another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

So now temperature is measured in Watts.

And we see another uninterpretable oscilloscope trace that shows neither a 3.5 percent duty cycle nor an integration of an instantaneous power curve.

Rosemary, you really are incompetent. In just the last two pages, you have erred : in the definition of energy and power; the units of each; the math relating Watts, Joules, and time; how to get power from current and voltage traces; how to interpret a simple algebraic equation; what "C" means in reference to a capacitor; and now you have temperature measured in Watts.

And you have accused me of being an incompetent experimentalist. Please... I have posted YT videos of many of my experimental sessions looking at your various claims. Please... point out EXACTLY where I have exhibited incompetence in my experimentation. Give a link to the particular experiment and the time. If you cannot support your accusation of incompetence with factual references, you really should withdraw your characterization.

LOL.  What lengths you go to TK.  Your efforts are TIRELESS.  But I'll pass - if you don't mind. I'm rather reluctant to look at your videos. They're boring at best.  And we've already dealt with the problem of your poor aptitudes.  Quite apart from which - I prefer to watch videos by those who I respect and admire.  But I think you've already advertised your work in an earlier post.  If you feel the need to repost this?  Then PLEASE.  Feel free.  Do so again.  I'm sure Harti will give you the space.  And I certainly don't begrudge it.  It's not as if it makes a blind bit of difference.

Regards,
Rosie Posie

[TinselKoala]

LOL.  What lengths you go to TK.  Your efforts are TIRELESS.

On the contrary... I am getting seriously tired of your prevarication, mendacity, and willful incompetence -- not to mention your profound disrespect for others, who have spent a lot more time than you have on their academic and other credentials. A high-school dropout with no math, no physics, no chemistry, no electrical engineering.... no patent.... no publications..... nothing but delusions.... trying to discuss electronics issues with the experts.... it would be laughable if it wasn't so boring.

But I'll pass - if you don't mind. I'm rather reluctant to look at your videos. They're boring at best.

I invite anybody reading here to take a look at my "boring" videos. Which is the most boring.... I think it's got to be one of the two where I educate Err-on about the state of the voltage at the Drain of your mosfet when it is turned ON by gate drive. They are pitched at about 6th grade level so Err-on and you might have a chance of understanding.

And we've already dealt with the problem of your poor aptitudes. 

Again.... I double dare you.... point out just where my "aptitudes" are "poor". I'm a good teacher. Again, I invite anyone reading here to look at my demonstrations and critique them.

Quite apart from which - I prefer to watch videos by those who I respect and admire.

You mean those who agree with you. Who is left in that group? Certainly not Aaron or Harvey or others who once believed in your mendacity and errors.

But I think you've already advertised your work in an earlier post.  If you feel the need to repost this?  Then PLEASE.  Feel free.  Do so again.  I'm sure Harti will give you the space.  And I certainly don't begrudge it.  It's not as if it makes a blind bit of difference.

Regards,
Rosie Posie

Stefan sees my videos and occasionally comments there. I'm surprised that you are abusing his good graces in the way that you do.  Once again... I offer my TinselKoil for testing. Use exactly the same tests and protocols and analysis that you use for your circuit. My TKoil is basically your circuit with a different load and some other "minor" improvements, so your test procedures IF THEY ARE VALID for your device will also be valid for mine. You've seen what the TKoil will do.... it outperforms your silly circuit by a factor of at least 10,000. Why are you afraid to apply your measurements and analysis to it? I know why... it is because NOBODY is claiming that the TKoil is OU or has a COP over 1. Yet when measured in your manner, the COP comes out extremely high... even infinite if you like... and it does it while making a 4-inch long power arc that's so energetic that it actually burns the air gases into a plasma.
Meanwhile you can't even show your device boiling water... like I did.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zQdplnCA8

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear Tinsel Koala,

You have most certainly NEVER managed our tests related to our paper.  From your insistence on these rather antiquated references, I'm not sure that you're even on the same page.  But even if you are - who cares?  I don't.  And nor do I care WHAT you think.  Nor is there any legislation required to FORCE me to care.

I get the general impression that you actually don't think that much of me OR my abilities.  Fortunately your opinion doesn't really matter.  Not to me - anyway.  If the readers here are concerned - then?  Just don't bother to read here - is what I'd propose.  It's not as if it's COMPULSORY.  And I keep advising you.  If you feel the need to advertise yourself?  Feel free.  I'm sure Stefan will give you all the space you need.  Meanwhile - if you don't mind - I'll rabbit on about our ACTUAL experiment and our ACTUAL paper.  It is, after all, the topic under discussion. 

Take care TK, and try and reign in all that EGO.  It shows a want of moderation and balance.  Which is required if you want to promote the general impression that you're not neurotically competitive - or wildly obsessed.  Not sure which.  Either way - your work as you keep referencing it - has absolutely NOTHING to do with our paper, our claim, or even the subject of this thread.  It's just OFF TOPIC.  Unfortunately.

Kindest regards,
Rosie Posie 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

   Guys here's that second part of that 2-part paper.  I'll split it into as many posts as are required.  Hopefully it'll engage some of you.

PROPOSED VARIATION TO FARADAY'S LINES OF FORCE TO INCLUDE A MAGNETIC DIPOLE IN IT'S STRUCTURE.

A PAPER prepared by Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron
Abstract[/i]-A heat by product of an oscillation has an exploitable potential as this relates to the efficient use of energy, which is the subject of the first part of this two-part paper. This second part looks at the implications of that oscillation as it confronts certain assumptions related to current flow. An oscillation is induced on a circuit that then enables a reversing current flow that exceeds the circuit restrictions to this flow. This is explained using an extension to Faraday’s model of Lines of Force to include a dual charge in the material property of current flow. These explanations are nonstandard and form a small part of a magnetic field model that predicted and required these results. The analysis concludes that energy can be sourced from the inductive and conductive circuit material.

INTRODUCTION.

  A circuit (Fig 1) is designed to reliably induce an oscillation that is enabled for the duration that a negative signal is applied to the gate of the MOSFET Q1. The level of that oscillation can be varied through adjustments to the duty cycle and to the applied signal at the gate of the transistors. The waveforms (Figs 2 & 3) are typical examples of these oscillations that are induced from voltage measured across a current sensing resistor, (RSHUNT) and the battery supply. The oscillations are robust and they represent a current flow that continually reverses direction. This results in a wide swing of the battery voltage that climbs and falls, well above and below its rated capacity. Also, of interest is that there is no circuit path afforded for this discharging period of each cycle within the standard reference, as its path is blocked, both by the transistors’ body diodes and the negative signal applied at the transistors’ gates. Nor indeed have the transistors been compromised to allow for this half of each oscillation. This raises the questions as to what there is in the property of current flow relating to this oscillation that is able to exceed the circuit components’ physical restrictions to this flow and what accounts for the extreme range of the battery voltage resulting from this oscillation.



These questions can be answered within a classical context as it relates to the both the Laws of Charge and Inductive Laws, here modelled with a modification to the standard reference. The modifications are to concepts related to Faraday’s lines of force (Fig 3) that are extended to incorporate a dual charge in a proposed material property of current. Effectively the proposal is made that while multiple lines of force comprise a magnetic field, each line is structured from magnetic dipoles that are naturally organised at 180 degrees to each other. It is then argued that voltage is an imbalanced, open condition of a magnetic field and that current flow is the transfer of those fields through a circuit and back to its terminal source. By returning to the source it is then able to reduce that charge imbalance by closing those open lines or strings. In this way, the justification or direction of current flow is then led by either a positive or a negative charge depending on the applied voltage and the material source of that voltage. And this charge presentation can then be either repelled by, or attracted to, the ionised condition of various transistor materials or to the charge presented at the transistor’s gates. This would then allow for the flow of current or not, depending on the negative or positive charge presented to the circuit and circuit components that are in the path of that flow of current, and on the polarisation of the voltage that has induced that current flow.
...continued

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The question that remains outside the scope of this study, relates to the location of this source of this energy if it is not, in fact, coming from the battery supply source. This question goes to the heart of a thesis that was developed around a non-classical magnetic field model that predicted these results. The relevant aspect of that model is that it requires this oscillation as a result of the exchange of energy that is supplied by the circuit material. The proposal is that the voltage and the resulting reversing flow of the induced current from the oscillation itself, is led by an opposite charge to the battery primary supply and that the material property of charge is from the circuit material itself. These results are measured in tests that relate to the first part of this two-part paper. What is here intended is to model the current comprising magnetic dipoles and to show that the circuit paths would then allow that current reversal without a discharge of energy from the primary battery supply source

11 THE CIRCUIT APPARATUS

The experimental apparatus comprises a simple switching circuit (Fig. 1). 6 x 12 volt lead acid batteries are in series with both a heating element (RL1) and the Q-array of 5 MOSFET transistors (Q1 & Q2 x 4 in parallel). A signal generator drives the transistors. A current sensing resistor (RSHUNT) on the source rail of the supply determines the rate of current flow both to and from the battery supply source. Circuit components are listed in Table I.

A.  The Circuit Operation
The circuit is designed to allow a secondary current flow that is induced from the collapsing fields of inductive components in the material of the circuit, during the OFF period of the duty cycle and as a result of counter electromotive force (CEMF). A reverse current path is enabled by the paralleled Q-array positioning of MOSFETs (Q1 & Q2) that are configured to enable their body diodes to allow a counter clockwise current flow driven by a negative charge applied to the gate of Q1. This allows a current flow generated by CEMF, that returns to the battery supply source to recharge it. The oscillation occurs at a natural resonating frequency determined by the impedance of the circuit components. The adjustment to the offset also requires careful tuning to regulate the level of power required to be dissipated at the load.
...continued