Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

I see that Ainslie is starting up a fresh discussion of her claims at Rossi's JNP. Many people are already starting to ask the same questions and make the same points that have been discussed and made here and on OUR over the past several years.

At least the versions of the papers she has linked to from there both have the same schematic diagram in them now, with the Q2 gang of four on the left in both papers, and the function generator is correctly identified. I don't see any statement that these are "revisions" or that errata in previous versions have been corrected in these versions.

I haven't poured over them to see what else has been changed.

But it looks like she's got another small group of interested people who will be jumping on "replications"... and who will inevitably find themselves doing just what the rest of us have already done, and with the same set of results. 

She's trying to deflect questions and discussions off the public forum over there and into her private emails. What a great idea that is! She can control each individual's perception without the annoying and inconvenient interference of.... facts.

[fuzzytomcat]

There was a new member at Energetic forum "brian-s-ahern" that popped up on 06-05-2012 that had some interesting wording they posted .....

http://www.energeticforum.com/196506-post7.html

I have performed measurements on a device similar to The South African device with great success. Somehow this stuff can work, but I do not know how the circuit achieves the performance.

http://www.energeticforum.com/196535-post9.html

I am not sure if I am doing this right.

I was working on Rossi-like stuff for EPRI when I ran into Arthur Manelas in Pelham NH. He has an electrical circuit not unlike Rosemary and I made many measurements of the output/input..

His circuit fits inside a shoebox and he ccauses fast rising pulses from a back EMF off a large transformer core. The core runs at a 'negative hysterisis of -3.0C.
He takes 11 watts out of a 12 volt battery and send 42 watts back into a 24 volt battery.

As a physicist with 30 years of lab experience, I know this sounds like a First Law violation. It woks nonetheless.

My working hypothesis is that his ferrite core has nanograined material in the 10 nanometer range. A new form of super-ferromagnetism was reported in Nature in 2006 by van Wayenberge. It comes in the form of a vortes and as such the asymmetric magnetism may be able to access energy from the fourth dimension, iCt.

When I saw the ROSSI and Rosemary in the same post it makes me wonder ..... " As a physicist with 30 years of lab experience, I know this sounds like a First Law violation. It woks nonetheless. "

He hasn't posted again since my replies but in my opinion their not whom they say they are, and the motives are questionable. 


Fuzzy


ADDED - 

Arthur Manelas in Pelham NH
http://e-catsite.com/manelas-device/
http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/ahern-manelas-device.pdf

[poynt99]

Could someone please post a link to Rosemary's new forum?

[TinselKoala]

A "vortes" that "accesses energy from the fourth dimension".

Yep, that's professional physicist talk, all right. I  love the part about "watts". I invite him to test my TinselKoil using the exact same protocols and interpretations he is using.

Rosemary's New Forum? Do you mean this one?
www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?p=/discussions

Or the JNP of Rossi, where there is more discussion:
www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=645

[TinselKoala]

I've looked at the Manelas material that Fuzzy linked.

Here is my understanding of what is being shown. It seems that the electric car is run for a while -20 to 25 miles- to partially discharge its battery, and then the battery charge meter (a voltmeter) reads some percentage, around 2/3, of a full charge. Then the car sits there with the batteries running the circuit, and charges itself, and after seven days the battery charge meter (a voltmeter) reads some much higher percentage, around 9/10, of full charge. And electrical measurements of "watts in" and "watts out" are made on a different system (watts in from a 12 volt battery and watts out to a 24 volt battery). And a magnetized ferrite block is shown "levitating"... that is, repelling, a magnetized needle restrained in a tube, and this ferrite block or one like it is incorporated in the device somewhere as a "black box" that does the magic.

And Ahern is excited about this and thinks his nanoferrite theory is supported and the device sucks energy from the fourth dimension.

Well, he may be right about that last part..... you could call time wasted on yet another pulse charger "energy sucked from the fourth dimension."