another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Wow those 3 readers are busy.  Over 1890 reads since last night.
Those busy little buggers.   ;]

Golly.  I'm not that good at math - but by my own rather shakey reckoning I'd say that 1890 is somewhat
more than 4.  And nota bene - one of those master mathematicians is challenging me on my own math.
That's a case of the 'pot calling the kettle black'.  What ever next?  They've got a lot of explaining to do.



Take care Mags. 
Rosie

[Magluvin]

    Im waiting for the....

"And to all of the nearly 2000 readers per day....."

To show up.   

Mags

[AbbaRue]

                        @Rosemary:
Have you ever built and tested other variations of this circuit that also worked? 
If so, could you post a link to were I can find the circuit diagram of it. 

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy reading members and guests,

The schematic of the proposed COP>INFINITY device has again been referenced multiple times that shows incorrectly connected Mosfets !!
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314581/#msg314581    Reply #766 on: March 05, 2012, 05:56:37 AM

And guys,

Here's another schematic that may be of assistance.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

1 circuit schema for Flux It and Schubert - per Poynty.png       (same as)     Simulation Schematic1.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html        Simulation Schematic1.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A modified schematic of Simulation Schematic1.jpg showing the IRFPG50 Mosfet diagram including "internal body diodes" .......

RA_5_Mosfet_Switching_Circuit_Analysis_011_.JPG   (for Mosfet (D) drain (S) source (G) gate example only)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excepted correctly shown as built schematic of the proposed  COP>INFINITY device .......

forMileEverSoHigh_fig1png_thumb.png
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________


These schematics provided by Rosemary below .....

1 circuit schema for Flux It and Schubert - per Poynty.png

Simulation Schematic1.jpg

Shows these incorrect Mosfet connections ....

Q1 (G) gate going to Q2-Q5 (S) source
Q1 (S) source going to + Function Generator

Q2-Q5 (G) gate going to + Function Generator
Q2-Q5 (S) source going to Q1 (G) gate and Rshunt +


FuzzyTomCat

[Rosemary Ainslie]

                        @Rosemary:
Have you ever built and tested other variations of this circuit that also worked? 
If so, could you post a link to were I can find the circuit diagram of it.

Hello AbbaRue.  Actually we've built many variations.  But if you want to know the 'penultimate' it's detailed in this paper on Glen Lettenmaeir's Scribd file. 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

Under normal circumstances I would have been able to post you to a more accurate paper on this on my own Scribd File - but Glen ALLEGED to the Scrbid authorities that this was EXCLUSIVELY HIS OWN WORK.  I was thereby subjected to the curious irony of being accused of 'plagiarism' of my own work.  And when I objected - their legal department resisted any kind of remedial action - and threatening - further - to ban me from using Scribd.  LOL.  Glen never wrote one sentence of that paper.  And through every subsequent banned thread he's been trying to aver that he never even did a replication.  Confusing - when that's what the paper states.  And more confusing still - in that IF Glen is claiming this as his OWN WORK - then he's also denying that its a replication.  It is my opinion that Glen planned to usurp ownership of that circuit and champion it as the 'discoverer'.  Not that I care one way or the other.  BUT.  He then went public denying that there was any benefit at all.  Now perhaps you understand the implications of all those 'hate posts' of his.  He does, indeed, wish me and the technology both - DEAD.

Surprisingly there's another thread there http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/7463-dark-energy-new-scienced-rosemary-ainslie.html which I was not allowed to post on - that had pages and pages of work detailed where Glen Lettenmaier and Harvey Gramm both consistently denied any previously claimed benefits.  They ALLEGED that they'd MISTAKENLY assumed to have achieved any coefficient of performance greater than 1.  Those posts have ALL been deleted and it's now used exclusively as a 'hate' blog against me for Ashtweth Palise's, Cat Lady's and Glen's personal indulgence.  I'm not sure if the owners are aware of this corruption.  But if they are then they must not be surprised at the loss of readership on Energetic Forum.  It seems to be losing it's credibility with the public.  More's the pity because that's the safe harbour of Bedini's work - and it's my opinion that Bedini's contribution to OU has been significant.

In any event, AbbaRue.  It's possibly easier to set up this experiment.  If you google my name you'll see plenty of reference to those that replicated that waveform.  It was also a resonating number.  But less definitive than this new generation sample.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary