Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

And you've avoided answering these questions.  Why is that?  I've reposted them as a reminder.

Rosie Pose

Now.  Tell us all more about those students that you have.  And show us some of those papers that you've published in well establish reviewed journals - which are devoted to mathematical modeling.      And then explain to us all how it is that notwithstanding the wide applause that these efforts have deserved - the time required to discuss and promote all this - you are yet stuck on a little thread of a little forum in the back and beyond of this vast ethernet - writing under an assumed name?  Then explain how your basement laboratory or garage - which you use as a laboratory - is cluttered with second hand junk - from floor to ceiling - that you barely have room for yourself and your camera - let alone a small light bulb here and there to light up   that mess.  Then let us know who are those multiple advisers of yours that stand in the wings of all these absurd efforts - clapping their hands in delight at the scale of your GER ...?

Post away, I don't have to tell you jack cheese about me or my students or my supervisors. The issue here, remember, lying Ainslie, is that YOU ARE LYING ABOUT YOUR WORK, withholding data, and making false claims. Who and what you think I am is no concern of yours.... my work is repeatable by anyone who cares to do it. YOURS.... well, the data is, but of course the CLAIMS are bogus and anyone who looks will find that  out.... whether or not I have one student, many, or none.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Ainslie, this thread is full of disproofs of your tinkering and claims, and most of them are coming from YOUR OWN DATA AND WORDS.

NOT ACTUALLY.  This thread is FULL of your CLAIMS to have disproved.  Since those CLAIMS are unproved and utterly unsubstantiated - then in FACT you've proved NOTHING.

5.9 megaJoules. You are a joke, and it's your own bad attitude that makes me so angry about you and your lies. As I have said many times, had you simply corrected your ridiculous math and acknowledged your errors and retracted the ridiculous claims made based on them, I would not have gotten involved with your current nonsense. YOU brought my "malice" or rather wrath upon yourself by your overweening arrogance and boundless ignorance.

WHAT A JOKE.  Not only has this been retracted - it's been done so publicly.  BUT - should you acknowledge this then you'd lose 100% of the excuse required to FABRICATE all that absurd MORAL INDIGNATION.  Coming from the base of an ALLEGED academic - it's as laughable an allegation as that ASSUMED accreditation.   You seem to forget that we're not all as stupid as you hope. 

Now, go away, Little Miss Mosfet, this thread doesn't concern you any more, since you have shown yourself to be uncooperative, covering up data, and lying about your schematic and your performance claims. YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE AN APPARATUS any more.

THIS IS RICH. Hot off the press.  When exactly was it you claimed that NOTHING ON YOUR THREAD IS CENSURED?  That you WELCOMED CRITICAL INPUT?  Don't tell me that you were simply striking a ridiculous posture and that you meant NONE OF IT?

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

And while you're at it - also explain how it is that someone of such 'HIGH' academic stature as you're ALLEGING - simply forgets to factor in impedance when using a high frequency.  Then explain how you expect a recharge cycle to benefit a non-rechargeable battery.  Then explain how a professed professional - and now an ALLEGED professorial - professional - confines his most articulate comment to slander and invective.  Then explain how it is that you spend so much TIME on this circuit if it's of no interest.

Lots to explain there TK. 

Rosie Pose

You are lying again. Anyone who downloads my spreadsheet can see for themselves that I "forgot" no such thing. And there is NO RECHARGE CYCLE in your apparatus nor in Tar Baby or Altoid. IF THERE  WAS, it would be evident in the behaviour using CAPACITORS which are the ultimate rechargeable batteries USING ION CHEMISTRY in the electrolyte, you ignoramus.

I spend time on this circuit because you are lying about it, it's that simple. IT's MY HOBBY, Little Miss Mosfet, and I can walk away from it at any moment unscathed. IT'S YOUR LIFE, though, and you are desperately trying to retain it, even though anyone can see it's a load of nonsense.

[Magluvin]

And while you're at it - also explain how it is that someone of such 'HIGH' academic stature as you're ALLEGING - simply forgets to factor in impedance when using a high frequency.  Then explain how you expect a recharge cycle to benefit a non-rechargeable battery.  Then explain how a professed professional - and now an ALLEGED professorial - professional - confines his most articulate comment to slander and invective.  Then explain how it is that you spend so much TIME on this circuit if it's of no interest.

Lots to explain there TK. 

Rosie Pose

Most all batteries are rechargeable. Its just how to do so is not commonly known.
Alkaline can be charged but only if not allowed to get hot as the casing wont hold the pressure of internal expansion. So giving them a rest then charging off and on till full works.
But if no abnormal heat is created in the battery, most all can be charged.
So that reasoning doesnt work here Rose.

Mags

[TinselKoala]

NOT ACTUALLY.  This thread is FULL of your CLAIMS to have disproved.  Since those CLAIMS are unproved and utterly unsubstantiated - then in FACT you've proved NOTHING.
WHAT A JOKE.  Not only has this been retracted - it's been done so publicly.  BUT - should you acknowledge this then you'd loose 100% of the excuse required to FABRICATE all that absurd MORAL INDIGNATION.  Coming from the base of an ALLEGED academic - it's as laughable an allegation as that ASSUMED accreditation.   You seem to forget that we're not all as stupid as you hope. 
THIS IS RICH. Hot off the press.  When exactly was it you claimed that NOTHING ON YOUR THREAD IS CENSURED?  That you WELCOMED CRITICAL INPUT?  Don't tell me that you were simply striking a ridiculous posture and that you meant NONE OF IT?

Rosie Pose

Editing it out without comment is not a retraction, Ainslie, you continuing chronic liar. You need to state what it was and WHY you retracted it, for it to count as a "retraction." And there are still plenty of places where it can be found. Like for example RIGHT NOW IN THE OFFICIAL 'PUBLICATION' on Rossi's JNP. What a concerted liar you are.