Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 119 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 12, 2012, 02:33:55 AM
If the tuning is close to begin with the "supernova transition" is just a small twitch, but if the tuning is less close, then the transition is marked, by a sudden definite change in brightness and a snap to a lower frequency and greater amplitude on the scope traces.

TK,

When the "snap to a lower freq" occurs, does the phase change?

("locking" was a bit improper here, I am wondering if a shift in phase occurs when supernova is acheived)

PW

MileHigh

Rosemary:

Because of your recent despicable gutter trash behaviour on your new blog site I am going to repost a few things for us to contemplate:

>>>>

Rosemary:

You know what would be really disgusting?

A headline that makes the day's news all around the world:  "Woman obsessed with free energy machine triggers unbalanced individual resulting in the execution-style murder of a fellow Internet chat forum user."

People sometimes murder and chop people up and post it on the Internet and then mail the body parts to schools and political parties.  Did you hear?

MileHigh

>>>

Who knows if a crazy or crazies are lurking on these forums that attract all sorts of unusual characters.   Nobody knows. I remember the guy a few years ago that claimed in all seriousness that the moon was shifting in its orbit.  I have read many comments by people with extremely unusual political or social views.  Rosemary has already claimed that some of us are "MIB agents."  Then suppose that she reveals someone's identity and a nutcase snaps because he or she can't stand all of the "suppression" that is going on?  I am being deadly serious.

http://www.dailytech.com/Man+Murdered+Over+Online+Dispute/article13071.htm

An online forum dispute leads to the brutal murder of 21-year old Matthew Pike

Last Friday evening, Matthew Pyke was found stabbed to death in his Nottingham, England flat. Pyke ran an online forum dedicated to Advance Wars, which police believe might have resulted in his murder.

Pyke, an avid enthusiast of the Advance Wars series, operated WarsCentral in conjunction with his 20-year old girlfriend, Joanna Witton. Advance Wars is a simple strategy game with releases on Nintendo's DS and GameBoy Advanced handhelds. WarsCentral offers general tips and information regarding the game and hosts an online forum where fans can network.

It is believed that Pyke was murdered by David Heiss, a fellow Advance Wars player and forum user of WarsCentral. According to police, Heiss, who lives in Germany, became acquaintances online with Pyke through the WarsCentral forum.

It is suspected that David Heiss had an argument with Pyke on WarsCentral, and in his rage Heiss allegedly traveled from Germany to England and murdered Pyke. The nature and full extent of the argument is unknown.

Wednesday night, German officials arrested David Heiss near Frankfurt. He is now being prepared for extradition so that he can be tried for his charges in the United Kingdom.

All forum registrations for WarsCentral have now been frozen, and the forum is now only viewable to registered members. A message on the front page posted by a friend who helps run the site offers a small tribute to Matthew Pyke and offers condolences to his girlfriend , who found Pyke dead. 

MileHigh

MileHigh

QuoteThe 555 part of this circuit doesn't work!

Has anyone actually built and run this 555 circuit?

Rosie Posie responded:

>>>

I have NO idea if that circuit schematic is correct or not.  What I do know is that you only need make a typical 555 constructed from ANY schematic off the internet.  TK CLAIMED that it doesn't work - but his CLAIM was contradicted by a bunch of people who DID build it.  But the 555 switch is simply any STANDARD 555.  We would NOT have included it in our paper except that it was called for by our reviewer.  I've spoken to other academics who assured us that the 555 need NOT be included. 

Did you build it that you found it doesn't work?  I thought your earlier results shown were driven by a 555?  Is that right? If so - why did you not just use that?  In any event Greg - I can't comment.  I have NEVER built a 555 and am entirely satisfied that I never could.  So I can't help you.  Perhaps Poynty can.  Or maybe copone?  I know that he's built many.  I'll message him.

Kindest regards (my ass),
Rosie

MileHigh

Rosemary,

The least qualified of everyone in the bunch is YOU.  You are so unqualified that you still don't understand how the Q2 array switches on and you still cannot put a single coherent sentence together that references the gates and sources of Q1 and Q2 that makes sense.

The fact that you claim in the name of "science" that we have to wait for your testing about the mechanism for Q2 turning on is laughable and traji-comic.  All that you have to do is understand how N-Channel MOSFETs work, period.  It's just an example of your ridiculous pigheadedness.

You are a hapless pigheaded woman with zero qualifications pushing nonsense.

Or, you are a well paid agent put here to discredit all free energy research by your outlandish quixotic explosion of ridiculousness.

MileHigh

>>>

Little Miss Moral Transgression, suck on that, glitch!

TinselKoala

And of course she is a mendacious liar YET AGAIN. This Duty Cycle thing is so basic you would think it would have been put to bed by now. But AINSLIE keeps reviving it by NOT CORRECTING HER SCHEMATIC.... which would of course require retracting that "paper" and the claims entirely.

FURTHERMORE, I never "claimed the 555 didn't work". I have always SAID, and CONFIRMED, and INVITED ANYONE ELSE TO DO LIKEWISE, that the 555 timer circuit given with the Quantum article produced an INVERTED DUTY CYCLE from what was claimed, and that this INVERTED DUTY CYCLE of 96 percent ON at the mosfet DID IN FACT produce the load heating profile that she published. She does not understand to this day that the mosfet DRAIN voltage will be HIGH when the MOSFET is OFF in her circuits. She saw a 96 percent LOW signal at the mosfet drain. So she believed her mosfet was OFF 96 percent of the time, hence the "anomalous" heat. But it was not anomalous at all, and as usual her battery capacity was far greater than she could calculate and her trials used far less energy than she claimed, due to her faulty mathematics and flawed concepts.

AND MANY PEOPLE DID IN FACT CONFIRM THIS INVERTED DUTY CYCLE, even her sycophant Joit. And the schematic is there today, for anyone to build.

EVERYONE WHO USED 555 TIMERS with the COP>17 circuit either used their own designs or radically altered the component values and diode placement of the published design. And finally Ainslie moved everyone away from the 555 because of the controversy.

BUILD THE CIRCUIT EXACTLY AS SHOWN IN THE QUANTUM ARTICLE AND SEE FOR YOURSELVES. I have always called for this, and.... everybody who HAS built it exactly as shown AND USED IT IN THE EXPERIMENT has found exactly what I found.

Sorry to shout... but this is the issue that got me so deeply involved in the first place with this Ainslie fanatic. Chet asked me to take a look and the first day, I discovered the duty cycle issue and it was like pulling teeth while running uphill from there on out. NOBODY WOULD BUILD THE THING, they just wanted to argue about it. Sim results started coming in confirming my assertions, she started whining and whinging about errors and this and that, then one or two people built it and found even that their Sound Card PC Scopes were even inverting the input signal and fooling them..... Grr. She has been making errors and lying about them from the very first day I got involved and she will continue to do so as long as she is able to work a keyboard.