с моей помощью пошÑ'л на лад, взял Ñ,айм-ауÑ, и исчез вмесÑ,е с дорабоÑ,анным варианÑ,ом. Не слышен уже несколько месяцев.

[Low-Q]

Coils are the generator, they produce a field that organizes and puts in motion the either, that can be collected, but we have to use a different approach to collect the field. Coils are very inefficient at collecting the field, with a coil there will always be loses.
With permanent magnets there will always be loses because your trying to collect the field outside the magnet where the field expands, it must be done in the core.

I would think a toroid would probably be the best choice because most of the field is pulled into the core.
When you pull energy from the field the either will replace it instantly and we create a sink once this is done energy will be boundless.

Think outside the box
the field must be collected efficiently
it is the field we want, that is the electricity
enough ranting
Dave

A generator is generally speaking a very efficient transformer of mechanical to electrical energy. Even with weak magnets, and bad coils. There is only one thing to keep as low as possible, that is the resistance in the coil windings.

Look at it this way. A weak ferrite magnet is 1m away from the coil. The magnet is spinning with north/south crossing the coil. We can understand that there would not be much energy to harvest from the coil. But the input energy is also very low. With a magnet that far away, it takes litterally no energy to turn it, and litterally no energy out of the coil. Input and output energy corresponds - they are related to eachother and the efficiency are still high.

Vidar.