Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Look. We are supposed to KNOW what she means. Isn't it obvious? When Ainslie says something, you have to interpret it backwards. Like Bizarro World. We've noticed this before.

When Ainslie says "Volts" we are supposed to hear AMPS.
When Ainslie says "DC" we are supposed to know she means AC.
When Ainslie says "one eighth" we are supposed to know she means 0.8. And when she says 0.8 we are supposed to know she means 0.000800.

And it is YOUR FAULT that you don't immediately understand and forgive her silly girl, math challenged, not a clue, ERRORS.... the ones that wouldn't even be made if she understood ANY of what .99 has been trying to teach her, or if she simply checked her work before posting. But Ainslie doesn't have to do that, LOL, she's so arrogant that she doesn't even care in the least how abysmally wrong she is... she just moves on to an even greater wrongness. I can't wait to see what she garbles tomorrow. Polly the Paranoid Parrot will be giving us a few more doozys before she's done.

[TinselKoala]

By the way... filing a false police report is a crime in the USA. How about in South Africa?

Yes, it is definitely time for another letter to her lawyers.

[picowatt]

Sounds like someone "smugly" spoke to a salesperson at an electrical supply house (not electronic supply) looking for a cap.  In the discussion she mentions over 200volts and 8 amps and the salesperson, familiar with only 50/60Hz AC, tells her that she is going to need a large uF value cap to handle 8 amps...

Of course, the reactance of a capacitor for a given uF value at 50/60 Hz is way different than at 1.5 to 2.5MHz.  Also, the need for a low ESL (Equivalent Series Inductance) capacitor is not required at 50/60Hz, where the effects of ESL on a cap's ESR (Equivalent Series Resistance) are negligible.  In the end, she winds up with a large NP (Non-Polarized) electrolytic motor starting cap and the belief that small value caps can't carry significant currrent.

I assume she meant to say plus/minus 8 amps.  Many months ago .99 discussed with her the need to correct the CSR value for inductance, and indeed she even reminded TK of the need to do that.  Yet here of late, she continues to use apparently uncorrected numbers regarding the current observed at the CSR.  My recent posts discussing the CSR inductance and the frequencies involved put the current flow at closer to or less than plus/minus 1.5 amps.  Just as she scoffed at my posts, I guess she has indeed decided that there is "no such animal" as inductive reactance.

Now she wants to rehash the AC current flow thru the MOSFET capacitances with her latest "challenge".  This was discussed at length, even on her own thread, immediately following .99's futile attempts to explain the circuit's DC conditions to her.  Possibly she should reread her own thread... her recent question was already answered therein.  The real "challenge" is for her to quit arguing and actually learn and understand, else all discussions are just a waste of time.

As far as her reading the data sheet for the IRFPG50 and quoting capacitance values, can she understand how the capacitances of all 5 MOSFET's are in parallel in her circuit?  Does she understand how the MOSFET capacitances vary with the applied voltage?  If she could spend a bit of time looking at and understanding the graph in her data sheet that shows how the MOSFET capacitances vary with the applied voltage, she might even begin to understand why her oscillation is assymetrical.

Where are all her expert collaborator's?  Surely one of them can calculate reactance...

Maybe one of them can read a 'scope as well and could also explain to her that there is indeed an issue regarding Q1 not turning on when it should in FIG3, 6, and 7...

 

[picowatt]

Regarding crime in SA:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_South_Africa


And more recently:

http://news.yahoo.com/mine-bloodbath-shocks-post-apartheid-africa-082527381.html

[TinselKoala]

Wow.  I knew it was bad... but....

According to a survey for the period 1998â€"2000 compiled by the UN, South Africa was ranked first for rapes per capita.^[15] The incidence of  has led to the country being referred to as the " capital of the world".^[16] One in three of the 4,000 women questioned by the Community of Information, Empowerment and Transparency said they had been raped in the past year.^[17] More than 25 per cent of South African men questioned in a survey published by the Medical Research Council (MRC) in June 2009 admitted to rapes; of those, nearly half said they had raped more than one person.^[18][19] Three out of four of those who had admitted  rapes indicated that they had attacked for the first time during their teens.^[18] South Africa has amongst the highest incidences of child and baby rapes in the world.

Sounds like a real fine place to raise your kids up in, dunnit. Take twenty South African men at random.... and three of them are likely to be serial rapists.

ETA: weird. The word  "  "   ( r a p e ) is apparently a forbidden word on this forum. Rapist, rapes, raper, raped all OK but not "  ".

Fuck, fick, bugger, all OK... but not    r a p e .