another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy reading members and guests,

For the record for those whom are not familiar with my past objections "PLEASE" read the attached posting from July 1, 2011.

Although the subject matter discussed by Rosemary is mostly interaction with others in a BASHING matter ..... the fact is about claims of devices by Rosemary are all on RECORD and other forums over the years, by me or others hence the no arguing from knowledgeable Open Source members who know her mode of operation ( MO ), creating pages of nonsense unrelated to Rosemary's devices. These arguments by Rosemary create pages of nothing from her but rubbish from the continued questioning from us on how she got the results for the data presented, to reproduce the claims of Rosemary's COP>17 or now the COP>INFINITY . The burden of PROOF is Rosemary's not mine or anyone else, we are here for the FACTS and only FACTS, if Rosemary can't answer our questions HERE how in the world can she possibly answer any so called Academic experts in the field of electronics if it's about the device claim of operating with a COP greater than INFINITY.

WE ARE NOT CONCERNED "HERE" WITH A THESIS OR HOW IT MAY RELATE TO ROSEMARY'S "CLAIM" IF EVEN REMOTELY POSSIBLE, IT'S ALL ABOUT A COP "CLAIM" !!

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg293556/#msg293556       Reply #1753 on: July 01, 2011, 07:34:54 PM

Quote from Rosemary Ainslie http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg293530/#msg293530

WRONG AGAIN.  THERE HAVE BEEN MANY REPLICATIONS.  THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IS THE ONE THAT FUZZY TOM CAT MANAGED.  BUT HE CLAIMED that it was ACTUALLY HIS DISCOVERY    NOT A REPLICATION AT ALL.

None of us EVEN CONSIDER THAT ANY VARIATION OF THIS CIRCUIT CONSTITUTES A DISCOVERY.  THEN WHEN HIS PUBLIC LOST ALL THEIR CREDIBILITY HE THEN TRIED SOMETHING NEW.  HE THEN  RAN A WHOLE LOT OF TESTS THAT WERE DESIGNED TO FAIL.  THEN HE WITHDREW THE RESULTS THAT SHOWED THAT IT WORKED.  BUT.  HE HAS STILL LEFT OUR PAPER SHOWING A FULL REPLICATION ON HIS SCRIBD FILE.  SO.  WE NONE OF US KNOW WHAT THE HELL HE IS CLAIMING.  NOR DO I CARE.  THAT CIRCUIT IS NOW SO OLD HAT THAT IT'S ALREADY OBSOLETE.  THIS NEW CIRCUIT IS WAY, WAY MORE EFFECTIVE.

Rosemary your a lying sack of dog do do .....

1) If I actually did a scientific replication of your DEVICE I demand you show proof of your bogus claim of your device including any and all device photos , images and data files of the replication, as you stated in many postings on many forums that you have all this in your possession and refuse to show to anyone in the open source community.

2) I have never claimed your piece of junk as a discovery of mine ..... as I stated in many posts in many forums "SHOW PROOF" of a link in a posting or anything where I claimed this .... you cheep excuse for a liar 

3) So I did testing to throw the results off .... you better have proof of this you ..... I'm sick of your lies and so is everyone else.

4) The scribid file is a optional electronic preprint that was released prior to the submitting of the paper to IEEE and is "NOT THE SAME CONTENT, TEXT OR FORMAT AS THE FIVE TIME REJECTED SUBMITTAL"

May I remind everyone ( ROSEMARY ) again ...... and again .... what is a replication !!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_%28scientific_method%29
Reproducibility is the ability of a experiment or study to be accurately reproduced, or replicated, by someone else working independently. It is one of the main principles of the scientific method.

The results of an experiment performed by a particular researcher or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers who repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description (see independent review). Then they see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group.


http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

RE-PRINT from original

[TinselKoala]

Fuzzy, thanks for linking that video of Rosemary's demonstration. I am very happy to see that the oscillations in my circuit are the same as those shown in that demonstration. It's too bad that the presenters didn't show the response to perturbations the way I did... but perhaps they had their hands full.

Incidentally... or maybe not so much.... here's a document that explains the relationship between voltage and state-of-charge in lead acid batteries.... and "silver calcium" batteries are a type of lead-acid.

http://www.scubaengineer.com/documents/lead_acid_battery_charging_graphs.pdf

Note that, for moderate discharge rates, the voltage doesn't drop below 12 volts until the battery is down to less than 20 percent of its full charge capacity. And that's while tested under load; no-load testing might show 12 volts on an almost completely discharged battery.

[poynt99]

http://www.scubaengineer.com/documents/lead_acid_battery_charging_graphs.pdf

Note that, for moderate discharge rates, the voltage doesn't drop below 12 volts until the battery is down to less than 20 percent of its full charge capacity. And that's while tested under load; no-load testing might show 12 volts on an almost completely discharged battery.

Good point TK. I was wondering what the full charge voltage is on those battery types. At the time of that video demonstration, each battery would be at an average of 12.4V. (62V/5).

[fuzzytomcat]

Fuzzy, thanks for linking that video of Rosemary's demonstration. I am very happy to see that the oscillations in my circuit are the same as those shown in that demonstration. It's too bad that the presenters didn't show the response to perturbations the way I did... but perhaps they had their hands full.

Incidentally... or maybe not so much.... here's a document that explains the relationship between voltage and state-of-charge in lead acid batteries.... and "silver calcium" batteries are a type of lead-acid.

http://www.scubaengineer.com/documents/lead_acid_battery_charging_graphs.pdf

Note that, for moderate discharge rates, the voltage doesn't drop below 12 volts until the battery is down to less than 20 percent of its full charge capacity. And that's while tested under load; no-load testing might show 12 volts on an almost completely discharged battery.

Hi Tk, I though some may find the video of the demonstration interesting for some members and guests, it also may be hard to find with the many screen names Rosemary ( dooziedont ) has.

The "silver calcium" batteries information does make sense with the apparent usage with experimentation and the duration of setting around with Rosemary's work. I remember there was some kind of battery the US government had back in WW11 or there about, used in generals jeeps or important equipment with platinum in them not silver, when discharged and letting them set for some time they would recharge themselves so I've heard.

[TinselKoala]

And as if any further nails would seal the coffin any tighter....

Putting a small capacitor in series with the "positive" FG connection kills all oscillations by blocking the DC current path through the FG.


ETA: I notice that lately Rosie is denying that her oscillations occur when the battery is disconnected. But earlier, when asked about this point, she said something different.


Quoting Rosemary:

"Its a pity though that we cannot get ANY oscillation without the circuit linked to our batteries."

"That oscillation MOST CERTAINLY occurs while the battery is disconnected."

"We have a circuit that generates a ROBUST self-sustaining oscillation that persists for the duration that a battery is entirely disconnected from the circuit."

Am I allowed to ask which statement is true.... or would that be expressing rampant pseudoskepticism again?