Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Guys,
This post has got me rolling.  What a pleasure to find something to laugh at.  It's hilarious.
It seems that our little Leon is rather frightened at the prospect of FAME which he thinks is imminent.  Golly.  Could someone please assure him him that there's no chance of this.  Unless of course it's in the context of a DR VEST. 

Regards,
Rosemary

Here, liar, laugh at this... the video that you claim you didn't post:

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And guys - as for this...

Without the ground pin, the operator/user is exposed to undue risk, which is why the third ground pin is required by code.

Most universal off-line switchers (as in the LeCroy) are decoupled for transients across the line (and to reduce RF radiation from the switcher).  Some off-line switchers also include L1/L2 to G decoupling as well, but I have yet to see floating the ground on a piece of equipment adversely affect its operation.

PW

Again - a direct contradiction with the implication that picowatt 'KNOWS whereof he speaks'.  Like he KNOWS that the Source at Q2 is in series with the 'ground' of the battery supply? ? ?

Picowatt - I have EXPLAINED why it is NOT CONSIDERED SAFE PRACTICE to expose our LeCroy to ESKOM's POWER SURGES.  Do with that information what you will.  But unless you concede this then you will ALWAYS BE WRONG.   And while I'm at it...  Tell us again why it is that that the Source Leg of Q2 is connected in series with the source supply's negative rail?  WHERE exactly?

Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

Guys,
This post has got me rolling.  What a pleasure to find something to laugh at.  It's hilarious.
It seems that our little Leon is rather frightened at the prospect of FAME which he thinks is imminent.  Golly.  Could someone please assure him him that there's no chance of this.  Unless of course it's in the context of a DR VEST. 

Regards,
Rosemary

Here, liar, laugh at this:

Bubba you're getting tedious in the extreme.  Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE.  Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.  Much more important is that you answer your earlier concern that a battery can deliver a negative current flow - which seems to be something you really CAN endorse.  Somehow?

I'm not going to answer any more of your posts Bubba.  They're getting too tedious.  And they've got absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic.

Rosemary

Got that, Bubba? The correct definitions and mathematical relationships of the units of Power and Energy have absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic of measuring power and energy of an Ainslie device. Zipons, you know.

[TinselKoala]

Guys,
This post has got me rolling.  What a pleasure to find something to laugh at.  It's hilarious.
It seems that our little Leon is rather frightened at the prospect of FAME which he thinks is imminent.  Golly.  Could someone please assure him him that there's no chance of this.  Unless of course it's in the context of a DR VEST. 

Regards,
Rosemary

Here, liar, laugh at this:

In any event it has now been running for 67 hours.  Therefore it's dissipated 10 x 60 x 60 x 67 = 2 412 000 watts. Sorry I've overstated this.  It's been running since Friday 10.30am therefore only 54 hours.  Therefore 1 944 000 watts dissipated. It's rated capacity is 60 ah's = 60 x 60 x 6 batteries @ 12 volts each = 1 296 000 watts. Technically it's already exceeded its watt hour rating at absolutely NO EVIDENT LOSS OF POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE.

You might as well, because everybody else is.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear MileHigh

Rosemary:

It's not hot air and bombast and in your statement above you are completely wrong again.   You are wrong.  Get it?

MileHigh

No MileHigh.  I do not get it.  Because I am NOT wrong.  And for you to keep stating this does not change the fact.  You would need to argue it.  You seem to confuse 'brainwashing' repetition with the 'real truth'... as ever.  And as ever, you are WRONG.

Rosie Posie