another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

OOps... where did this scope shot come from, I wonder.

[fuzzytomcat]

This letter to you Glen Lettenmaier is dated May 13th 2010.  It was solicited on the advices from you that you were a MODERATOR at Energetic forum.  Your expressed concern was that Rosemary Ainslie et al were stealing your technology.  It is the second time you have breached email confidentiality by making this available.  Could you perhaps try and solicit an updated reply?  I suspect that the good Professor will know better than to even answer you.  Our work at this institution continued for more than a year thereafter.

Rosie Posie

Howdy reading members and guests,

This has already been discussed in this thread earlier ..... she must have missed this one also as she conveniently sees, reads and responds to whatever her whim is at the time. 

Just another Rosemary Ann Ainslie distraction from the repeated requested re-testing of her COP>INFINITY device with a 555 timer and no function generator and a battery draw down test .... all to be documented, video taped and 100% verifiable ....

NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS will anyone see this ...... COP>INFINITY From Rosemary ..... hahahahahahahahahahahhahaha  to funny !!!!


http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316012/#msg316012    Reply #1244 on: March 19, 2012, 01:41:48 PM

Guests and Members

Some of the most damning slanderous unfounded accusations from Rosemary against me is about her "SCRIBD" paper and my THEFT and REMOVAL of her "SCRIBD" document.

"OUR" REASONS FOR REMOVAL OF ROSEMARY"S "SCRIBD" DOCUMENT -

1) The document Rosemary filed at SCRIBD was water marked "FOR PEER REVIEW" from the IEEE and with the entire REMOVAL of all AUTHORS names on the document.

2) The visit from Rosemary to Professor DR Mohamed Tariq Kahn  (Head) Centre for Distributed Power & Electronic Systems Faculty of Engineering "Cape Peninsula University of Technology

    (CUPT) with her "SCRIBD" document water marked "FOR PEER REVIEW" without any AUTHORS names on it giving a COPY to DR Mohamed Tariq Kahn , as SOLELY her own work. 


Please find attached 100% verifiable e-mail correspondence -

1) Complete set of "SCRIBD" e-mails transcripts - ( Scribd_07-10_02.pdf / Scribd_07-10_03.pdf )
   
2) Inquiry responce from Professor DR Mohamed Tariq Kahn ( CUPT ) - ( Dr_Kahn_01.pdf )

FTC

[Rosemary Ainslie]

OOps... where did this scope shot come from, I wonder.

You ASK?  You found it after an extensive search because you are rather reluctant to reference our official claim - detailed as it is in our paper.  Our claim is ONLY associated with our paper.  NOT with that video.  Surely you know that?  Or has this fact entirely eluded you TK?  In which case it seems that your language competence is as compromised as Glen Lettenmaier's.  I'll see if I can use simple words in future.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear Glen Lettnemaier

You are the only person I know who links to a link and then posts the content of that link nonetheless.  May I impose on you to try and solicit an updated response from that good Professor.  And then may I also impose on you to publish the letter that you wrote to solicit that response from the good Professor.  That would give a fuller picture.  And then.  When you can manage it - try and understand this.  We KNOW why you need to posts all those links.  It is because you cannot write a coherent sentence.  But there's another way around this problem.  Just don't post.  That way we can all pretend that you know how to write - but choose not to,

Rosie Pose

and by the way.  Why are we STILL not in receipt of an interdict from your teams of attorneys?  Frankly I'm getting rather impatient.  I'm sure they're capable of detailing your complaints related to our theft of your work - even if you're not.

[fuzzytomcat]

My dear Glen Lettnemaier

You are the only person I know who links to a link and then posts the content of that link nonetheless.  May I impose on you to try and solicit an updated response from that good Professor.  And then may I also impose on you to publish the letter that you wrote to solicit that response from the good Professor.  That would give a fuller picture.  And then.  When you can manage it - try and understand this.  We KNOW why you need to posts all those links.  It is because you cannot write a coherent sentence.  But there's another way around this problem.  Just don't post.  That way we can all pretend that you know how to write - but choose not to,

Rosie Pose

You cant even spell my name right  as to asking me to do anything for you .... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA .... do it your self "SUPER TROLL" your in such great terms with CUPT !!!

Anyway you and your attorneys can read all about it here, with all the rest of your BS .... http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org/scamsshams.html   ( when I'm done )

FTC