Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

you idiot TK.  Look at any MOSFET anywhere in the whole wide world.  IF their source and gate legs were NOT connected then they would not able to conduct ANYTHING EVER.

So.  When you can explain how it is possible that the source and gate leg of Q2 are NOT connected then I'll fully appreciate your argument or even picowatt's argument.

Rosie Pose

Idiot.
If the source and gate legs of a mosfet are connected together internally, it will conduct EVERYTHING, FOREVER, because it is SHORTED INTERNALLY.
Or, if you connect them EXTERNALLY, the mosfet will NEVER TURN ON, because it needs to have at least +4 VOLTS POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE between GATE AND SOURCE for it to turn on, and if they are connected together.... that ain't gonna happen, you ignorant arrogant idiot.

LOOK AT YOUR CIRCUIT DIAGRAM. Are you actually blind, as well as ignorant?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

A small caveat here...

When the FG applies a negative voltage to the GATE of Q1, it is also applying a negative voltage to the Source of Q2.

Who's arguing?  Provided that you're referring to the SOURCE LEG of Q2

R

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LOL.  Guys,

Idiot.
If the source and gate legs of a mosfet are connected together internally, it will conduct EVERYTHING, FOREVER, because it is SHORTED INTERNALLY.
Or, if you connect them EXTERNALLY, the mosfet will NEVER TURN ON, because it needs to have at least +4 VOLTS POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE between GATE AND SOURCE for it to turn on, and if they are connected together.... that ain't gonna happen, you ignorant arrogant idiot.

LOOK AT YOUR CIRCUIT DIAGRAM. Are you actually blind, as well as ignorant?

Here you see our drama QUEEN coming into full 'throat' and malice in full flood.  LOL.  How CHARMING.

Regards
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

Hi Poynty
The Gate and Source LEGS of a MOSFET are physically tied to the same structure. 
Our Source leg of Q2 FLOATS and is NOT therefore connected to the circuit.  As per the schematic.

I think that's right
Regards
Rosie
added

BUT THIS IS WHAT YOU SAID IN THE POST THAT STARTED THIS DISCUSSION, and that you omitted when you continued it:

...you OMIT reference to the connection between the source and gate of Q2.

Ainslie here is clearly talking about her hallucinated ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN SOURCE AND GATE OF THE Q2 TRANSISTORS.

And it's nonsense to claim that one leg of Q2 is not connected to the circuit.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

BUT THIS IS WHAT YOU SAID IN THE POST THAT STARTED THIS DISCUSSION, and that you omitted when you continued it:

Ainslie here is clearly talking about her hallucinated ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN SOURCE AND GATE OF THE Q2 TRANSISTORS.

And it's nonsense to claim that one leg of Q2 is not connected to the circuit.

Not actually TK. The Source leg of Q2 FLOATS.  It is NOT connected to the circuit.  HOW CAN YOU CLAIM THAT IT IS?  JUST CHECK OUT THE SCHEMATIC.

R