another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[powercat]

Hi Cat,

What surprises me is the Quantum 2002 article was about a COP>17 thingamabob device ...... and now it's a COP INFINITY device she want to show in court that I copied and stole  ??  ODD .....   

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316302/#msg316302    Reply #1379 on: March 21, 2012, 11:08:59 PM

Else how can I get my apparatus to Court for some kind of evaluation?  That's my ONLY motivation here.  I intend to rather opportunistically produce all that evidence of COP INFINITY.    


Fuzzy

Hi Fuzzy

I can hear the judge now........ Rosemary Ainslie you are a delusional fantasist who will be sentence to........

Yes you can serve time in prison for making false claims
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2030532/Plastic-para-fantasist-spent-years-claiming-hero-soldier-despite-serving-cook-jailed-fraud.html

[TinselKoala]

@eatenbyagrue: Rosemary certainly knows that her claim of infinite COP is bogus. Why else does she resist doing the very simple tests that I and others have suggested? If I believed that I had something like that, you can bet your bottom dollar that I would perform the test I suggested, at least, immediately to end all controversy about it.
What would you do? Would you continually argue falsely as she has done, or would you simply PUT THE SIMPLE COMPONENTS TOGETHER and DO AN UNAMBIGUOUS TEST of the battery recharging. It's something any smart tenth-grader in a Houston high school could do in a week as a science fair project.


This is the only way Rosemary can "win" any of her arguments: by attrition. Eventually, she outlasts them all by driving them nuts with her denial of reality, they fade away or the thread gets closed, and Rosemary moves on to another group of hopeful experimenters to sucker into wasting their time with her false claims, math errors, and reversals of reality, like she's tried to do with THE GREEN TRACE on her OWN VIDEO.

[eatenbyagrue]

If I believed that I had something like that, you can bet your bottom dollar that I would perform the test I suggested, at least, immediately to end all controversy about it.

Oh come on, what would be the fun in that?  You know how these tests go with overunity devices.  They never go well, and then it's over.  The joy is in the ride, not the destination, so give the circuit a little more time to smell the roses.

[TinselKoala]

eatenbyagrue said, "Oh, and another required element is that the plaintiff must rely on the false representation to its detriment.  I have not seen any of you actually rely on what Rosemary is saying.  You contest her claims every step of the way.  So I say, no fraud case here!"

But... don't you understand the nature of FuzzyTomCat's involvement with Rosemary? It sure looks to me like he relied on Rosemary's false representations to his detriment. And that's just one example. Go over to Energetic Forum and ask Ashtweth about his involvement, and whether or not it was to his detriment. Examples abound of people trying to PROVE HER RIGHT.... and failing. Of course the scientific method consists mainly of trying to prove hypotheses WRONG.... and every test of Rosemary's "hypotheses" concerning this circuit have proven them to be wrong.

Of course by now we don't even know what the circuit even IS anymore, due to her errors which FTC and I have pointed out. Look at the VIDEO....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc
.... Rosemary's team posted. Look carefully ! The diagram shown on paper isn't the circuit demonstrated; the demonstrated circuit even has errors; as far as I can tell I am the only one who has tested many different possible variants. The consensus seems to be that the Q1-Q2 mosfet circuit is "actually" what is built in that video... but now I have my questions even about that, since the gate of the single mosfet is connected to the point marked "F" on the board, which is the common drains indicated on the paper diagram..... how many different ways is that wrong? I've lost count.

[TinselKoala]

Oh come on, what would be the fun in that?  You know how these tests go with overunity devices.  They never go well, and then it's over.  The joy is in the ride, not the destination, so give the circuit a little more time to smell the roses.

You are right about that. The problem in the present case is that the circuit and claims have been "riding" for ten years now, since the original Quantum article and circuit posted above in the thread somewhere. The circuit has "smelled the roses" and has gotten Rosemary banned from, since I've been following her, the Naked Scientists forum, the Energetic Forum (panacea u), this forum several times, and maybe more that I'm not aware of.  Like I said, she simply wears down her detractors... like me, I have to leave to go to work half an hour ago, but I need to refute her constant LIES about me, and it's getting rather old. YEARS of smelling those old roses growing out of the garbage. If only they were roses, instead of nettles.