Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LOL

There is a good chance that the screen cap will come with a link to a posting in a locked thread.  That would spell your DOOM and....  What then?

Not entirely sure MilesOfPureSpeculation.  Presumably it would spell DOOM? LOL (which stands for laugh out loud - by the way... or BTW)   

[TinselKoala]

What, are you now repeating your lying mendacious posts word-for-word YET AGAIN? That is a bannable offense at some forums, Ainslie, but we are conspiring against banning YOU. YOU can take your medicine here, or you can ban yourself, but you aren't going to get away with posting the same old crap over and over.... because I will make the SAME REPLIES I DID BEFORE, you ignorant lying troll.

Again, Hi Guys

Just a quick word.  There is no way under God's sun that we or anyone can generate any version of the required oscillation without the use of a feedback diode of some sort.  Our very early versions of this switch used nothing more than a relay with a diode across the switch.  Our best results were when we simply accessed the internal body diode of the transistors used.  And neither I nor any of our collaborators have stipulated that ONLY the IRFPG50 is required.

It is this kind of SPIN that utterly disqualifies TK from presuming to comment on any of our work AT ALL.  He is FRAUDULENTLY misrepresenting this and this FRAUD is compounded in his CLAIMED 'compendium' as representative of that work.  We entirely disassociate ourselves from it.  I have also now stopped any further notification of posts in this thread.  Hopefully - in due course I'll stop looking in here let alone comment here.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Now you are getting yourself in real trouble, Ainslie. Accusing me of FRAUD or FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION of anything is not only a BALDFACED LIE but it is also, as you so like to say,  ACTIONABLE.

Perhaps you'd like to look up a legal definition of FRAUD, and also SLANDER AND LIBEL.

For your great information, Ainslie you lying arrogant ignorant hypocrite, the majority of my Ainslie Database contains YOUR OWN WORDS AND DATA. There is no way that simply quoting and reproducing YOUR FORUM POSTS AND DATA constitutes any kind of "fraud"... what it does is to illustrate the FRAUD YOU HAVE ATTEMPTED TO PERPETRATE by your attempts to claim monetary prizes for your unsupported claims.

IN FACT, Ainslie, you are STILL making many fraudulent claims in YOUR ONLY "OFFICIAL PUBLICATION". The one you LIED ABOUT RETRACTING.

HERE IS THE PROOF, yet again, IMAGE TAKEN JUST NOW, of AINSLIE's FRAUDULENT CLAIM with which she has sought to obtain at least THREE monetary prizes.

Now you are getting yourself in real trouble, Ainslie. Accusing me of FRAUD or FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION of anything is not only a BALDFACED LIE but it is also, as you so like to say,  ACTIONABLE.

Perhaps you'd like to look up a legal definition of FRAUD, and also SLANDER AND LIBEL.

For your great information, Ainslie you lying arrogant ignorant hypocrite, the majority of my Ainslie Database contains YOUR OWN WORDS AND DATA. There is no way that simply quoting and reproducing YOUR FORUM POSTS AND DATA constitutes any kind of "fraud"... what it does is to illustrate the FRAUD YOU HAVE ATTEMPTED TO PERPETRATE by your attempts to claim monetary prizes for your unsupported claims.

IN FACT, Ainslie, you are STILL making many fraudulent claims in YOUR ONLY "OFFICIAL PUBLICATION". The one you LIED ABOUT RETRACTING.

HERE IS THE PROOF, yet again, IMAGE TAKEN JUST NOW, of AINSLIE's FRAUDULENT CLAIM with which she has sought to obtain at least THREE monetary prizes.


Now, Ainslie, you choose to accuse me of FRAUD without a single shred of evidence or references of any kind. BE QUITE SURE to show these posts to your imaginary lawyers. Perhaps they can educate you, although since you know everything already, that is unlikely.


HERE IS THE PROOF.

Hopefully, in due course, Ainslie will dry up and blow away, since her lying claims have crumbled into dust already.

Now, Ainslie, you choose to accuse me of FRAUD without a single shred of evidence or references of any kind. BE QUITE SURE to show these posts to your imaginary lawyers. Perhaps they can educate you, although since you know everything already, that is unlikely.


HERE IS THE PROOF.

Hopefully, in due course, Ainslie will dry up and blow away, since her lying claims have crumbled into dust already.


Notice the FRAUDULENT CLAIM of dissipating 5.9 megaJoules in 1.6 hours. Note also the FRADULENT CLAIM that "water was brought to boil" in that experiment. This screenshot is from the Rossi Journal of Nuclear Physics blog where Ainslie claims to have a "publication". It is there TODAY RIGHT NOW and has not been retracted as Ainslie has mendaciously claimed.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Now you are getting yourself in real trouble, Ainslie. Accusing me of FRAUD or FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION of anything is not only a BALDFACED LIE but it is also, as you so like to say,  ACTIONABLE.

LOL.  To paraphrase you - on this matter little TK..... BRING IT ON. 

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

You repeat your mendacious post word for word... fine, two can play that game, Ainslie, thread polluter, bloviator, troll you. I repeat my replies.

  And neither I nor any of our collaborators have stipulated that ONLY the IRFPG50 is required.

It is this kind of SPIN that utterly disqualifies TK from presuming to comment on any of our work AT ALL.

Um.... let's see... I have been profoundly criticised by you and your sock puppets in the past for NOT using the IRFPG50... remember how astonished you were when I reproduced your results using IRF830a, a dollar and a half mosfet? Remember Wilby harping on me for YEARS for using a 2sk1548 instead of a PG50 for a few days in my work on your earlier circuit?
And just who is it that is using a single 2n7000 transistor RIGHT NOW to make your negative mean power product and a negative energy integral FOR ANYONE ON DEMAND USING NO BATTERY AT ALL?
You are accusing me of "spinning" something that you are desperately trying to spin in your favor, when everyone knows that you have insisted that the mosfet used have the same high voltage and internal diode and other features of the IRFPG50. You have never shown the use of any other mosfet, I HAVE. You have never compared the performance of different mosfets in your circuit. I HAVE. So spin on this, you arrogant ignorant spinning liar.

On the contrary, I am more qualified to comment on your work than YOU are. So are Picowatt, .99, MileHigh, FuzzyTomCat, humbugger, and even Stefan Hartmann. You, on the other hand, don't understand your "work" or your circuit at all.

You don't even know how to do the calculations! You don't even know how to clean up your own messes, like all the different versions of your manuscripts that contain conflicting schematics, false claims and outright lies, like "bringing water to boil" when you did no such thing, and your 5.9 megaJoules joke.

And you've tried to suppress your own data. Shame on you, you lying hypocrite.

[TinselKoala]

LOL.  To paraphrase you - on this matter little TK..... BRING IT ON. 

Rosie Pose

You are sick. When you have paid your private investigators and your lawyers to send me an expensive letter with no teeth, THEN I'll reply to them with all of my data, which they will be obligated to read. It's your serve, Ainslie, and you are way behind, because I have all this evidence, including the physical threats you've made, preserved IN YOUR OWN WORDS.