another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[fuzzytomcat]

Guests, Members, Academics, Engineers and Experimentalist

Here is the magical COP>INFINITY device circuit designed by the NERD RAT team in South Africa ..... in it's most simplest form ...

LOOK ??  WHAT'S THIS ??  International Rectifier IRFPG 50 Hexfet Mosfet Data Sheet FIGURE 12a ?? ( irfpg50.pdf )

ODD, KIND OF LOOKS THE SAME ?? THINK ??

[TinselKoala]

There really are only a limited number of ways you can hook six components together.


Meanwhile...
I realise there are supposed to be a bunch of mosfets where that one is. My supplier says they will be back in stock by Friday or Monday next... we shall see.

I'm pretty sure I'm not going to be able to get up to 4100 Watts (Rosemary's claim: 25.6 million Joules PER 100 minutes), though, even with a big stack of mosfets. Let's see.... 4100 Watts at 60 volts requires a current of a bit over 68 Amps. But I'm only using 36 volts or 3/5 of her voltage,  so perhaps I should only expect to get 2460 Watts at 36 volts, needing a current of ... uh oh.... the same 68 amps. ( Do you detect a little sarcasm and irony here?)

But the IRFPG50's maximum continuous current when cold is only a bit over 6 amps, and when it warms up that drops to under 4 amps.

Now, I've seen plenty of mosfets explode.

But never five or six at once. This is going to be fun.

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

Just a few final comments about my capacitor test and some other issues.

I was not 'recruited' to come to TK's defense.  That's ridiculous, he is a grown man.  Getting reinstated has nothing whatsoever to do with you and is not relevant.  I don't buy your alleged 'paranoid delusions' at all.  They are just a card you play from time to time.  It's been a while since you had to pay to get your computer scrubbed.  The Powers That Be must be slacking off.

Look at your friend Magsy and his fascist tendencies, threatening to preemptively get me booted off if I dared ever show up:

Then you will come to OU under a new FAKE member, like SpikyVoltage, or PoonPoonMagoon, what ever.  And I will recognize you, as done before, and you will get banned again, just as you have before.  Your a known Rebannder.  lol 

There is only one word for that:  SHAME!

You try to hide behind the "LOL's" and you are trying to hide from the capacitor test by linking that with my reinstatement.  There is no connection and there is no deal, period.

The bottom line is this:  The vast majority of experimenters on all of the free energy forums understand that they can use a charged capacitor in place of the battery or the power supply.  They all know either intuitively or from theory or from direct experience that when you use a capacitor to power a circuit, that the voltage on the capacitor will decrease over time.  Most of them know how to calculate the expended energy also.

So, in other words, 99% of the people around here can relate to this test, they get it.  You simply can't hide from this fact.

With metaphysical certitude my capacitor test will show that your circuit actually drains the batteries and the circuit consumes current.  There is no escape Rosemary, Nature is not going to lie just because you are clinging to your junk DSO measurements.

So, I just wanted that to be repeated so that everybody reading this thread understands what the ramifications of the capacitor test are.  It will take ten seconds to determine if your circuit is "COP infinity" or if it actually consumes power and is 100% conventional and is under unity.

There is a parallel here with Rossi refusing an offer of one million dollars if he will submit to objective testing.  He won't even though if he did pass the test he would get tens of millions of dollars worth of free publicity.  It doesn't make any sense.  Rossi looks like a con artist and is following the con artist script to the letter.  So if you refuse the test your esteem with your peers drops down that much more.  You can't hide forever and the truth will be coming out.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

And the only reason to go this far at this point in time is pure principle.  This web site is insignificant in the overall scheme of things, even though some others might think differently.  By the same token the Rosemary Ainslie circuit is insignificant.

But a principle is involved.  What is the truth and what does it mean to us?  Do we just run around willy-nilly like a bunch of guppies in a fishtank or do we try to apply logic and reason to our lives?

To read about our "boffins" and "barriers being breached" gets very tedious and it starts to get offensive.  We have a collective responsibility to "hold it together" and not degenerate into a bunch of retards.

Like I said, if Poynt does follow-through and does a full-blown replication to the satisfaction of all, then the truth will come out and we can all close this chapter from the "Dark Ages" and shed some light on people.  We have to start thinking, really thinking, and not just being sheep.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys

What a to do.       I don't want to count the number of pages that have now rolled over - courtesy our trolls.  I got a total of 31 notifications of posting in my email - just yesterday.  The count roughly 5 'for' - 26 'against'.  Not sure if this is right but I think that works out at plus/minus 16% in favour .... and that number 'falling'.    On the whole I think over unity is still the loser.  And my poor efforts along with it.  As MileHigh points out - it's round about now that I write LOL.  These stats are alarming.  If I was to lay a bet on the possible survival of over unity evidence - then I'd plumb for a certain 'fail'.

Delighted to see that TK is still taking his own circuit variants seriously.  Else where would he find his justifications to argue?  And then poor Glen Lettenmaier is trying to communicate something.  God alone knows what?  Clarity is not his strong point.  And MileHigh - who's got a style of writing that I positively envy - is, unfortunately, now regressing into pure propaganda.  Again, MilesUpInTheAir - this is for you.  LOL

And at the risk of boring you all with more repetition - there's been so, so much of it - here's the thing.  Our early claim of COP>17 was replicated - in full public view.  A paper was written on this and roundly rejected by two publications within the IEEE group without going to review.  That replication was subsequently and very articulately denied on Energetic Forum - by both Glen and Harvey Gramm.  Meanwhile ownership of that paper was zapped by our Glen - who is nothing if not unscrupulous - and under oath he declared to Scribd authorities - that this was exclusively his own work. I was not allowed to post the updated TIE version and was threatened with 'banishment' - God forbid - if I persisted with this claim that I had any part of that paper.  I'm like the mother in the Bible who preferred to let the baby be taken away from her than allow it to be cut in half and thereby killed.  Better something than nothing.   

But confusion ABOUNDS - as it's said.  Glen Lettenmaier claims he NEVER replicated anything at all.  Harvey helped him out by insisting that it can't be a replication.  Glen only managed COP>4.  Rosemary managed COP>17.  Therefore, confusingly, the only conclusion to draw from this is that Glen actually and independently orchestrated his own 'discovery'.  And in and amongst all these quibbles and niceties - the fact that there was ever a breach of unity at all - was conveniently forgotten.  Therefore it's a comfort to read that at least Powercat acknowledges that unity was, in fact breached.  And he tells us that 'everyone' knew this.  All along?  And here again I've just seen how urgently MileHigh has denied this.  And so it goes. 

Round and round the mulberry bush. 
Kindest regards,
Rosemary
edited a possesive pronoun.  Ever my weakness.