Was Bessler for real?

[kolbacict]

You told perpetuum mobile doesn't exist. It seems me,I know how do one.
It is enough to make one magic wand (or philosopher's stone), and then touch any aggregate, it will become over-unit. We will have a huge number of perpetuum mobile... 

[onepower]

stivep

In reality, the conservation of mass only holds approximately and is considered part of a series of assumptions
in classical mechanics
The law has to be modified to comply with the laws of quantum mechanics and special relativity
under the principle of mass–energy equivalence which states that energy and mass form one conserved quantity.
For very energetic systems the conservation of mass only is shown not to hold,
as is the case in nuclear reactions and particle-antiparticle annihilation in particle physics

Apparently ChatGPT and I think your talking bullshit...

Question: is  particle-antiparticle annihilation common in nature?.

Answer:Particle-antiparticle annihilation is a fundamental process in particle physics, but it is not common in everyday or natural occurrences that we observe on a macroscopic scale. Particle-antiparticle annihilation typically occurs in high-energy environments, such as particle accelerators or in the early universe.

Which is exactly the answer I expected based on my knowledge. Nuclear reactions like fission/fusion simple rearrange the geometry of the atom adding/subtracting particles and releasing energy in the process. It does not destroy or annihilate matter which is absurd. I agree particle-antiparticle annihilation can occur in particle accelerators but this is an exception to the rules commonly found in nature.

Question:does fission or fusion annihilate or destroy particles?

Answer:Fission and fusion do not annihilate or destroy particles in the sense of particle-antiparticle annihilation, where both particles and antiparticles are completely converted into energy. Instead, fission and fusion involve nuclear reactions that change the structure of atomic nuclei.

Why are you trying to mislead people my Russian troll?, did you think nobody was going to fact check you?.

AC

[onepower]

Back to the actual subject were debating, the Bessler wheel...

I have done countless experiments on mechanical systems in the past most have heard of. Very few panned out although I did learn quite a bit about what can and cannot work. It was only after I did the experiments that I learned were my intuition mislead me. It was most often something obvious, some effect I had failed to consider. Here theory doesn't count and we have to build it to prove to ourselves whether we were right or wrong in our thinking. Facts matter...

If a person does this long enough they begin to get a feel for what can and cannot work.

The basic problem is that if every element of a system like weights, levers, pendulums and such always interact with the system an equal and opposite reaction must always occur somewhere. In effect we cannot move X without the opposite of X occurring somewhere else within the system. We can pretend it doesn't but somehow it always does in some way.

What we need to keep our eye on is not weight but the "momentum" or mass-velocity of every working element. The energy of any given element is based on it's mass and kinetic energy(how fast it's moving). Ergo, heavy stuff in motion has more energy than light stuff at the same velocity. Likewise stuff moving faster has more energy than stuff moving slower if the mass were the same. Common sense stuff we can do basic experiments with to prove for ourselves.

I cannot say I'm obsessed with the Bessler wheel or similar systems but I have been looking at it off and on for about 20 years. I like it because it's really hard to wrap our mind around and makes us think. The harder and more complex the problem the more I like it, it's a mystery, a puzzle. No harm in that, nothing crazy about it, and many people do jigsaw puzzles, crossword puzzles and play chess for similar reasons, it's the challenge which moves us.

With that, a big fuck you to all the critics and to everyone else happy experimenting...

AC

[stivep]

//With that, a big fuck you to all the critics and to everyone else happy experimenting...//
AC

Typically 4 levels of questioning constitutes discussion .
   https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/studystrategizesucceed/chapter/another-approach-four-levels-of-questioning/
       Rhetoric is language used to motivate, inspire, inform, or persuade readers.
           Some readers do not fit mentally and verbally into any level other than "street talk" level.
               https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/street%20talk
                   Wesley   

[onepower]

stivep

Typically 4 levels of questioning constitutes discussion .
   https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/studystrategizesucceed/chapter/another-approach-four-levels-of-questioning/
       Rhetoric is language used to motivate, inspire, inform, or persuade readers.
           Some readers do not fit mentally and verbally into any level other than "street talk" level.

My reference was more towards critics who gaslight others, distract and disrupt meaningful conversations.

For example, you said...

Some readers do not fit mentally and verbally into any level other than "street talk" level.

Implying that because I cursed I am not mentally fit to interact on any other level than street talk. This is exactly how people who gaslight talk always making indirect references to degrade and belittle. They continually harass other people then when confronted feign victim hood. 

So to recap, of all the information and concepts I offered your only interested in the curse word so you could imply I'm not "mentally fit".

I thought this was interesting...
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/290817/why-intelligent-people-swear-more-than-others.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/intelligent-people-tend-to-be-messy-stay-awake-longer-and-swear-more-a7174256.html
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/questions-character/202102/are-people-who-curse-actually-more-honest

Which would seem to contradict your false assertion that people who curse are not as mentally fit as others. In fact the opposite would seem to be true which is why we should always check our premise...

AC