Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Started by Overunityguide, August 30, 2011, 04:59:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mondrasek

Quote from: Overunityguide on August 31, 2011, 05:11:52 PM
I have removed the generator rotor, so the shaft only was turning.

@Overunityguide, when you removed the generator rotor, you also removed all the air drag that the rotor, and especially the projecting magnets and retaining screws, creates.  So this would result in decreased power consumption.  So I don't think you can compare that 66 watt reading to any of the others.

Did you test WITH the rotor, but WITHOUT the coil?

Thanks,

M.

Overunityguide

Quote from: mondrasek on September 01, 2011, 10:31:05 AM
@Overunityguide, when you removed the generator rotor, you also removed all the air drag that the rotor, and especially the projecting magnets and retaining screws, creates.  So this would result in decreased power consumption.  So I don't think you can compare that 66 watt reading to any of the others.

Did you test WITH the rotor, but WITHOUT the coil?

Thanks,

M.

@mondrasek,

I have just tried it and with the rotor, without the coil it runs at about 68 / 69 Watts idle on 3000 rpm

With Kind Regards, Overunityguide

Confirming the Negative Lenz Effect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzxc3Ai4T3A

Overunityguide

After A couple of people asked for it digitally, here is my schematic

Kind Regards, Overunityguide
Thane C Heins Replication, Confirming the Negative Lenz Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzxc3Ai4T3A

minde4000

Quote from: Overunityguide on September 02, 2011, 03:41:20 PM
After A couple of people asked for it digitally, here is my schematic

Kind Regards, Overunityguide
Thane C Heins Replication, Confirming the Negative Lenz Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzxc3Ai4T3A

I have this kind of setup with high impedance single wire coil and bifilar coil and up to 3600 rpm driver with 18 NS magnets. Nothing special... You could follow thread on TC Heins device replication attempt. Me and at  least a couple of other replicators didnt get much. Accelerations "effect" is also simply explainable trick.  8)

Minde

teslaalset

@Overunityguide,

Can I ask you for a calibration measurement?
What is the actual power consumed when the whole coil setup is removed?

I am asking this because if the coil units contributes to let say 5 W of extra losses (e.g. eddy current losses in the core of the HV coil) and you notice a power drop of 2 W when connecting the load, you will still end up with 3 W of losses and this will be a very misleading experiment.

Thanks in advance,

Teslaalset,
Fellow Dutch forum member