another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[poynt99]

Rosemary,

Are you saying that you do not see the clear contradiction between your previous statements about how the FG is connected to the Q2 MOSFET, when compared to all the statements you agreed to on that long journey we just finished?

Is it true you are still insisting that the FG- is connected to the Q2 Source?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Dear Professor,

Delighted to hear from you.  And very pleased that you'll consider our claim.  Now.  The point is this.  We've already detailed the scope of the tests in our paper that was forwarded to you.  In it we have outlined the measurements applied to those tests.  For a fair adjudication - I think we need to establish whether those measurement protocols are sufficient?  Or not?  And whether the experiments  would, in fact, prove the claim that is detailed in our second paper.  Effectively we are claiming that we are dissipating significant energy at a load - measured in its temperature rise over the resistor element - and at no measurable delivery of ANY of energy from the battery supply source.

Can we please establish this first?  From there we can move to a discussion as to how to fully disclose this information for your evaluation.  That's always doable.  Somehow.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

edited.  Changed 'deliver' to 'delivery'

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

Are you saying that you do not see the clear contradiction between your previous statements about how the FG is connected to the Q2 MOSFET, when compared to all the statements you agreed to on that long journey we just finished?

Is it true you are still insisting that the FG- is connected to the Q2 Source?

OH DEAR GOD.  Poynty this is getting beyond boring.  Let me ask you something.  DO YOU ASSUME THAT THE SOURCE LEG OF Q2 is CONNECTED TO COMMON SOURCE OF THE CIRCUIT?  ALTERNATIVELY - DID YOU REALISE  THAT THE SOURCE LEG OF Q2 is not connected to the common source?  IT relates to that 'COMMONALITY' that you mentioned earlier?  I'm too bored to find your post on this.  NOW.  That's also an easy question.  And it is considerably less ambiguous than your own.   And unlike your's -it's also PERTINENT.  I ASSURE YOU.  There are ABSOLUTELY NO MISREPRESENTATIONS in that CIRCUIT OF OURS.  I've circulated it to all the collaborators.  And WE STAND FIRM.  That source leg of Q2 FLOATS.  My concern was ONLY that there was some hidden connection that I'd overlooked.

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

Is it true you are still insisting that the FG- is connected to the Q2 Source?

NO.  I HAVE NEVER ARGUED THIS.  HERE'S WHAT WE CLAIM.  The probe of the signal generator is ATTACHED TO (added) the GATE OF Q1 as well as to the SOURCE of Q2.  THAT PROBE CANNOT BE DESCRIBED AS FG-.  IT SIMPLY IS NOT.  STANDARD REFERENCE TO A PROBE IS 'POSITIVE' OR '+'.   

Here's that extract from the schematic that you ordered. I've also now downloaded that full schematic.  NOW.  LOOK CLOSELY POYNTY.  WHERE IS THE SOURCE LEG OF Q2 CONNECTED TO THE COMMON SOURCE OF THE CIRCUIT?  You argued this.  I denied it.  What ARE you trying to tell us?   Or are you just relying on spreading more confusions?  In the hopes that thereby you can IMPLY AND ALLEGE that our circuit representations are WRONG?  What?  Let us know.  Speak your mind.  This is excessively repetitive.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Dear heavens, Guys

This is how Poynty et al manage to steer the conversation away from what's needed.  The technique is this.  Harass the claimant with questions - pertinent or otherwise.  By the way you frame those questions you will be able to imply an INTRINSIC FLAW in their logic.  That way there is NO NEED to explain anything at all.  You simply manage to spread confusion and all the while it seems that you have some insight that you are under no obligation to SHARE. 

It's a TECHNIQUE.  Surely, by NOW - you realise that we're all onto it?  It's really WORKABLE Poynty Point - provided ONLY that the public are not aware of it.  WE ARE.  All of us.  The schematic speaks for itself.  It CONFORMS to our CIRCUIT.  NOW.  AGAIN.  WHERE is the SOURCE LEG OF q2 CONNECTED TO THE common source rail of the circuit?  LET US KNOW.

Rosemary