another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy members and guests,

You all wonder "WHY" this is a very good question.

If you were Stefan and woke up every day to PM's and e-mail threats of forum closures and multi million dollar "LAWSUITS" from Rosemary ( aka witsend, aetherevarising, dooziedont ...... )

What would you do ..... make sure without a doubt firm ground why to close threads and ban that person ?


Talk about the high road ?? 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg294073/#msg294073    Reply #1790 on: July 06, 2011, 11:01:11 AM
Hi,
as this topic is now too controvers and I was threatened with lawyers,
I will lock now all the Rosemary threads.
Also there was no recent updates of any sorts about the technology and
the only postings I see here are about bitching about the old outdated papers
and scribd files etc..
So it is only annoying.
I have put all the members who got into this flame war into moderation now
and will delete new topics, if they should start again this topic...
Regards, Stefan.

P.S: All further issues about this circuit can be discussed at Ms.
Aisnley´s blog:

http://newlightondarkenergy..blogspot.com/

but not anymore over here.

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy members and guests,

As you may have noticed I do not need hundreds of posting to make my point clear for you.

Most every posting of mine came without debate starting at page 53 but all buried by Rosemary with huge multiple response reply's to others a thesis and other nonsense  ..... no facts.

Below is a recap of my postings of FACTS ...... 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315425/#msg315425          "Asking Why"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315417/#msg315417          "Rosemary's Background"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315412/#msg315412          "12 March 2011 DEMO - Mosfets CIRCUIT Shown Incorrect"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315410/#msg315410          "12 March 2011 DEMO - How many batteries ?? Five (5) or Six (6)"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315246/#msg315246          "Thesis or Device - My Personal Feelings"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315234/#msg315234          "12 March 2011 - Demonstration at CUPT YouTube video"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315141/#msg315141          " Incorrect device schematic at blog and forum postings"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315103/#msg315103           "12 March 2011 DEMO - 15 Engineering Experts There or Not"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315084/#msg315084           "555 Circuit Test - Yes or No"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314975/#msg314975           "HUGE Math Error related to Device / Batteries / Joules"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314793/#msg314793           "12 Volt Soldering Iron VAPORIZES Solder"

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314745/#msg314745           " PRIZE AWARD WINNER !!! "

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314721/#msg314721           "CLAIM and REPRODUCTION for VERIFICATION"

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi members and guests,

As per Rosemary's ( aka witsend, aetherevarising, dooziedont .... ) her admissions ..... for the record in all fairness her disclosure without any
disagreement from me on whats quoted.
Reply #1533 on: June 21, 2011, 07:04:38 AM


Golly.  I'm not sure that the English education system is correctly described as 'alternative'.  I think that anyone qualifying for the
O levels and GCE's and M levels would be inclined to protest.  I was held back for a year as it was considered that I was just too
emotionally immature to cut it so I wrote my M levels 'university entrance to SA universities' when I was 15.  I then went to
university - only because I was too young to get a job. BUT when I was old enough to make my OWN decisions I LEFT
UNIVERSITY.  That was after 2 years when I FINALLY turned 18.  And 1 year before my finals.  And from then until now I worked
for myself - first in catering then in property development and finally in trading.  Since NONE of these endeavors included science
they are also ENTIRELY irrelevant.   And since all of them require some measure of a functioning intelligence I think you can
largely discount Poynt's assessment of me being an outright moron.  But since I still post here then even I'm inclined to doubt
this.

This is also a lot of baloney.  I was VERY CAPABLY TAUGHT by the writings of Gary Zukov, Murray Gell Mann - and a list too long
and too boring to include here.  AND most specifically - I was also taught by Dyson in that IMPECCABLE STUDY OF CONCEPTUAL
PHYSICS.  SO.  I was taught DIRECTLY by the masters or by brilliant writers ABOUT the master - not through the fractured
muddles of those who teach the MASTERS.  And my lack of knowledge as it pertains to ELECTRONICS PERSISTS.  I only USE circuit
components in a VERY LIMITED APPLICATION to prove my thesis.  I STILL do not know how a capacitor works.  AND I wont know
until I've finally taken one apart and worked it out for myself.  I cannot be accused EVER to taking anyone's word for it on any
issue at all - unless I've also UNDERSTOOD the issues.  That's the downside in being me.

I did some page editing here too.  It's a fair summation of my lack of training.  Courtesy Glen

LOL
Regards,
Rosie.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Golly.  Hopefully those posts are now more readable.  In any event, guys, in the interests of keeping this topical - here's what I propose as the
basis of a test to FINALLY get this proven.  If any of you can think of anything that may have been omitted then let me know.

. We run a test switched from a 555 - and powered from the supply batteries to show an identical oscillation
. The same test must also show a negative wattage in the computation of energy delivered by the battery
. The dissipated heat must be sufficient to be greater than any reasonable and applied error margins - as required
. We run that same test from a function generator applied to drive the switch.  We must achieve equivalent results over both tests
  this to prove that there are no grounding issues and that the function generator is not responsible for the extra energy.

. Then we nominate a test that dissipates not more than 50 watts.  From experience I know that the settings default and the test can get out of control.
. Then we either buy 6 x 12 volt new identical batteries or use the 6 batteries to hand.  Either option is acceptable.
. It is possibly preferred to use batteries with a lower rating in order to expedite the test.
. Then we apply our element to a variable power supply source
  this to determine the rate of current flow required to heat the element resistor to 50 watts under standard series conditions from a 36 volt ouput.

. Then we apply an appropriate resistor in series with those 3 batteries to represent the control.
. The three other batteries are applied to our experimental apparatus.
. We must be able to monitor the temperature over the element resistor AND the voltage on the batteries on the control and the experiment - continuously
. We run the test until the voltage over either the experiment or the control or both - reaches 10 volts.  Which will be when both experiments are complete.
. We then recharge all those batteries.
. We swap the control batteries with the test and the test with the control.
. We re-run those tests. 
  this to prove that the results are not due to battery vagaries.

I think that covers the test procedure.  We'll need to work out how to run the supervision.  Let me know if any of you have more refinements required for this.

This should be fun. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[fuzzytomcat]

Hi members and guests,

It appears we have more of the same from Rosemary going on again.

Here is a posting from Stefan with his request for the billionth time and never not one part done.

I'm Tired of this and have a web site to finish and will be recommending the closure of this thread and the "BANNING" of Rosemary Ainslie for the posted reasons made.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg285971#msg285971   Reply #1224 on: May 12, 2011, 07:28:48 PM


hartiberlin
Administrator

Hi Rosemary,

why don´t you do this ?

1) All COP > INFINITY device information in one place in one post not spread out over ninety (90) pages.

2) A accurate circuit diagram of the claimed COP > INFINITY device .... there are five (5) at least that I know of .... and "AGAIN" the one on your blog is incorrect (FALSE) http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html#links

3) All sequenced oscilloscope screen shots and data dumps from the day of the test not days before or after for over a minimum of one hour at 6 minute intervals for a total of eleven (11) verified recordings of the COP > INFINITY device.

4) The complete parts list of all the components used to do a scientific replication to verify the results in a verifiable scientific manner of the COP > INFINITY device

5) All the settings of the Function Generator in Hz or Mhz .... including ....  the setting of the DC offset switch ( -10 VDC to + 10 VDC )

6) A complete photographic image set available for verification and review including the top and bottom of any circuit board of the COP > INFINITY device at the time under or during test .



To get scientific approval you NEED to do these scientific test and exact report documents.

As you have done it with mixed up circuit diagrams and mixed up scope shots
from different mixed ups testings , where one does not know,
which scopeshot belongs to what test, is not scientific.

Before I opened your account and before your demo you promised to release all
data in an open source format and well presented, but what you did present was only all mixed up
and shuffled data so nobody can really see, what it is all about or if there were
measurement errors done and then you suddenly had a wrong circuit diagramm, etc, etc....

So maybe you should quit for a while, do again some more testing and then document
it the way shown above very exactly.....?

Otherwise you will be again ridiculed and laughed at and ignored by the scientific community...

Regards, Stefan.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Enough said for the moment