New videos found on youtube, tiny generator with 2 coils

[WilbyInebriated]

Yes, that's the question, and the answer is "NO", it doesn't. If it did, it could run itself. In the first video, you can see the voltage on the cap decreasing steadily during the short time he shows the voltage. And in the second video, there is clearly a battery.
As has been stated, the no-load voltage is meaningless, especially when measured by a six-dollar voltmeter. The fact that it can light up a bunch of LEDs and/or a NE-2 shouldn't be surprising to anyone here. Why doesn't he go the next step, and show it running on a battery that it charged itself, like I have done? Maybe it just hasn't occurred to him yet.

It's a neat little motor though.

the answer is no? really? what evidence do you have? where is your "replication"? how do you know the battery wasn't charging? you're just adding more assumption(s) from the peanut gallery. why am i not surprised?

yes it is a neat motor. much more elegant than any of your kludges (except your ocpmm hoax of course).

[Poit]

assumptions? you are kidding right? there is no assumptions....... he did not show a voltage and amperage coming out of the machine.

It would be like me claiming to have a really awesome new car wheel brake technology and not showing the wheel stop...

if anything the guy who did the videos was assuming quite a lot with his maths on what he THINKS the current is (i.e leds 25miliamps etc etc)..... why would he show information about his own assumptions on the device when its right in front of him to put a multimeter on!!! what a joke!

[Low-Q]

the answer is no? really? what evidence do you have? where is your "replication"? how do you know the battery wasn't charging? you're just adding more assumption(s) from the peanut gallery. why am i not surprised?

yes it is a neat motor. much more elegant than any of your kludges (except your ocpmm hoax of course).

There is no proof of overunity in this video. There is a reason why not all measurements are covered.
When he tested all the LEDs, all of them was in parallell. The white ones are ran by approx 3.7 - 4.2VDC to lit properly. These LEDs was very dimmed, so the voltage was probably not more than 1.5 to 2V max - initial voltage was 65V. That tells much about the poor energy capacity of the powersource. The current through the LEDs will drop CONSIDERABLY when voltage drops under 3.6V. So there was not much energy out of the "generator". A few micro amps at max is my guess based on the observations - at 1.5 - 2V. That says a lot about this device. That we could say is a proof of a non-over unity device.

Vidar

[Poit]

I agree... so far all that has been presented is proof of a non-over unity device

[WilbyInebriated]

that is what constitutes proof to you? a youtube video?



you should learn what a proof is... power is not energy, a youtube video is not proof... tra la la