another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[MileHigh]

For reference.....

[MileHigh]

The clip of Terror!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc

[fuzzytomcat]

Guys let me make this absolutely clear.  Since I have learned so thoroughly how TK's mission is deny EVERYTHING he can, I have NEVER apologised to TK for anything at all.  Nor will I.  And I cannot dismantle the existing state of the apparatus if I wanted to.  I do not have the competence nor the eyesight.  That photograph was taken by me before it was modified to this Q-array circuit.  Why would I lie about that?

Rosemary

Rosemary said .....Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that? ... Why would I lie about that?

RIGHT !!! 

TO FUNNY !!!!

[TinselKoala]

OK, Fuzzy, Rosemary, I looked at the EXIF data for that photo, and yes, as Rosemary says, it was taken all the way back at the end of 2010. So it's not another smoking gun after all.

[picowatt]

TK,

I just looked at FIG 6 as well.  There is definitely something amiss.  I too read about 10 volts at the gate of Q1 off the scope shot.  At Vbatt =72volts, Q1 should be capable of flowing much more current than is indicated by Rshunt with its gate at +10 volts.  I would expect to see a bit more than half a major division at the shunt (as the scope is set to 2V/div for Rshunt)  Around 2.5 minor divisions should be indicated.

Fig 3 and Fig 6 do not seem to correspond to the schematic/setup as drawn on this first paper. 

PW