How do you make Money from an overunity device that can not be patented?

[WilbyInebriated]

Wilby your history is not irrelevant, although I am sure you would like it to be, in my opinion you are the most prolific troll that has ever appeared on this forum.

my history is irrelevant. were are not talking about what i am doing... we are talking about what justsomeguy is doing. thus any mention of my history is either an attempt to misdirect (red herring) or ad hominem tu quo que... why don't you go familiarize yourself with the basic fallacies?

The logical fallacy argument is one you trot out far to often, only occasionally do you bother to explain why you consider the argument to be fallacious.

not my fault hardly anyone here knows what a cogent argument is...  i get tired of explaining why something is a fallacy only to see it repeated again and again and again... now why don't you go to nizkor.org and learn what the various fallacies are  so i don't have to hold your hand and step you through a cogent argument...

My implication that he would be responsible for 22,000 children dying per day is not a logical fallacy, by the very pursuit and attainment of a free energy device the inventor has made himself ethically responsible, by achieving the ability to effect real change in this regard he has presented himself with a choice, and therefore a responsibility.

yes, it is... it does not follow... non sequitur, which all fallacies are. just because you "feel", "believe" or whatever... doesn't make it so. he is NOT responsible regardless of whatever your moral compass "believes"... tu stultus es... furthermore, "ethics" are subjective... again, tu stultus es.

I said you do not understand the significance and importance of an easily replicable overunity device. This is not gross hyperbole, you implied this when you said 22,000 kids died and how is that your responsibility ?

yes it is gross hyperbole. i understand the significance of unlimited energy for every man, woman, child as well as you do. to suggest i don't simply because i don't agree with your little 'morality issue' is asinine. the hyperbole was demonstrated by you with your gross exaggerations and misrepresentations of what i actually said.

To suggest that an individual gives away every asset he owns is ridiculous. To do so would barely make a dent in the problem and would prevent a stable base from which to address the root of the problem, which is the control of energy.

you have no evidence that it would barely make a dent. i never suggested that an individual "give away everything" can you provide a quote of where i said that? no you cannot. you are simply engaging in more of your hyperbole and misrepresentation! here is what is ridiculous... to suggest that i am responsible for someone else.

I was in error when I said you stated you care not for your neighbours child and would happily watch them die, it would have been more accurate to say that it was my interpretation of what you said. Considering your selfish attitude I do not think I was far from the truth.

yeah you were in error. that was another example of your gross hyperbole. think what you want. you don't know me son...

So what is your purpose on this forum ? Why do you stalk the threads like a predator waiting for an opportunity to attack people via the manipulation of language ?

RM

my purpose is irrelevant to the topic at hand... but since you love your logical fallacies i'll tell you...  i'm the logic police. and if you are engaging in logical fallacy you'll probably hear from me. more so if you are self-righteous or presenting yourself as an 'expert' or 'authority'.

i can play your fallacy game too... what is your purpose? to come here and attack anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion? to call those who don't agree with you trolls? are you the spawn of omnibus?

[WilbyInebriated]

An overunity device is not a winning lottery ticket. One will alter the structure of our society on this planet, the other will enrich an individual beyond what they require for survival.

RM

assumption... you have no evidence to support this statement.

[Qwert]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Cassette
"Although there were other magnetic tape cartridge systems, the Compact Cassette became dominant as a result of Philips' decision in the face of pressure from Sony to license the format free of charge. Philips also released the Norelco Carry-Corder 150 recorder/player in the U.S. in November 1964. By 1966 over 250,000 recorders had been sold in the US alone and Japan soon became the major source of recorders. By 1968, 85 manufacturers had sold over 2.4 million players."
This above statement can be an evidence of the dillemma: how to make money without having exclusive licence: just start production, there is enough room for all the producers.

[Justsomeguy]

That would be a fine idea, if you already had a factory, a couple years of design and tooling, suppliers lined up and ready to ship, and a huge amount of money to pay all of those people.  Unfortunately, I don't have that set up. As soon as the very first one goes out the door, China and many others will be cranking them out in a week.  My money needs to be made on the sale of the technology, not the products.

[fritznien]

sell the power!
boot strap up from your own use to pushing gigawatts to the grid.
by the time anyone figures it out you should be up to megawatts and have some serious cash flow.
you did build a working model to power your home right?