another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[poynt99]

PW,

Yes, I plan on building my circuit to produce a similar negative Wattage computation for battery power.

My circuit is based on Rosemary's, but wouldn't constitute a replication.

Here is my circuit and thread:

http://www.overunity.com/10564/measuring-input-power-accurately-and-with-no-oscilloscope/

Updated circuit and simulations are in second last post.

.99

[poynt99]

In all the years that you have been making these claims not one person has ever successfully matched your claims.

I hope to. 

[fuzzytomcat]

FTC,

In terms of saving threads in PDF format, you simply use your browser to "print to PDF". Of course you need some PDF program installed, such as PDF Creator to do so. Also, you need to do this for every single page of the thread, so you would end up spending some time on this and merging a number of pdf files afterwards.

The job would be made a little easier if you go to your profile settings, Look and Layout, and set your "posts per page" to 50.


.99

Hi Poynt99

Thanks for the posting on the schematic problem of Rosemary's .... I can't understand why any documents that was sent to a accredited journal or magazine would have so many mistakes in it, especially going for a peer review from engineers and academics with possible publication. It seem as you know there's a excuse for every mistake made and nothing a professional would do, then never to correct the mistakes means to me there's a reason Rosemary does this and it's not being honest or honorable in any way.

I found it easy for the PDF to actually do a "copy drag" and a "paste" to Open Office as a document then exporting to a PDF takes a few minutes for each page loading up in the export mode and save it with a file name, it all works as long as the members up-loaded documents don't get deleted at OU ( PDF, Images or photos ) and you get around 14 to 16 PDF pages per one OU page.

http://www.openoffice.org/  " The Apache Software Foundation"  Open Office the Free and Open Productivity Suite

This method is FREE and works great .... I have 150 GB storage at my web site for the future publications in mind.

Regards,
Fuzzy

[MileHigh]

,99 and PW:

I looked at the schematic in the "ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf" version and I am wondering if that paper is based on the same setup as demonstrated in the video.  The question being is the function generator grounded before the CSR or at the negative terminal of the battery?  Certainly in the demo clip the function generator is grounded directly to the negative terminal of the battery which we know is a mistake.

I whipped up a "double CSR" graphic for consideration.  An interesting test could be done.  You could connect one scope channel to the original CSR (CSR1) and a second scope channel to the "new" CSR  (CSR2).  Then simply invert the CSR2 channel and compare the waveforms.  The new CSR2 is between the battery negative terminal and the common ground point.

CSR2 shows the true current flow through the battery whereas CSR1 does not.

In negatively offset oscillation mode:

CSR2_inverted will be positive for clockwise current (battery discharging)
CSR2_inverted will be negative for counterclockwise current (battery charging)
CSR1 will be positive for oscillator output positive voltage  (current from oscillator to ground) ("looks like" clockwise current)
CSR1 will be negative for oscillator output negative voltage  (current ground to oscillator)  ("looks like" counterclockwise current)

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

I can't seem to get my graphic image to appear in the posting and I can't download it.  I am wondering if it is a problem with the forum software.  The new CSR2 is between the battery negative terminal and the common ground point.

Poynt:  Modifying the message doesn't seem to work either.   Perhaps I went past an image uploading and display quota or something.

Fuzzy:  I just removed all of the spaces and replaced them with underscores and still no luck.

Poynt:  Your pdf attachment doesn't work either!  lol