Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Ok Poynty.  Would this test prove your proposal that there's a current flow through the function generator's terminal and probe at Q2?

We disconnect Q1 source leg from the circuit. 

Look at my diagram. This is shown.

We then attach the function generator terminal to the gate of Q2 with its probe placed at the battery supply source or negative rail.

The RED alligator clip of the FG is the "probe", right? This has been shown on my diagram.

Therefore in series we'd have the  FG terminal at the Gate of Q2 >to the  FG probe >to the battery source rail or negative rail >to the  0.25Ohm shunt >to the negative terminal of the battery supply.

Exactly WHAT I HAVE SHOWN ON MY DIAGRAM.

We then apply a positive signal at the gate of Q2.  Bear in mind that under this 'schematic' the source leg of Q2 would be DISCONNECTED. 

This of course leaves the circuit open and nothing will happen.

But then she goes on to say, in the next post, after reviewing .99's diagram WHICH I AM NOT ALLOWED TO SEE...

BUT THAT SOURCE LEG Q2 NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE FUNCTION GENERATOR's  TERMINAL.

So that is WHAT I HAVE SHOWN IN THE DIAGRAM THAT I AM  ASKING ABOUT.

And now she says that it's wrong and blames ME for getting it wrong.

THIS IS INSANE. THIS WOMAN IS ABSOLUTELY CRAZY, she is not engaging in any rational discussion at all, she is just clowning around.

I ASK AGAIN.... PW, .99.... WHAT is she describing, and WHY does my diagram below NOT correspond to what she asked for in the posts 62 and 63?

All right, is THIS what she is trying to describe?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

AGAIN - FOR THE EDIFICATION OF THE PARTICULARLY DIMWITTED...

Little TK - you are beginning to sound FRANTIC.

Here's another answer.  Hopefully that settle your obvious disquiet.

Rosie Pose
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2311.msg2609.html#msg2609

[TinselKoala]

Little TK - you are beginning to sound FRANTIC.

Here's another answer.  Hopefully that settle your obvious disquiet.

Rosie Pose
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2311.msg2609.html#msg2609

Get away from me, you disgusting ignoramus. If you cannot OR WILL NOT even draw a single simple schematic, you do not deserve to be in this discussion AT ALL.

BOTH LEADS OF THE FUNCTION GENERATOR ARE ITS OUTPUT, for one thing. There is no such thing as a function generator "probe" and "terminal" or "plus" and "minus". There is SIGNAL, and SIGNAL GROUND or COMMON. Since that is so confusing to you I have recommended using RED and BLACK for your FG output designations, as even YOU should be able to keep the colors of the alligator clips sorted in your feeble excuse for a mind.

And the issue that you are pretending to test has been settled in everyone's mind EXCEPT YOURS for a long time, and we can all see that you are deliberately trying to warp .99's tests and demonstrations so that they can't actually test what you don't want them to test, because they will reveal FINALLY EVEN TO YOU that you have been wrong all this time about your conception of FGs and how they work.

YOU ARE REPREHENSIBLE in your conduct in these matters, Ainslie. You should be totally ashamed of yourself.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

AND AGAIN

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2311.msg2610.html#msg2610

You STILL HAVE NOT DONE THIS.

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

Look again, you ignoramus. Had you simply DRAWN what you mean, instead of garbling your usual verbal monstrosities, we all could have understood instantly. But no... you have to use your own madeup language and WE are supposed to try to figure out what you mean.

Take your garbage toy away and go play somewhere else, you disgusting idiot.

IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO CONVEY?