another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

For your amusement:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMU23e0m3T0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9TNFuvM2k

Note that the circuit is mostly powered by the Function Generator, and it may actually be possible in some cases for the Function Generator to.... charge the battery.

[poynt99]

TK,

You ROCK man!

[eatenbyagrue]

eatenbyagrue,

You're entitled to your opinion, but do you realize how ridiculous that sounds? What is wrong with you? THINK man!

It is all out there indeed. Then where is YOUR working demo?

Point well taken, I will see if I can get the circuit set up and play around with it.

But I think you guys are a little off as to this whole thing.  You are trying to approach this "by the book."  You see, you really cannot do that with overunity.  If you really apply "scientific method" or "rigor" or whatever you call it to overunity research, you are just not going to get anywhere.  There are tons of scientific papers where you guys would be very happy with out there in the world.  With scientists publishing actual verifiable experiments and people questioning every step of those experiments and getting into all the nitty gritties.

I think Rosemary has the right idea.  To succeed with overunity research, you have to take a more holistic approach.  Her circuit is indeed many times overunity.  It may be a subjective overunity, unique to her, but it is her project, and who are you guys to say it is not overunity?  So what if she has a different way of measuring things?  It's like Euclidian versus non Euclidian geometry.  Both ways are perfectly valid, you just have to think outside the box a little bit.  Rosemary's intuition leads her in the right direction, and you guys should respect that more.

[poynt99]

Point well taken, I will see if I can get the circuit set up and play around with it.

But I think you guys are a little off as to this whole thing.  You are trying to approach this "by the book."  You see, you really cannot do that with overunity.  If you really apply "scientific method" or "rigor" or whatever you call it to overunity research, you are just not going to get anywhere.  There are tons of scientific papers where you guys would be very happy with out there in the world.  With scientists publishing actual verifiable experiments and people questioning every step of those experiments and getting into all the nitty gritties.

I agree 100% that questioning the "norm" is good. I did so with the quasi-famous Lewin experiment, and proved that most if not all (including the presenter) have been misinterpreting the presentation and the results.

Her circuit is indeed many times overunity.

You haven't proven this, therefore that is an unsubstantiated statement, and poor science to boot.

It may be a subjective overunity, unique to her

Are you listening to yourself? You've got to be kidding! Subjective Overunity LOL! That's a new one. Very creative. 

So what if she has a different way of measuring things?

So what?

There is a correct method pilots use to calculate how much fuel they require to fly between locations. If they use the wrong method and get the wrong result, then bad things will happen if they calculate low.

Making an accurate power measurement requires that one uses a process and method that will provide the correct result. There is no half-correct result or half correct method.

How do you come up with this nonsense?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I think Rosemary has the right idea.  To succeed with overunity research, you have to take a more holistic approach.  Her circuit is indeed many times overunity.  It may be a subjective overunity, unique to her, but it is her project, and who are you guys to say it is not overunity?  So what if she has a different way of measuring things?  It's like Euclidian versus non Euclidian geometry.  Both ways are perfectly valid, you just have to think outside the box a little bit.  Rosemary's intuition leads her in the right direction, and you guys should respect that more.

Hi eatenbyagrue,

LOL.  If it were purely a subjective analysis then - actually I'd have no claim at all.  But I'm so chuffed to see this much indulgence.  Thanks eatenbyagrue.  Very much.  It's a rare thing on these forums.

And guys - I'm very impressed with TK's video.  He's definitely an expert DEBUNKER.  Its a pity though that we cannot get ANY oscillation without the circuit linked to our batteries.  LOL.  WOW.  If I didn't know better I'd say he's performing feats of magic.  Golly.  Perhaps when more of you try this out - you'll see this for yourselves.  That's always the advantage of a WIDE investigation into a claim. 

One needs to be on ones toes - people.  Or our poor little over unity drive is likely to be discredited.  Whatever next?

Kindest regards eatenbyagrue
Rosie.
I love your name, by the way.  REALLY neat.