Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

Started by Rosemary Ainslie, November 08, 2011, 09:15:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

TK:

QuoteAll I want is to know just how the NERD device described in the papers is different from Tar Baby. Or, if you'd rather, how is Tar Baby different from the NERD device?

I finally looked at your recent clips and it looks to me like the Tar Baby is essentially the same as the NERD device.  It may take some delicate tweaking to show a negative VI product like Poynt mentioned but in theory it may be doable.

Tar Baby is functionally equivalent to the NERD device as shown by your waveforms.  Have fun testing but I don't think any Tar Baby spaghetti is going to stick to Rosemary.  The Teflon Tachyon Queen?

MileHigh

TinselKoala

Quote from: poynt99 on April 08, 2012, 10:49:51 PM
One thing comes to mind;

Have you shown a negative VI product on the scope as shown in their scope shots? I might have missed it, let me know.

Is that a trick question? No, not yet... I don't have a DSO here in the deepbunker, as you know, and my access to the borrowed one is limited--or was-- by how much heat I can stand in my un-airconditioned vehicle in the south Texas spring sunshine. But that's all better now I think and I might be able to do some digiscopy tomorrow or later in the week. I think that Tek can do live integration. I also still have the Clarke-Hess in the back of the car, but there may be bandwidth issues there.

But I can imagine what will happen. When I deskew the probes and do all the rest of the setup necessary to get good input data, the effect won't be found, just as when I first built the circuit with a tight layout and short wires and it didn't oscillate much. And then when I sloppify things and DO get a negative going integral like I did with Steorn's Orbo.... I'll be accused of fakery.

Why do you ask? Do you think there's much difference? How could there be, with the same mosfets, the same other stuff, and the same everything else?

I already know that my batteries are depleting from heating my load during the oscillation phase. If you can tell me how to stop that part, I'll make any change you care to suggest.

ETA: Shades of Mylow. Rosemary hasn't "shown" a negative VI product, she's shown a data box with some numbers in it. The numbers reflect garbage input data, therefore they aren't a VI product at all, at least not one that is properly time-synchronized.  When you show a negative VI product in your sims, you know why it's happening, I hope, just as I knew when I showed the live, negative-going energy integral of Orbette's input power on the LeCroy 104 toy oscilloscope.

ETA 2: perhaps there is some weird AC power sloshing around in the wrong direction superposed on top of the main DC pathway through the load, and this is what is showing up as a negative value. But I've been simply looking at the NERD's scope parameters, and when I see a positive mean for one trace, a positive mean for another trace, and a negative mean for the product... I know right away that there is an error in how the scope is computing the product. But now that I'm using the 555 timer I no longer understand the full pathways that MH made clear in his diagrams using the FG.

Besides.... instead of just computing VxI.... don't we really need to be computing  |V| x |I| x cos(Phase( V-I)) to get the power in an AC signal ? In other words, tiny delays in one trace over the other caused by lead length or the circuit itself can cause power calculations to go awry if one doesn't distinguish between real and apparent power.

fuzzytomcat

Howdy members and guests,

This "quote" below is almost visionary and and some people may not always agree with Mile High, but when it needs to be said simply clear his grounded points are sometimes very meaningful.  :)

Quote from: MileHigh on April 08, 2012, 07:31:12 PM
He won't give you a moderated thread, you are skating on thin ice.  You will simply delete all posts that you don't like or ban people that you don't like.

I am going to give you the tough truth that you have heard before.  In watching your postings since Picowatt arrived on the scene you have made a few doozie postings that reveal all about with you respect to electronics Rosemary.  There were a few real baddies in the mix so now Picowatt knows that you are totally clueless with respect to electronics.  You might try and you can string a few sentences together and drop a few buzzwords, but there is a kind of Turing test with respect to electronics.  You may have carried the illusion for half a dozen postings but you came through with flying colours and revealed to Picowatt that you are badder than bad.

Why am I telling you this?  The reason that I am telling you this is because that scenario that you just outlined with our favourite anti-bogey men, the experts, and the academics, does not have a hope in hell of ever getting off the ground.  If you can't last more than five technical postings on a free energy board, how do you think you can possibly survive talking about your proposition and a test regimen with an expert or an academic?  The harsh truth Rosemary is that you will never survive a two-hour interview and ongoing engagement with whomever you are trying to solicit to carry the torch for you and have the project sail off into academia.  It's simply not going to happen.  I don't like to be so harsh, but that is the reality.

Your best bet is to work out a test plan with us on this very unmoderated thread and follow through in the execution of the testing.

We may leave a bitter taste in your mouth we are the only thing that you've got.  You simply will not be able to pull off any of your aspirations for your project in the real world.  There is no chance an academic or an expert will take you seriously.

MileHigh

Almost every knowledgeable electronic experimentalist here at OverUnity at one time has dipped into the HOLLOW walls of a Rosemary Ainslie thread, each always ending in the same fate as the "first" and the "last" member, from friend to foe, well wishes to hate speech, educated to stupid ..... Rosemary's right everyone else is wrong. This is and has been the continued pattern or mode of operation ( MO ) of Rosemary over the years and not one known or her make believe experts or academics quoted by Rosemary has ever shown up or commented on her device(s) or performance in any forum on the internet.

The idea that a person cannot go to a internet search engine like "google" or "bing" and type in a name of something like a person and get information on that person to Rosemary is beyond her ability it seems. Those individuals or organizations receiving documents or Rosemary's so called "papers" to a journal or magazine for possible peer review and publication are through a blind review process, which means all authors names are removed and vetted using anonymous reviewers, a team of experts maybe engineers and academics are used. There are many of these organizations that if any authors find out a name of a anonymous reviewer or a individual that is assigned the review process and contacts them directly the document can be and normally is thrown out .... they contact you first only if needed.  :-X

The idea Rosemary's totally combined work in any part is so hidden and hard to find on the internet is laughable as anyone whom has looked has gotten an "EYE" full .... and it isn't pretty, any academic or engineer would run to the hills for cover and she would never be contacted by them ever.

The patients that some members have is exceptional for the abuse they have been through, Poynt99 with 2090 posts and TinselKoala with 2451 posts not just here in Rosemary's threads but in numerous other topics actually helping others willing to hear them. Then there's Rosemary with her 3,060 posts of self bloviating some unproven "Fu Man Chu Zipperon Break Dancing" standard model "THESIS", tied from the hip to some device(s) with wild claims of the same unproven nature, plus we are to believe and except it as "GOD's" word of truth from Rosemary's own testing and evaluation of the experimental device(s) she personally invented ( she can't even read a schematic or solder a joint together ).  ???

I say Rosemary get a grip on the situation, get ready for the fall of your life, the hole you have been digging so hard and so deep for these years it's must be getting mighty hot way way down there, it's also getting very dark and the next shovel you take may have that famed grim reaper under it, so be careful on where you stab that sharp shovel of yours in .... the odds are not in your favor.  :o

Cheers
FTC
;)

Rosemary Ainslie

Guys - what is surprising about that post of Glen Lettenmaier is not so much the uncharacteristic 'flow' of his prose - but the entire lack of his signature cadences.  'Whom' is spelled correctly although still misapplied.  No 'to's' meaning 'too'.  No obviously ungrammatical sentence structuring.  No tantrums.  No colour.  No reference to vast reams of links that are entirely inappropriate.  No direct reference to my own quotes (sadly).  And no real misapplication of anything at all.  Thank you God.  If his actual signature should really read HG as FTC - then it's also something we'll all gladly overlook.  Just for the sheer pleasure of pretending that we're talking to an adult. To avoid his need to get my response 'explained' I'll use words of 'short syllable'.

Regarding this however...
Quote from: editorialghostwriteranonymous on April 08, 2012, 11:55:42 PMAlmost every knowledgeable electronic experimentalist here at OverUnity at one time has dipped into the HOLLOW walls of a Rosemary Ainslie thread, each always ending in the same fate as the "first" and the "last" member, from friend to foe, well wishes to hate speech, educated to stupid ..... Rosemary's right everyone else is wrong. This is and has been the continued pattern or mode of operation ( MO ) of Rosemary over the years and not one known or her make believe experts or academics quoted by Rosemary has ever shown up or commented on her device(s) or performance in any forum on the internet.
Not actually. Not even close.  And 'HOLLOW walls' of my threads is not the best analogy.  But one gets the drift.  And it's not correct to refer to refer to our members as 'hate speech'.  Probably means 'hate speakers'.  And it's not politic to tell those members that they're 'stupid'.  Nor is it necessary.  It's self-evident.

Quote from: ghostwriter on April 08, 2012, 11:55:42 PMThe patients that some members have is exceptional for the abuse they have been through, Poynt99 with 2090 posts and TinselKoala with 2451 posts not just here in Rosemary's threads but in numerous other topics actually helping others willing to hear them. Then there's Rosemary with her 3,060 posts of self bloviating some unproven "Fu Man Chu Zipperon Break Dancing" standard model "THESIS", tied from the hip to some device(s) with wild claims of the same unproven nature, plus we are to believe and except it as "GOD's" word of truth from Rosemary's own testing and evaluation of the experimental device(s) she personally invented ( she can't even read a schematic or solder a joint together ).
Someone may want to inform this writer that 'self bloviating' doesn't actually mean anything at all.  And 'patients' are those people who are sick.  Unless he's trying to imply that members are  - by definition - ill?  Which may indeed be true.  And I can most certainly apply a solder iron.  I've proved this. Do let him know.  But 'Fu Man Chu Zipperon Break Dancing' is DELIGHTFUL.  Couldn't have hoped for better.

Quote from: ghostwriter on April 08, 2012, 11:55:42 PMI say Rosemary get a grip on the situation, get ready for the fall of your life, the hole you have been digging so hard and so deep for these years it's must be getting mighty hot way way down there, it's also getting very dark and the next shovel you take may have that famed grim reaper under it, so be careful on where you stab that sharp shovel of yours in .... the odds are not in your favor.  :o
LOL.  Now it seems that he's a statistician?  'Odds out of favour'?  And he's mixing his metaphors - rather too freely.  Explain to him that if I'm 'digging a hole' then I'm presumably 'in' that hole - else how would I reach 'ground' - metaphorically speaking.  Which means that I would not have that 'far' to fall.  And the 'grim reaper' is not actually located in 'dark holes'.  He only operates 'above ground' - else how could he reap anything at all?  But there's 'a definite and welcome reach for some intriguing prose.

Anyway - far be it from me to discourage this effort.  I've always been something of a scholar of the written word.  And it would be very counterproductive to that interest to discourage these efforts.  So.  On the whole - perhaps someone can recommend FTC AKA Glen Lettenmaier that this gossipy little post is a great improvement and delightfully 'readable'.  Keep up the good work.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie Posie

Rosemary Ainslie

Well guys - that's it.  A mere 33 posts yesterday - and all answered.  Not bad going for the 'frail and elderly' - all things considered.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary

:)