another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[MileHigh]

More like in _your_ dreams Rosemary.

We just saw some foreshadowing of the big upcoming tear burst.  You pigheadedly stuck to an incorrect assumption about something you didn't understand and you adamantly refused to listen to anyone.  Then someone 'enlightened' you and now it's abject apologies all around.

Posting #1475 shows the function generator output section.  It's another example illustrating how you are pigheadedly sticking to an incorrect assumption about something that you don't even understand.  Little Miss Mosfet knows nothing about electronics yet she makes definitive statements about electronics.

So, now that we have seen the foreshadowing, and we see another fail with respect to the function generator, it's just a matter or time.

It's all about the truth Rosemary, plain and simple.  Like I said, we are not willy-nilly mindless guppies swimming against the glass in a fishbowl.  Reason and logic and the truth is infinitely more important than your 'delicious oscillation' fantasies.  The application of knowledge to make our lives better is an important principle worth defending.  That's in contrast to your 'unaware snake oil' magic waveform elixir.  You don't even know that you are peddling snake oil, which makes it that much worse.

The cloudburst of digital tears is building up, we can already hear rumblings on the horizon.

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

More like in _your_ dreams Rosemary.

We just saw some foreshadowing of the big upcoming tear burst.  You pigheadedly stuck to an incorrect assumption about something you didn't understand and you adamantly refused to listen to anyone.  Then someone 'enlightened' you and now it's abject apologies all around.

Posting #1475 shows the function generator output section.  It's another example illustrating how you are pigheadedly are sticking to an incorrect assumption about something that you don't even understand.  Little Miss Mosfet knows nothing about electronics yet she makes definitive statements about electronics.

So, now that we have seen the foreshadowing, and we see another fail with respect to the function generator, it's just a matter or time.

It's all about the truth Rosemary, plain and simple.  Like I said, we are not willy-nilly mindless guppies swimming against the glass in a fishbowl.  Reason and logic and the truth is infinitely more important than your 'delicious oscillation' fantasies.  The application of knowledge to make our lives better is an important principle worth defending.  That's in contrast to your 'unaware snake oil' magic waveform elixir.  You don't even know that you are peddling snake oil, which makes it that much worse.

The cloudburst of digital tears is building up, we can already hear rumblings on the horizon.

MileHigh

Hello MileHigh.   
Always nice to see you paying attention. 
Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose

BTW - when are you going to do that analysis?  Surely this is within your competence?  LOL.  or lololololo - take your pick.
Again,
Rosieposie pose 'eo'.

[MileHigh]

Rosemary,

Right.  That's the 'casual, disinterested and dismissive' persona to mask the fact that you are nervous and uncomfortable, again.  Quite a bag of 'tricks' you have there.  But the truth is that what I said in my previous posting was quite serious, and you can't ignore it or dismiss it.  The current travels straight through the function generator.

I don't have to analyze your waveforms.  The burden is on you, and you did zero analysis.  You just showed what you mistakenly thought was empirical evidence of over unity from the DSO captures.  If you were serious and had the competence available (which you clearly did not) then you would have analyzed your waveforms and pointed out exactly where in the periodic oscillatory waveform a 'magic unexplainable manifestation of energy from nowhere' was. (Or was the energy from the Fantasy Zipon Follies?)  You should have been able to pinpoint it precisely with the equipment that you had - where it was within each individual cycle - but instead you did nothing.

You are not competent to discuss the waveforms with Poynt.  But, alas, most of the time you are blissfully unaware, a.k.a. unconsciously incompetent.  Ignorance is Strength in your totalitarian fantasy world.

The big Poseo is looming on the horizon.  Sort of like Puff the Magic Dragon, your green scales and digital tears are going to fall like rain.

With all of the fake arrogance you are manifesting, it's going to be quite bemusing for some of us when the incessant and profuse apologies are offered up and your poor tortured soul bursts forth in the Mother of all Swoons and the cloudbursts of tears are finally released.

MileHigh

[hoptoad]

Hello again hoptoad.  Always a pleasure to see you there.  I've actually being going through your posts which are vastly entertaining and impeccably succinct.  I think you set us all a good example.  Perhaps, given a few more years - I may also learn that art. I'm a notoriously slow learner.  Glad to see that you're keeping your comments appropriate.  I think any discussion would be vastly more relevant than the way the discussions on this thread are going.  And I know those links.  I have to reference them every time I read an acronym.  I fixate on alternatives that takes me ever more removes from reality.  And according to our trolls my own grasp of reality has always been somewhat tenuous.

The reason I went through your posts was that I seemed to recall you undertaking to do our circuit.  Did you get around to this?  If you've got the time or the interest - please let me know. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Hi Rosemary (That's my sister's name by the way)

Alas, I cannot say I have faithfully reproduced your circuit. Although I did sling together a makeshift facsimile of the circuit based on components I already had available. However, after a very short time of experimenting, I had to acknowledge the pointlessness of any run down tests because my existing supply batteries are actually kapoot,or as the techies would say, FBB. Besides that, the circuit was not really a very faithful replication anyway.

My batteries have no real capacity left and are suitable only for short term low current experiments. Sooner or later I'll have to buy some new batteries. When I do, (finances permitting), I'll probably try your circuit again.

With your novel parallel mosfet configuration, I was unable to produce an oscillation with the mosfets I had available, so I played around with a few different mosfets and eventually got a single mosfet to oscillate, by allowing the gate to float with no connection to it. This method of self oscillation is easy to achieve with low power, high gain fets, with no base connection. Plenty of circuit examples are scattered
throughout the Doc Stiffler thread. However, as I see it, the difference between Mosfets and Fets is the body diode, which is often present in Mosfets. The body diode allows any counter emf (if there is any) to flow in the opposite direction to supply emf. Fets will normally block it.

A time comparative run down test is all I would be able to perform anyway, because I don't currently possess or have access to any decent accurate measuring equipment.

Given everything I've just said, its fair to say that I cannot contribute any meaningful dialogue regarding your circuit at the moment.

Cheers and KneeDeep.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You are not competent to discuss the waveforms with Poynt.  But, alas, most of the time you are blissfully unaware, a.k.a. unconsciously incompetent.  Ignorance is Strength in your totalitarian fantasy world.

The big Poseo is looming on the horizon.  Sort of like Puff the Magic Dragon, your green scales and digital tears are going to fall like rain.

With all of the fake arrogance you are manifesting, it's going to be quite bemusing for some of us when the incessant and profuse apologies are offered up and your poor tortured soul bursts forth in the Mother of all Swoons and the cloudbursts of tears are finally released.

MileHigh

Golly - such drama.  I'll try my best to oblige you MilesUpInTheClouds.    I wonder if you're not actually just a frustrated script writer.  You're not much of a scientist.  Not when you predict so much with so little knowledge of the fact.  As a rule a scientist allows the experimental evidence to guide his theory. But I see it now.  You're not able to do that analysis.  I think the 'fail' comes when you explain how a positive current breaches negative applied signal.  Or when the current discharge must somehow stay robust notwithstanding 1050 Ohms of resistance in its path through that function generator.  But hold your focus there MileHigh.  If I can squeeze in the explanations between TK's multiple page misdirections - then I'll explain all.  And then you can deny it all.  It makes for such interesting reading.

Kindest regards, MilesOfMisdirection
Rosie Posie

Nice to see you're getting a little bit more strength in your bite.  For a while there I saw some definite signs of galloping Alzheimer's.  Some rather overwhelming evidence of senile dementia.  You need to keep on your toes.  MileHigh.  Do what I do.  Take your vitamin supplements.