Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Now... this will be the last of this. As I said in the post above, you are welcome to post here.... but you will be ignored completely if you overstep the boundaries, and especially if you make claims and assertions without evidence.

Are you threatening to ignore me?  Golly.  I'd rather welcome it TK.  If only.   

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

All of your comments about making measurements have nothing at all to do with whether it is a replication or not.  There are many errors and questions associated with your measurements.  TK has and will do his own measurements and they do not in any way have to agree with your measurements.  That presumes that your measurements are "correct" and his are "incorrect."  Anybody that has been following both threads understands that that is a preposterous statement.

My dear MileHigh

TK has not obliged us with ANY measurements.  How is it then that he claims that his 'replication' has disproved anything at all?  Isn't he jumping the gun somewhat?  I'd have thought?  If he wants to claim this then show us.  We're not all about to sit back and let him insinuate his argument.

Rosie Posie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Please answer the questions asked, or you will be completely ignored.

I have answered this.  At length.  But feel free to ignore me if you want.  Again.  I'd welcome it.  Disabuse yourself of the impression that I'm posting here for your benefit.  On the contrary.

You claim again that you can produce the high-heat mode using positive going drive pulses, as shown in the second part of the demonstration video, using the full 72 volt battery pack (and of course the circuit shown in the first paper.) Recall that for the video demo, you REMOVED one battery from your initial stack of only 5, leaving only 4 with a voltage of 48 volts.... and you have never yet explained why.

We most certainly DO manage the high heat test, as you put it - or the water to boil test as we put it - at CONSIDERABLY less than 5 amps delivered by the battery.  The actual value is indicated in our paper.  And it has been more than adequately explained in our 2nd paper. 

Regards,
Rosie Pose.

[TinselKoala]

That was your one chance and you blew it.
There will be no more responses to you in this thread.

[TinselKoala]

I just sent this email. I'm also posting it here in case there are any other readers who might be interested.

Stefan:

It is clear from her last posts that Ainslie is not going to cooperate, that she continues to make false statements, and that she continues to make claims without adequate evidence. She is trying to clutter up the Tar Baby thread with the same kinds of irrelevancies, ignorance and bad attitude that caused her own thread to be locked.

I am asking you, Stefan, to block her from posting in the Tar Baby thread. I stated the reasonable conditions under which she would be welcome to post and she immediately violated them and will continue to do so.

If she is not blocked from posting she will be completely ignored, and so she will simply be wasting your bandwidth and her own time as well as adding distractions and hindering progress.

This is the first time that I have ever asked for anyone to be blocked or banned in any forum. I am in general against censorship of any kind. And I don't want to censor Ainslie either.... but I will not have her lying and distorting and making claims without evidence in a thread where we are trying to carry on a scientific investigation.  And every second that she spends commenting and making claims is another second that she is NOT preparing to perform her own definitive testing.

Thank you for your consideration.

--TK

(copies to Ainslie, MileHigh, poynt99, fuzzytomcat, Laurie, picowatt, Humbugger, Groundloop, hartiberlin)