another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Effect of FG Offset on Circuit Response. Long and lazy, um uh sorry about the light.

Note: this video does not represent anything, it only relates to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXAqEinb8YU

YMMV, but not by very much, unless you are using an old WaveTek Model III or something.

Very intriguing video TK.  Masterful misdirection.  Not only did you not bother to show the trace across the shunts but you were careful to IMPLY that you could only duplicate our numbers when you used the AC mode on your scope.  Fortunately our LeCroy downloads show very clearly that ALL our settings are at DC.  And it also measures the effects of the offset.  You are very good at this TK.  All that 'play play' I'm drunk - and 'all is off the cuff' and nothing is rehearsed - and the lighting and still bad?  What an EFFECT!  I'm intrigued.  How much do you get paid for all this?

Guys - this video is just about on a par with that amazing number where he implied that the joule thief claims are bogus because the scope can't manage to keep to the same measurement.  Please simply refer to our waveform downloads.  The channel settings are CLEARLY MARKED DC

Regards to you all - TK included.  And guys, wise up to these games that TK is playing.  Their consequences are scarey if you're inclined to believe all those insinuations.  No wonder he has to film everything in half light.

Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And before y'all start razzing me about the rat's nest wires, here is where I started with this thing... I found the wire lengths were necessary for the oscillations with the bigger mosfets, so I cut wires approximately as long as Ainslie's in the video demo, and the RATs nest is the result. It works great!!

TK - YOU NEED A BIGGER BOARD.  And you need to show us where everything connects.  That's unless we're actually meant to either understand your argument or even believe it.  And colour code your 'FET wires - at LEAST.  Or something.  Or try and show that they're properly connected.  It's a MESS.  And you also need to show us your results.  Frankly I don't think you DARE show us.  I think we're all a little bored with all your insinuations.  You rely on the profound assumption that everyone watching your videos are IDIOTS. Else why would you insult us all with that kind of video.  I'm reasonably certain that the ONLY people who will recommend your efforts are those same people who post here with a compulsion that is way beyond reasonable.

Rosie Pose

ADDED
YMMV - INDEED.  Which stands for You're Misdirected Magnificently and Vastly.  Very entertaining little exercise.  And I am beginning to really  appreciate the hard work that you need to apply to try and kill off our modest little claims here TK.  I wonder why?

[powercat]

Hi All,
Rosemary Ainsley wanted to do some battery drawdown tests together with user
poynt99so I am opening up again this thread.

Regards, Stefan.

I will not be conducting any tests at all while there is any reminder at all - on this forum - of your excessive indulgence in slander.  What you are hoping is that I will engage in any way at all with any of your demands.  I dare not.  It would be tarnished by association.

Rosie Pose

I have every intention of doing a battery draw down test.  I do not know whether I'll be able to conduct that test through this forum.  That's in Harti's hands.  And it's heavily dependent on certain editorial requirements related to this thread - and, indeed, to another thread here on this forum.

Rosie Posie

Rosemary when will you be doing these tests ?

Hello MileHigh

I assure you that we have a level of support that is both surprising and welcome.  The only joke is the transparent efforts by you and TK to detract from this technology.

"guys" Where are you ? Rosemary needs you to show that you can make her claim work.Come on "guys"She only has TK and she doesn't like him he can show her circuit doesn't work as she claims.
Oh no "guys" have you all realized that her circuit doesn't work like she claims.

Well "guys" Pretty obvious why she is avoiding doing any new tests and not answering questions properly, reminds me so much of dodgy politicians who make promises they can't keep.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary when will you be doing these tests ?

"guys" Where are you ? Rosemary needs you to show that you can make her claim work.Come on "guys"She only has TK and she doesn't like him he can show her circuit doesn't work as she claims.
Oh no "guys" have you all realized that her circuit doesn't work like she claims.

Well "guys" Pretty obvious why she is avoiding doing any new tests and not answering questions properly, reminds me so much of dodgy politicians who make promises they can't keep.

Hello powercat

Always nice to be reminded how anxious you are to get us to prove our battery draw down tests.  Believe me so am I.  But I think we should dedicate this thread to an exercise in 'trollmanship' as applied to those such as yourselves.  My prize would be to see it include some actual raw data from TK's DEBUNK courtesy his Tar Baby.  Sorely lacking.  All we have are a series of claims about how he has done this - through twenty video downloads and a report.  Or it may be 20 pages of report and video downloads.  The report is not available...YET - as TK puts it.  Hopefully it will be - in the fullness of time.  Otherwise I may post my results and TK will come in from the rear and CLAIM that they're incorrect as he can't duplicate them.  That would be a shame.  Let me - at its least - have the benefit of seeing where the bar is set.  Then I'll have a 'target'.  And if that means that TK qualifies for Poynty's over unity prize - in his name or in Humbugger's name - and we don't - then so be it.

And I think it's long overdue that the full force of the troll technique be entirely exposed.  Otherwise it can be used again and again.  And that would not be in the interests of progressing over unity or new energy or anything at all through open source.  I'm rather committed to the fond belief that this is still not only possible - but very desirable.  Open source is certainly our only voice for progressing a science that has been widely branded 'pathological'.  Our media wont touch this with yours.  And even a small voice is better than no voice at all.  Else we'll all, forever, be at the mercy of handful of objectors who have an easy time of it when they decide to dismiss scientific evidence.  Thus far they've managed this very well.  And the losers here include the public in it's widest and global sense of the word.  And that probably includes you too. 

Unless - God forbid - he's actually trying to imply that we have NOT got COP infinity.  Or indeed - any efficiency at all.  Not sure what he's claiming.  Not ... yet. Golly.   

Rosie Pose 

[The Boss]

 
Where is the test?