Testing the TK Tar Baby

[picowatt]

"2 nanofarads of inductance"  ??

She needs to hire an EE or technical writer just to post a sensible comment or question...

[TinselKoala]

Refraining from tippling so early in the afternoon would help, too. She might learn to read what she writes, at least, or check her calculator results.

Meanwhile, since she doesn't seem to believe that I used a third of a Farad for Tar Baby.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib1kdP7W_tw

But somebody else is going to have to explain the difference to her, between an AC bypass/filter cap, and a cap bank used as a _power source_.

(Do you think she'll criticise me for my misprint, after she blamed Volter for misunderstanding her own.... much more egregious and continuing..."typo"? I do.)

[TinselKoala]

It should be OBVIOUS that when Ainslie says " one eighth of a Farad" she really means 800,000 microFarads, or 0.8 Farad. I'd have thought?
How could ANYONE be so stupid as to not understand that Ainslie ACTUALLY means 0.8 Farad when she says "one eighth of a Farad"?

And if YOU don't understand what she means, that is YOUR FAULT. I'd have thought.

Now... isn't anybody going to ask her where she is getting her 0.8 Farad, or 800,000 microFarad capacitor? Or what it has to do with .99's suggestion that she use 10 microFarads, or her own "SMUG" ordering of an 800 microFarad cap at 150 Rand?

After all, we are supposed to KNOW what she means, even if she says something entirely different and bases her conclusions and rants on her own hallucinations rather than reality.

And it is amazing that she actually brags about her ignorance. Girls who are math challenged, and can't tell the difference between 0.8 and one-eighth. LOL.

Caterers, making FOOD from recipies?  Ptoooie, who put all that salt in this cake?

[TinselKoala]

The rant in the post image attached below, including the promise of the video test demonstrating that picowatt, me, and a lot of other people including LeCroy engineers are wrong, was posted by Ainslie on 5 August 2012. And today is 16 August.

I guess God hasn't been willing. Or... perhaps.... Ainslie has not been able to do what she claims she will CERTAINLY do. Again.

Tick tock, Ainslie. Every day that you do not fulfil your insulting arrogant promise/threat, when everyone knows you have your apparatus and your oscilloscope and your function generator and your DMM and your batteries-- at least three of them, which are plenty for this test.... every day that goes by with you not fulfilling your promise...  is another day of defeat for you.

Just admit you were wrong, retract your manuscripts, and go back to waiting tables, or cosmetology, or something you might actually be able to do .... like writing bad doggerel insults.

The only reason a lot of us are still hanging around is because we want to see you fall flat on your face with these promised video 'refutations' of the things we've been telling you about your circuit and data. So would you please just get on with it, already? 

Or admit you cannot.

Where is the video of this test, AINSLIE? You wouldn't want to lose any more of your few sycophants just because you are LAZY, in addition to being an arrogant liar, would you?

[picowatt]

I, for one, do not wish to see her "fall flat on her face".

It would, however, lend a great deal more credibility to herself, and her claims, if she would address issues presented to her in a more scientific and ethical manner.

Take the Q1 issue for example...