Testing the TK Tar Baby

[The Boss]

 

This horrible diseased woman will pay for that last comment. 

BRING IT ON  - YOU COWARD. 

Rosie Pose

My sincerest apologies for not getting back here sooner to reply. 
I humbly accepted that gracious public invitation and indeed
commenced the process to "bring it on", as requested.   

I happen to play by my own set of rules.   

The Boss

[TinselKoala]

Good for you , Boss. I'm glad you are around.


Meanwhile.... whatever happened to the assertion that the continuous oscillation mode, the strictly negative gate drive signal mode, was the preferred mode of operation?

I still want to see someone making HIGH HEAT in the load using only the negative gate drive signal mode, continuous oscillations.

It is my assertion that most or all of the HIGH HEAT effect that Ainslie has seen, has come from the straight, nonmagical, perfectly ordinary DC Current that is flowing through the circuit during the Gate HI, non-oscillating portions of the period.

And I assert that Ainslie knows this, and that the attempted diversion into the strictly oscillating, continuous bias current situation was another of her attempts at misdirection and derailing of her critics.

The oscillations neither recharge the batteries, prevent discharging, nor produce much heat in the load.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie says,

I've yet to see if the voltages and currents are out of phase.  And I've yet to prove that there's energy being 'input' by the signal generator - or not.  All I can say is that thus far, on our tests related to this - we have NOT seen a phase shift between battery voltage and current - and that we have NOT measured any energy at all being input by our signal generator.  On the contrary.  We've only measured energy being put back to that generator.  But these are all tests that will be defined in our protocol thread and shown on video.  That's a promise.   

Current and voltage phase relationships during oscillations are shown in Ainslie data. The CVR (current) is shown as usual in golden yellow and the battery "voltage" is shown in the purple trace.

Examples I have of sufficient resolution to determine the phase relationship are
SCRN0166
SCRN0244
SCRN0255
SCRN0313
SCRN0315
SCRN0316
SCRN0324
SCRN0325
SCRN0329
SCRN0330

These all appear to me to show the same phase relationship between battery voltage and current.

A few of these are attached below. What is the phase relationship shown, between the battery voltage and the current?

[TinselKoala]

Can anyone give me the link to the video Ainslie promised to post YESTERDAY, showing her duplication of the conditions resulting in the questionable scope traces?

[TinselKoala]

Well.

Here it is, well after dinner time on the day _after_ Ainslie promised the video showing the replication of the problematic scope shots and the circuit parameters that produced them. But nobody is talking about this video. There is no further mention of this video or the tests that she said she was performing YESTERDAY, anywhere that I can find.

Have I missed something? Or... perhaps God wasn't so willing after all.


Or..... perhaps she found it more difficult than she thought to do what she claimed she could easily and readily do.

Regardless, it appears to be YET ANOTHER broken promise by Ainslie. She promised, God willing, a video by dinnertime in North America yesterday.