another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

eatenbyagrue - I'll be back here later tonight.  Hopefully you'll still be there.  Then I'll explain this.  If I'm wrong you'll no doubt advise me. But I've taken expert advice.  I had to.  LOL

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[fuzzytomcat]

Rosemary,

If your not a coward ..... and still say your device has a COP>INFINITY ....

I WANT TO BROADCAST IT "LIVE" ON MY WEB SITE FOR THE WORLD TO SEE !!!

UNLESS YOUR A COWARD !!!


http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org


Fuzzy

[TinselKoala]

Rosemary Ainslie is applying for.... nay, DEMANDING.... a monetary prize, two actually, for overunity performance. If these prizes are awarded, it will be the first time in history that such a thing has happened. A most extraordinary event, history-making and with the potential to alter the course of humanity.

This being the case...

Am I _really_ the only person who believes that any inconsistency in the claims made should be carefully examined, corrected if in error, justified if they are not, and retracted if they are wrong?

There is a glaring inconsistency in Rosemary Ainslie's claim. Just try sitting in a room for an hour and a half with a device dissipating 4100 watts continuously and you will know what I mean. The most powerful portable electric room heaters available in the USA are limited to 1500 Watts.

25.6 million Joules in 100 minutes is over 4100 continuous Watts.... since a Watt is a Joule Per Second. This is NOT the same as her statement, made over and over, that a Joule is a Watt PER Second.

Quoting Rosemary again, for eatenbyagrue's benefit, who doubts that she has this conceptual error:

Bubba you're getting tedious in the extreme.  Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE.  Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.  Much more important is that you answer your earlier concern that a battery can deliver a negative current flow - which seems to be something you really CAN endorse.  Somehow?

I'm not going to answer any more of your posts Bubba.  They're getting too tedious.  And they've got absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic.

Rosemary

QED.

[eatenbyagrue]

Quoting Rosemary again, for eatenbyagrue's benefit, who doubts that she has this conceptual error:

QED.

I am sure Rosemary just made an innocent mistake.  She is a well educated scientist, and I do not think any educated person would think that a joule is 1 watt per second.  She just transposed some things.  I have full faith in her.

Rosemary, I think if you raise the temperature of water from 16 to 104 degrees (I assume it was salt water), that is an 88 degree change.  So 88 degrees times 900g times 4.184 joules is 331,373 joules.  So that is the raw number.

To correctly calculate what your circuit put out we have to compensate for energy lost during this process to ambient air.  Rosemary, I think if you just stick a thermometer into the pot of water when it is at 104 degrees, turn off the heat, and then observe how fast the pot cools, this could help us calculate this part and we could add it to the equation.  If, for example, it luckily takes exactly 100 minutes to get back down to 16 degrees, we would just double the 331,373 joules and add it to your total, so your circuit would produce a whopping 662,746 joules, which I think is alot!

But that's not all.  We would also need to add 2160 joules per gram of water that has boiled off.  So you could weigh your pot before and after the experiment, and then we would know this.  So let's say 100g of water boiled off.  This would be another whole 216,000 joules your circuit produced, which is great.


For average power, the above assumptions would give us 878746 joules / 6000 seconds = 146.5 watts of power.

So I think you are on the right track, let's just get these loose ends buttoned up and I think you will have your proof finished.  You are almost there except for those small slips.

[Magluvin]

Ya know, TK, you press Rose to give you the truth and straight answers. You demand them from her..

Well what about all the unanswered questions on the Whipmag that you, Tinsekoala aka Alsetalokin, or commonly Al, presented on youtube. You wont answer those questions. So guess what?

You deserve nothing. You really think who you are dont ya. Above all. kinda like Obama a bit.

Ill bet that there was more  money and time invested by others in trying to build what you started, than what has been spent on Roses project. I bet ya.  But you wouldnt be responsible to stop them. You probably enjoyed it all, watching your seed of destruction grow.

Till you spill the whip, you should get nuthin. How do ya like them apples? Ya ole whippersnapper.

Mags