another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[poynt99]

Alternatively you owe me a DETAILED DISCUSSION as to why you're rejecting our measurements?  And I wonder if I could impose on you to REFER to our papers in preference to your own.

I'd be happy to tear your paper to shreds...errr give it a critique I mean  . However, with your limited level of understanding in these matters, and resistance in adapting to modern accepted technical terms, coupled with your own twisted postulates of electric theory, I'm afraid we would be "discussing" the measurements in your paper for eons.

Perhaps if you choose ONE SPECIFIC question, I might (regrettably I suspect) oblige in giving it a go. In return, I'd ask you to provide an answer to my question in post #200, selecting one of the two choices given.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I'd be happy to tear your paper to shreds...errr give it a critique I mean  . However, with your limited level of understanding in these matters, and resistance in adapting to modern accepted technical terms, coupled with your own twisted postulates of electric theory, I'm afraid we would be "discussing" the measurements in your paper for eons.

Perhaps if you choose ONE question, I might (regrettably I suspect) oblige in giving it a go. In return, I'd ask you to provide an answer to my question in post #200, selecting one of the two choices given.

.99

My dear Poynty

It's a comfort to see that you're acknowledging a need to answer my questions.  I'll pass on yours if you don't mind.  At least until you explain the relevance. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose

[poynt99]

I'll pass on yours also then, especially since most if not all the answers to your questions are contained within my analysis already.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I'll pass on yours also then, especially since most if not all the answers to your questions are contained within my analysis already.

Golly Poynty Point.      I KNOW that it's already included in your analysis.  That's PRECISELY the problem.  Your analysis is not so much an analysis as it is a ROMP in the most curious mishmash of misapplied measurement protocols to EVER DISGRACE THESE FORUMS.

Good gracious.

Ever Rosy
Rosie Pose.

by the way.  Here's a convenient link to those arguments of yours.  It gets way too repetitive to keep repeating the original post.
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

GOLLY I put in the wrong link.  Whatever next? 

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

@Rosemary:


Thank you for the links: I will take a look.


SRM.