another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[poynt99]

A negative wattage mean that the power is REMOVED from the source...
Make a sim of a DC source and a resistor you will see for example -10 watts at the source side and  10 watts at the load side:
(-10) + 10 = 0
In this circuit energy still conserved...


Sims have they own method to display result...

Schubert, did you miss this post?

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg312064/#msg312064

.99

[gravityblock]

Bubba you're getting tedious in the extreme.  Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE.  Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.

Rosemary

The scientific community does not yet have some of the SI Units down to their basics.

For example, an Ampere's units are really Meters/Second, but this is not yet understood and so they continue to just use Amperes because they do not realize that "Charge" (Coulomb) is actually a unit of "Distance" (Electron Orbit Diameter).  The now accepted "Charge per Second" (Ampere) is really "Distance per Second" which is the same as Velocity.  The same mis-information applies regarding a Weber and a Tesla.  The units for a Tesla are Kilograms/MeterSecond but they continue to use Kilogram/AmpSec2 or Weber/Meter2.  The community also does not yet realize that a Henry is a unit of Electrical-Mass (Kilogram).  The true electrical units can be easily and clearly viewed on EinsteinElectricity.com

Gravock

[Bubba1]

Bubba you're getting tedious in the extreme.  Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE.  Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.  Much more important is that you answer your earlier concern that a battery can deliver a negative current flow - which seems to be something you really CAN endorse.  Somehow? 

I'm not going to answer any more of your posts Bubba.  They're getting too tedious.  And they've got absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic.

Rosemary

I agree, it's getting very tedious.  But, if you cannot get the units right, then I don't see how you can get anything else right.  This is very basic.

[WilbyInebriated]

It is well known that the SPICE program does not lie or error.

but previously you posted this:

Disregard the small green doughnut near S1, it's an error message from PSPICE. See "burst_osc_schematic01.png" for the schematic.

so it's rather obvious that spice 'errors'... or was that green doughnut 'garbage in'? 

[poynt99]

but previously you posted this:
so it's rather obvious that spice 'errors'... or was that green doughnut 'garbage in'? 

You are correct, it was "garbage in". The S1 switch I placed there was for the purpose of updating the schematic, for the benefit of those wanting to build it. You see, there is no SPICE model for that switch, so PSpice was telling me that it could not "do anything" with that component.

It had absolutely no impact or affect on the results of the simulation results I posted, hence the message to ignore the green doughnut. It was a known garbage INPUT, and it is a "don't care".

But thanks for bringing this to our intention, there may have been others wondering something similar. Hope that explains it well enough.

.99