Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Started by Overunityguide, August 30, 2011, 04:59:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

CRANKYpants

HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO ALL MY FELLOW CANADIAN TURKEY GOBBLERS OUT THERE!  :)
CHEERS
T

gotoluc

Hi everyone,

I have an update on the Transformer Delayed Lenz Effect.

See Video for explanation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZtIhOV00uU

The below Scope Shots are:
Ch 1 Yellow Probe is 10 Ohm Shunt Resistor, Ch 2 Lt. Blue is Coil Voltage, Ch 3 Purple is Secondary Coil 10 Ohm Load and Ch 4 is Resonator Coil 10 Ohm Load

First is Transformer @ 60Hz no Load
Second is Transformer @ 60Hz with Secondary on 10 Ohm Load
Third is Transformer @ 60Hz with Secondary on 10 Ohm Load and 29uf on Resonating Coil

Please post your comments and Power Calculations. Keep in mind the Shunt Resistor is 10 Ohms and not 1 Ohm.

Luc

gyulasun

Hi Luc,

When the secondary coils are unloaded the input power is approximately: Pin=V*I*cos82°   (I estimated from the scope shots the input voltage leads current by about 82°. How I got this 82°: the time difference between input voltage and current is about 3.8msec, this gives roughly 82°.)

So Pin=5.96*0.0508*cos82°=0.0421W

Loaded case, no capacitor, I noticed no change in the 82° phase shift :

input power  Pin=5.57*0.0548*cos82°=0.04248W

output power  Pout=0.5772/10=0.03329W

Loaded case with capacitor, I noticed the phase shift decreased to about 34.5° from 82°, this means it is decisive to watch on the scope only the voltage drop decrease across the shunt resistor, you have to consider any change in the phase shift too.

input power Pin=5.2*0.0457*cos34.5°=0.1958W

output power Pout=0.6742/10=0.04542W

circulating power in the LC (140mH 39uF) tank circuit, assuming resonance  PLC=0.4842/10=0.02342W

Efficiency in the loaded case, no cap:
Pout/Pin=(0.03329W/0.04248W)*100=78.3%

Efficiency in the loaded case with cap:
(Pout + PLC)/Pin=(0.04542W + 0.02342W)/0.1958W=0.3515*100=35.15%

So it seems this setup now behaves as a conventional transformer when there is no 39uF tuning cap connected. When the 39uF is connected to the till then 140mH idle coil, efficiency suffers, probably due to the change in the phase shift in the input voltage-current.

(I recall the 140mH coils have got a DC resistance between 120 to 180 Ohms?)

Gyula

gotoluc

Hi Gyula,

thank you for doing the power calculations.

As you can see I have no idea how to do AC Power Calculations yet but there is hope as I now understand that a higher voltage across the Shunt Resistor does not necessarily matter if the Phase (cos angle) stays the same. Do I have that correct?

I decided to look at Phase much closer on the Scope and found it did shift @60Hz.

In the First scope Shot below I expended to Scopes Voltage divisions so we could clearly see where they fall at the Zero point.
For loads I decided to separate the 2 Secondaries and used a 10 Ohm Load on each.
I found that it's only @248Hz that there is Zero Phase Shift when under Load. See Second Shot below. Frequencies above 248Hz the Phase slowly goes up and below 248Hz Phase slowly drops.

The First Shot below is the no load centered Reference. We have exactly 4 squares between each side of the rising and dropping voltage phase. Each square should be 22.5 degrees, so then one of the 5 divisions in each square should be 4.5 degrees. The Current is 3 divisions behind the Voltage (3 x 4.5 = 13.5) so 90 - 13.5 = 76.5 degrees.

So would you agree this is an accurate way to get Phase degree?

Third Shot is Complete view.

Can you re-calculate the power in vs power out with this more accurate data.

I still don't understand how you came up with the numbers above so I better let you do it. Hopefully in time I will be able to learn the equations ;D

Thanks for your time Guyla... I'll get there one step at the time thanks to people like you who are willing to help.

Luc

CRANKYpants

Quote from: gotoluc on October 16, 2011, 12:53:17 PM
The Current is 3 divisions behind the Voltage (3 x 4.5 = 13.5) so 90 - 13.5 = 76.5 degrees.
Luc

ACTUALLY LUC THE CURRENT LAGS THE VOLTAGE BY 17 DIVISIONS AND 17 x 4.5 = 76.5 DEGREES
I know it's anal but... ;)

SO YOUR POWER IN = Vprimary x Iprimary x COS 76.5 (COS 76.5 = 0.233)
SO YOUR POWER IN = Vprimary x Iprimary x 0.233

Pout = Vload^2 / Rload

CHEERS
T