Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 130 Guests are viewing this topic.

poynt99

Quote from: Groundloop on May 14, 2012, 11:19:11 PM
.99

Your analyze is not in agreement with actual measurements. Both TK and me got 0,09 Ampere bias current.
You also have just added the bias current to the main current. This is not correct and measurement shows
that this is not correct. Without the bias current running (removing the Q2) the overall circuit current is 1,92 Amp.
With the Q2 installed then the bias current is 90mA. But the overall current did drop to 1,78 Amp. Did you you Spice
simulator to get those numbers?

GL.
All indicated current and voltages were derived from a SPICE simulation on the NERD circuit with a 24 Volt supply, vs. 72V. I applied no math myself.

It would be impossible to correctly measure any significant DC current into the Gate of a working MOSFET. The current through the bias supply is NOT an indication of Gate current.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Groundloop

Quote from: poynt99 on May 15, 2012, 08:37:08 AM
All indicated current and voltages were derived from a SPICE simulation on the NERD circuit with a 24 Volt supply, vs. 72V. I applied no math myself.

It would be impossible to correctly measure any significant DC current into the Gate of a working MOSFET. The current through the bias supply is NOT an indication of Gate current.

.99

We are talking pass each other. What I did address was that your simulation just did add the main current in the circuit
from the main input voltage source with the bias current in the bias loop. This is not what I see in measurement. When the
bias current is running through the MOSFET at the same time as the main current is running through the MOSFET we get
an reduction of the main current. And this reduction is not (main current - bias current). If you remove the bias current by removing
the other MOSFET the the main current is approx. 1,94 Amp. Insert the other MOSFET and the main current drops to 1,74 Amp.
I can't get the numbers correct even if the bias current was 113mA. 1,74 + 0,113 = 1,853 Amp. Do you see what I mean?

GL.

poynt99

Quote from: Groundloop on May 15, 2012, 09:08:12 AM
If you remove the bias current by removing the other MOSFET the the main current is approx. 1,94 Amp. Insert the other MOSFET and the main current drops to 1,74 Amp.
I can't get the numbers correct even if the bias current was 113mA. 1,74 + 0,113 = 1,853 Amp. Do you see what I mean?

GL.
I think I see what you mean, but to be sure could you label my diagram with your measurements? Also, if you could indicate where you are taking your current measurements (i.e. where is your current meter inserted for each measurement?). Thanks.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

poynt99

It is important to distinguish where the measurements are being taken, because it varies depending where. For eg.

Q1 Source current:
1.67A with Q2 installed, 1.6A with Q2 pulled (a decrease in current)

Load current:
1.52A with Q2 installed, 1.6A with Q2 pulled (an increase in current)
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Groundloop

Quote from: poynt99 on May 15, 2012, 09:54:40 AM
I think I see what you mean, but to be sure could you label my diagram with your measurements? Also, if you could indicate where you are taking your current measurements (i.e. where is your current meter inserted for each measurement?). Thanks.

.99

Here is what I'm measuring.

GL.