Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Started by Overunityguide, August 30, 2011, 04:59:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

DeepCut

Quote from: Newton II on March 20, 2013, 11:49:29 PM


I don't understnd the logic in the above statement.   Input power to the motor is 360 watts.  Total output is 384 watts @ 16 watts/coil.   Which means from the out put of 384 Watts if you feed 360 watts back to the motor, you will be left with just 24 watts of useful power output to run your bike.   Will your bike run with just 24 Watts?
Is it a toy bike?

As for I know a 100CC bike produces a power output of 7 to 8 BHP which is around 5 to 6 Kilo Watts to pull two persons sitting on it.


With 24 watts output you can make a toy bike to pull a rat sitting on it.   Am I right?

Yes, you're absolutely right. Apart from the rat bit.

I think the plan is to miniaturise anyone who wants to ride on the bike.

Seriously though, i think you've misread the statement.

If you read the part of the statement that you quoted, it says the 'bike motor', not 'the motor'.


atb,

DC.



Newton II

Quote from: DeepCut on March 21, 2013, 07:28:10 AM

If you read the part of the statement that you quoted, it says the 'bike motor', not 'the motor'.

DC.


Thanks DC for correcting me.  Does it mean that  the 24 coils produce  384 watts without taking any power input?  In that case the inventor deserves Nobel Prize?
If not what is the input power required to produce 384 watts?

synchro1

Newton II,

Thane's "Regenerative Motor Alternator" generates power while under load. The battery's charging while the bike is powered by the 360 watts. This means that you return from the trip with 24 more watts then you left with, after powering the bike for eight hours with the entire 360 watts! That's merely 1/2 a horsepower, but plenty to sail along at average road speed on a flat course. The system only self charges while under load!

They'll be no Nobel Prize for Thane Heins, primarily because the speed up effect of high impedance output coils on magnet rotors was a well established effect, observed by numerous experimenters, long before Thane ever got involved with it.  Everyone went up the same tree with it that Thane's perched in with his complaint of 3 laboratory ransackings. All Thane's regenerative patents are practically worthless because the effect is too ordinary and well documented going all the way back to Nicola Tesla; Like trying to patent a new food dehydrator! Thane won't address my magnet core discovery, because it's too simple, and sends all his proprietary work to a trash dumpster. The magnet core allows for overunity with a mere fraction of Thane's bulky copper wire coil wraps. I've been sedate about the discovery to not rock Thane's boat, but I'm forcing it out now!

DeepCut

Quote from: Newton II on March 21, 2013, 08:58:50 AM

Thanks DC for correcting me.  Does it mean that  the 24 coils produce  384 watts without taking any power input?  In that case the inventor deserves Nobel Prize?
If not what is the input power required to produce 384 watts?

You could spend time asking lots of questions and i could spend time answering them

OR

You could watch the videos and read the documents, i've started a detailed thread about it over here :

http://www.overunity.com/13398/pdi-regenerative-acceleration-and-bitt-principles/msg355247/#msg355247

Thane will pop in to answer questions as and when he can, too.

It's a very interesting effect, i have been studying it for a while now and it just gets more and more interesting.

Some people cry "impedance matching" or "reactive power", but it's neither.

It violates the work-energy principle completely.

I hope you enjoy learning about it as much as i did and am :)


All the best,

DC.

hoptoad

Quote from: synchro1 on March 21, 2013, 09:03:37 AM
snip...
All Thane's regenerative patents are practically worthless because the effect is too ordinary and well documented going all the way back to Nicola Tesla; Like trying to patent a new food dehydrator! Thane won't address my magnet core discovery, because it's too simple, and sends all his proprietary work to a trash dumpster. The magnet core allows for overunity with a mere fraction of Thane's bulky copper wire coil wraps. I've been sedate about the discovery to not rock Thane's boat, but I'm forcing it out now!

Thanes boat was leaky and sinking from the start, so rocking it won't make any difference, but have I missed something ?
Have you already posted some details of your own setup here on o/uCom ?
Do you have any links to information regarding your setup ? Any chance of you providing a bit more info ?
Always curious..
Cheers