Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

What material in the circuit is used up in the process? All, one specific?

We propose that no atomic material comes into the equation.  We're not transmuting elements - as does Rossi.  What we're proposing is a 'binding' field which may explain the Casimir Effect.  This is extraneous to the atom and binds structures into molecules or into coalesced matter.  This is proposed to be the 'thing' that transfers its energies through space.  But it's 'hidden' in the field - a material that structures our magnetic fields.  It's apparent 'out' of the field structure and manifests as 'heat'.  In effect we're proposing that magnetic fields are structured by magnetic dipoles that exceed light speed and respond to an immutable principle of charge balance.  But I'm not sure I can elaborate on this on this thread.  Read my blog.

Regards
Rosie

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

This is extraneous to the atom and binds structures into molecules or into coalesced matter.

They are called chemical bonds, not zipons.

A chemical bond is an attraction between atoms that allows the formation of chemical substances that contain two or more atoms. The bond is caused by the electromagnetic force attraction between opposite charges, either between electrons and nuclei, or as the result of a dipole attraction. The strength of chemical bonds varies considerably; there are "strong bonds" such as covalent or ionic bonds and "weak bonds" such as dipoleâ€"dipole interactions, the London dispersion force and hydrogen bonding.
Since opposite charges attract via a simple electromagnetic force, the negatively charged electrons that are orbiting the nucleus and the positively charged protons in the nucleus attract each other. Also, an electron positioned between two nuclei will be attracted to both of them. Thus, the most stable configuration of nuclei and electrons is one in which the electrons spend more time between nuclei, than anywhere else in space. These electrons cause the nuclei to be attracted to each other, and this attraction results in the bond. However, this assembly cannot collapse to a size dictated by the volumes of these individual particles. Due to the matter wave nature of electrons and their smaller mass, they occupy a much larger amount of volume compared with the nuclei, and this volume occupied by the electrons keeps the atomic nuclei relatively far apart, as compared with the size of the nuclei themselves.
In general, strong chemical bonding is associated with the sharing or transfer of electrons between the participating atoms. The atoms in molecules, crystals, metals and diatomic gasesâ€" indeed most of the physical environment around usâ€" are held together by chemical bonds, which dictate the structure and the bulk properties of matter.

And there is no "fire" on the surface of the sun.
You have a long long long way to go baby.


MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary:

They are called chemical bonds, not zipons.


And there is no "fire" on the surface of the sun.
You have a long long long way to go baby.


MileHigh
Hello MileHigh,

We most certainly concur that it's a chemical bonding.  But chemical bonding does not explain the Casimir effect.  And there is most certainly a fire on the surface of the sun.  It's a 'nuclear fire'.  If it weren't we wouldn't get the benefit of all those photons.  But yes, I've got a long way to go.  And that's the road needed to educate the likes of you MileHigh.

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

Some recent quotes from Ainslie:

Two days ago she said

TK.  We do not claim over unity.  What we state in our paper - for wider testing which is the purpose of publication - is that we have got the real measured and repeatable evidence - under a wide variety of settings - of an infinite COP.  This is using standard measurement protocols.  We define COP infinity as more energy being returned to the battery than first delivered by the battery. 

If you do not claim overunity you have no business applying for an OVERUNITY PRIZE. And if you are claiming that useful work can be done without depleting a power source, you are in fact claiming overunity.
In other words, you are lying again.

. We are well able to take water to boil with the use of 24, 36, 48, 60 or 72 volts applied from the source
. All with varying levels of efficiency
. And all levels measured to exceed COP Infinity
. None of these applied voltages represent any undue stress on Q1 or Q2 whether we use 4 in parallel at Q2 or not

>

And now she says,

And I NEVER reference COP>INFINITY. 

Actually when you say your levels measured to exceed infinity... that is EXACTLY what you reference, liar.

AND

Actually we do not argue COP Infinity ever.   

Actually... you do, over and over, as in your own words above.

Rosemary, you are a liar. You contradict yourself over and over, you constantly misrepresent and lie about  my work, and this thread IS NO PLACE FOR YOUR RIDICULOUS IGNORANT THEORIES.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello TK,

Nice to see you around.  I wonder if you could perhaps take the trouble to address this post.  Then I'll move on to the other three video references.  Because I KNOW how badly you want to keep your thread topical.

Rosie Pose

Your first video referenced 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NevE0FqoRKA
Tek DPO meets Tar Baby for a Play Date
.  Why did you not use that DPO's DISPLAY facility to show the voltage values across the CSR?
.  It's really easily managed.  Yet you didn't see some need for this?
.  Or is that display there?  In the right hand corner at the top?
.  Where the value moves from negative to positive in line with the variations to the offset?
.  But for some reason you kept this out of focus?
.  ALWAYS
.  And WHY did you not use that DPO's MATH FUNCTION to show the product of the battery and shunt values?
.  When this would have got to the heart of the matter
.  so easily?
.  And that trick with the ground?
.  And all that INSINUATION?
.  Are you forgetting those wonderful grounding features of that Tek DPO 4034?
.  Therefore the circuit is only finally open
.  Or the the battery is only entirely disconnected
.  When you ALSO disconnect that wonderful little machine?
.  Shouldn't you have explained this?
.  Instead of implying that there were 'grounding' issues?
.  I'd have thought?

If I didn't know better I'd be inclined to think that you were relying on these omissions to try and 'imply', 'infer' or 'allege' a 'debunk'?  Surely not?  I'm sure you'd never be guilty of insulting our readers' intelligence with such OBVIOUS tactics.  It is hardly likely that you'd go to such inordinate lengths to try and hoodwink anyone at all - that our claim has no merit.  It's not your style.  I see that now.

Regards TK
Rosie Pose

By the way (BTW) - I was MOST intrigued with that background setting where you accessed that machine.  Is that a warehouse?  Full of equipment?  Did you officially register your loan of it?  For that little video of yours?  I'd give my eye teeth to know who the owner is.   

ADDED

I see I'm wrong.  He was here - and ....  GONE again.  I've just checked through 'who's on line'?  I can't think why he won't answer this post.   
Rosie Pose