Eddy currents and their implications

[Dave45]

The problem with science is that they overcomplicate .
Its really very simple

[MotovilovDN]

The problem with science is that they overcomplicate .
Its really very simple

Agreed.
There are an unscientific ways, even religious, or experiential.
They are methods of Testatiki and some also methods  of Tesla.
Roads a lot, but they all lead to one goal. I already wrote about this earlier today.

[e2matrix]

My friend. It is not difficult. The reasons put forth do not make sense, and so, need to be replaced.

Vectors cannot describe arcs.

Simple.

Quaternions were originally used, and referred to by Tesla in his work. Only with circular motion, can the rotation path of the Eddy currents formed be described. Only with circles can matter be resolved. There is no reason to match the masses of the wide, short primary wind, with the long, narrow secondary, apart from the fact that the tail of the Eddy current, before it loops upon itself, intersects with the secondary, delivering momentum to the impressed voltage and amperage at the load, thereby retaining and sustaining the standing wave motion within the primary and allowing the power generated to be removed from the secondary without effecting the primary, providing certain limits are maintained.

Frankly.

Making note of this for myself and maybe others in case anyone skimmed over this.  Sounds like a path to OU.  I believe you are also saying it is important for the weight or mass of the secondary and primary to be equal? 

[frankly]

Hi Motovilov.

Sorry, but you seem to be avoiding the questions put to you. Either you can describe how you think I am wrong, and where, with facts and your theories, or you cannot.

You say there is a patent? Please, post a copy here, in English, so we all may understand the nuts and bolts of your thoughts.

I think I asked you earlier, to describe your theory. Simply stating that it is established with medals somewhere or other, does not do this.

I have been pouring out my 13 years of research here, in a free and open manner, trying to put forth the reasons behind what I see, and explaining the workings of things as I see them.

Yet, there you sit, in the background, with god knows what resources, perhaps gleaning what you can, developing new theories from the words of others, so that you can pass them off as your own?

No. Not anymore. I am done. There has been no feedback, no conversation into the methods we could use, only one device design put forth, and just me, explaining away, thinking this is the way it is done, and then people like you come along, a MODERATOR of the forum, and refuse to elaborate on your own ideas?

I feared this would be the case.

If you do find it within yourself to freely share the truth, as I have done, that would be great. If not, well. Each to their own. We will all know then, who you are.

As to everyone else here, I will continue to read the posts for a little while, but until the time comes when science and research is once more done freely and openly, for the advancement of the human race, based upon logic and reason and not twisted bullshit that doesn't make sense, in order to deceive and confuse those that would understand and as a whole entity and not for capitalist ends, I am gone.

Frankly.

[MotovilovDN]

My experience over 40 years, says the following:

There is no other way of knowing my work, like reading the original.
Unfortunately, it is in Russian. However, I laid him open to you.

If I was lecturing in the U.S., then I would be a good translator and I could teach a lot of people. It's true.

If you want me to explain to you here the whole point in a nutshell, this is impossible. I think you and myself know this: because very few people here understand your reasoning as well as you own.

German patent here I also did not show, there is this reason.
I think that what little has already posted earlier today, in any case will be useful to know.

However, I am always glad to your success and willing to answer questions that may have here a clear answer to you.
Sincerely - Motovilov