another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

25 million is alot, to the point where I am a little concerned about safety.

Rosemary, are you concerned that if this circuit is replicated that the excess energy produced from it will have a negative impact on the earth?  In theory, you could have quite a large explosion when you have unlimited energy produced from a small space.  Nature has evolved to naturally deal with under-unity sources of energy, which are limited in nature, but this unlimited energy could really pose a challenge.

Do you have any suggestions for those of us who plan to use this circuit for home heating and so forth?  How can we use this energy safely so that it does not wreak havoc on earth climate?

LOL eatenbyagrue.  I'm not sure.  Come to think of it - it is somewhat alarming.  Hopefully there's been a minor miscalculation somewhere there. 

Thanks for this post.  I've had my first laugh of the day.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello MileHigh

I see you're still muttering there.  You may very well be right.  It may be that the battery is entirely responsible for generating all  that energy.  It may be that there is nothing to this claim - nor this circuit.  In which case?  We'll find out from the experimental evidence.  Which is as it should be. 

MileHigh - you're 'ace' at electronics.  I know this.  Do one of your famous analyses and explain the positive half of the waveform and it's path.  But don't put in the nonsense about the moving through the function generator terminals.  Because you must remember that there's a negative signal at that Q1 Gate.  The current can't pass through there.  And the config is EXACTLY as I sketched it.  I REALLY want to know some viable explanation. 

And I LOVE your choice of poetry.  Dylan is absolutely my favourite poet - and the greatest artist EVER - let alone from the 60's. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose.

[SeaMonkey]

Rosemary,

It has been a very long while since I've commented
and I'm very delighted to discover that you're in
good spirits and intellectually as agile as ever!!

Now I need to get caught up on what's been going
down...
- - - - - Added thoughts:

Woa!!  Some pretty potent happenings have gone
down!!

I should also like to thank Stefan for being so
accommodating and so tolerant.

Regarding all of the flames and Trollerization-
you have reason to be very proud Rosemary.
The psychological implications (regarding the
Trolls) are really quite revealing.

Obviously, the Trolls hold you in very high
regard; even admire your intellect and tenacity.
At the same time it arouses feelings of inferiority
within them which they simply cannot brook.

Love-Hate at work.  Freud was correct about one
thing - men develop attitudes which affect their
ability to interact with women from their Mothers.

The conduct of the Trolls does not reflect well on
that relationship.  What compels them to attack a
woman so viciously?  What are they revealing to
the World about themselves?

Congratulations to you Rosemary!  You've done
well.

[Magluvin]

lol  Muttering.  Priceless 

Mags

[Magluvin]

I want to understand something here...

When Roses circuit is in oscillation, can that oscillation, positive peaks and negative peaks, be measured at the battery? To say, if I had a hypothetical current meter in line at the battery terminal, will I see the same "current" fluctuations at the load?

If so, and we used the hypothetical dual LED, input/output test proposed earlier, one led works in one current direction and the other led when the current is in the opposite direction, then the contention is that only one of those LEDs is going to light, showing that total currents are only flowing in 1 direction in Roses circuit when in oscillation???  From the battery? Never ever into the battery? Never? Never ever? Oscillation definition?

That would be saying that only DC flows through the circuit at any time, no?

What happened to the oscillation? That "alternating current" through the circuit during oscillation? That alternating current would have to flow through one led at a time depending on the phase. This one lights, then that one lights with each phase of operation. No? 


In my opinion, Using LEDs as a throughput, even many on each branch, it would change the circuit quite a bit from the original form. No? Voltage drops, limited currents... as compared to the original circuit.

How much AC current is flowing in the unmodified version of of Roses circuit, during each phase of oscillation? Peak AC current, each direction of oscillation, is what I would be interested in knowing.

Only 1 led lights.  hmm.

Mags