Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

@GL:
Ah, yes. The resistors on the drive side on the board aren't pulldowns like I thought, they are base current limiters. So when mosfets are used instead they will need the gate pulldowns that you mention.
I had noticed that the pinouts would be compatible with mosfets. I'll try it with something like IRFP450 and see what happens.
Thanks !!
--TK

ETA: I'll just put the pulldowns into the transistor pin sockets I make from the blue terminal blocks, along with the transistor pins. This way I can use Darlingtons or Mosfets or whatever, without soldering.

[fuzzytomcat]

@ all

Rosemary has some heavy weight competition on postings .... her new personal forum has become a pharmacy now selling drugs .... 


FTC


ADDED - At least Rosemary is finally getting "NEW" members ......and busy ones also  

[TinselKoala]

That is so sad it's funny.

I wonder how long it will take for them to start blaming spambots on the sophisticated hackers of the TKNetworkAnonymous.

It's still going on as I type this ! In the past few minutes it's gone from 1400 new threads started by spambots to 1410 and climbing, and the only "members" logged on are the spambots !!


(Oh.... .99, thanks for correcting Ahern's math. I wonder if it will sink in that even his Manela test probably didn't come close to using up the batteries.)

[derricka]

That is so sad it's funny.

That comment pretty much sums up all of Rosemary's work including the schematics and her "paper" at http://rosemaryainslie.blogspot.com/. As for all the drugs listed in the spam postings on R.A.'s forum, they would go a long way in explaining how such a paper came into existence.

[fuzzytomcat]

That is so sad it's funny.

I wonder how long it will take for them to start blaming spambots on the sophisticated hackers of the TKNetworkAnonymous.

It's still going on as I type this ! In the past few minutes it's gone from 1400 new threads started by spambots to 1410 and climbing, and the only "members" logged on are the spambots !!

@TK

Hummm ....

Well there isn't any rules or "Terms of Service" (TOS) associated with Rosemary's forum .... but there is a "WELCOME" for all to post, other than a posting here of a pre-ban membership for yourself and me. It would be my opinion that without a TOS that anything posted would be alright with that administration. Just for example "G" the administrator and the moderator "chessnyt" have allowed all those postings there, so it must be alright. 

Pretty "LOOSE" on their posting rules from what it appears. 

FTC