Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

So.
You will have explained to Brian, then, that
1) it was actually more like 700 mL water;
2) the water wasn't actually boiling but it had small bubbles;
3) the 5.9 megaJoule figure was pulled out of thin air, or your hat, or some rabbit hole, but not any kind of measurement or math;
and
4) that test used nowhere near even close to a small portion of the total energy in the battery pack.

In the interests of intellectual honesty and full disclosure of information, you really should get all your reported versions of that single experiment to agree, Ains-lie.

[TinselKoala]

Tar Baby and the Capacitors from Beyond:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Awd8_Xro0

Did this get buried already?

People for years and years have been trying to get Ainslie to run her circuit on capacitors instead of batteries. She has always refused, but in the draft manuscripts there is an allusion to a failed capacitor trial-- presented without data, simply as an anecdote -- that is presented to claim that the circuit cannot run on capacitors. Here I clearly show that it can, for a significant amount of time, even on commonly available and not too many capacitors, making the usual negative mean power product, heating a load (slightly, as is normal for the oscillation only mode).

Electrolytic capacitors, too. Ion chemistry and everything.


Everything..... except zipons, apparently.

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

Quoting you:

Please be aware.  These characters have gone to some considerable lengths to apply this slander against us as their objective is to sustain as long as possible - the best interests of our energy monopolists.  This has been an ongoing event ever since our work was put on the internet.  It is only a measure of their anxiety to diminish public interest in these extraordinary results - that are a death knell to their own vested energy interests.

Please therefore treat their interventions with a certain amount of scepticism.  If you're not certain as to the validity of their claims - then check on it by all means. But I would caution you to consider that their zeal is hardly appropriate to the eccentric claims of an experiment that can be easily validated through replication.  It is the fact that these claims entirely compromise their interests that they are so vigilant.  Thankfully their work and its attendant slander is that excessive that it automatically erodes any credibility that it may otherwise have garnered.

That's just complete nonsense.  You are the problem Rosemary.  You are deluded and ignorant and that's a 'dangerous' combination.

You are an insult to the disciplines of science and engineering.  You are misleading people into believing that switching power on and off to an inductive-resistive load will give you over unity.  You represent the dumbed-down fool 'teaching' impressionable people and turning them into dumbed-down fools.

You sometimes read comments on YouTube clips and you wonder what's happened to people, how could they be so gullible and stupid?  It's shocking sometimes.

So you are just getting a dose of reality.  It's a matter of principle.  You are the mindless guppy swimming up against the glass and trying to lure other people into becoming mindless guppies also.  You are simply an insult to all that is good in the knowledge-based world that we live in.  You make a mockery of critical thinking with your ridiculous displays and your very poor grasp of science and energy and electronics.

You are not a 'leader' bringing new knowledge into the world on some noble quest.  You might think that and you clearly are completely unaware of what you really are.  You are just another person that has no clue what she is doing and you think that you have discovered something.  Then to make matters worse, you are trying to spread the word.  Your proposition is foolish ignorant nonsensical idiocy.

So it's worth it to resist people like you sometimes because you are 'mental pollution' and I would hate to see a world where the majority of people think like you.  You have no clue what you are talking about and you haven't breached anything.  It's all a complete farce and people need to hear the truth.

It's a noble effort to point out your ridiculous nonsense.  That's a way to make the world a slightly better place.  That's a way to encourage people to think.  It has absolutely nothing to do with Big Oil.

You are the 'bad guy' Rosie and you don't even realize it.  GO TO SCHOOL - that would be a good start.  Come back in five years and admit what a complete idiot you were when you pushed your foolish nonsense on the masses.

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I won't copy your post MileHigh.  It's a comical assemblage of the most absurdly stereotyped propaganda that I've ever had the misfortune to read.

But I think I need to reference my entire quote as you've edited this as well.  How typical.

Rosie Pose

Just a word of caution to all our members.  Thus far you have all signed up as members in your own names.  This is a laudable convention and much lacking in most forums.  But it is not required.  And to those of you who do use your names please be warned.  It is very likely that a vigilante set of internet personalities will likely contact you in order to alert you to some rather distressing blogs that have been initiated by them to diminish our claims and our technology and even my own good name. 

Please be aware.  These characters have gone to some considerable lengths to apply this slander against us as their objective is to sustain as long as possible - the best interests of our energy monopolists.  This has been an ongoing event ever since our work was put on the internet.  It is only a measure of their anxiety to diminish public interest in these extraordinary results - that are a death knell to their own vested energy interests.

Please therefore treat their interventions with a certain amount of scepticism.  If you're not certain as to the validity of their claims - then check on it by all means. But I would caution you to consider that their zeal is hardly appropriate to the eccentric claims of an experiment that can be easily validated through replication.  It is the fact that these claims entirely compromise their interests that they are so vigilant.  Thankfully their work and its attendant slander is that excessive that it automatically erodes any credibility that it may otherwise have garnered.

I'm sorry to advise you of this but as their interventions are reasonably certain - then you will also certainly be contacted.

Kindest regards again
Rosemary

[MileHigh]

Kindest my ass, you can be vicious.  Like I said, it's about standing up for what is right.  There is a principle involved.

If a Grade Six science teacher started talking about free energy coming from pulsing coils to his or her class you can bet that I would be upset.

You are just an insignificant uneducated amateur doing a silly meaningless experiment.  That's your 12-year story in a nutshell.